On Friday, 28 August 2020 01:30:58 BST Ashley Dixon wrote:
> I can't really comment on LaTeX, because I've never really used it; from
> the small snippets I've seen, I just assume it's TeX with a hell of a lot
> of useful macros. I've always just stuck to TeX, with a copy of the
> TeXBook
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 06:02:43PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 8/27/20 11:55 AM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > Nevertheless, as xkcd so brilliantly explains, TeX inspires a level of blind
> > trust in the content of a document [2]. As long as you avoid proposing
> > standards in the form of an
On 8/27/20 11:55 AM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Well said; thanks for the correction.
Of course. My intention is to positively contribute to and learn from
the community.
Mathematical notation can be seen as a tightly coupled analogue
to this sort of typesetting: the same book that
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:26:59PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I'm sure there are those that will disagree with me. But I don't think it's
> as important how professional things look as long as they are sound ideas.
> Lest it be an ad hominem attack. Which, as previously indicated is not a
>
On 8/26/20 7:07 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
I meant (a), in the sense that you should probably write it up
in a more presentable fashion than a GitHub README page. You might
want to nicely typeset it in TeX or something to make it seem more
serious. Just a suggestion...
I'm sure there
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:33:58PM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 9:57 PM, Ashley Dixon
> wrote:
>
> > Why the name "HillaryMail", and why does the logo contain a picture of
> > Margaret Thatcher? ;-)
>
> very true (re: thatcher). now i cannot unsee the
>
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 9:57 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> Why the name "HillaryMail", and why does the logo contain a picture of
> Margaret
> Thatcher? ;-)
very true (re: thatcher). now i cannot unsee the
thatcher in the pixel art. i have 2 options:
(1) rename protocol into
On 8/26/20 3:33 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I would suggest using any reference to Hillary Clinton.
Typo: I would suggest *NOT* using any reference to Hillary Clinton.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 8/26/20 2:33 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
as for the name "hillarymail", nothing against her.
I would suggest using any reference to Hillary Clinton. I believe her
name is too politically charged to use it in good faith.
it's just that i heard so much about hillary's mails up to a
hi. i request comments on this new mail protocol
which i plan to implement some day if things turn
out well. here is its zeroth draft:
https://github.com/al-caveman/hillarymail
rgrds,
cm.
On 8/26/20 1:57 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 05:19:16PM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
hi. i request comments on this new mail protocol
which i plan to implement some day if things turn
out well. here is its zeroth draft:
https://github.com/al-caveman/hillarymail
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 05:19:16PM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> hi. i request comments on this new mail protocol
> which i plan to implement some day if things turn
> out well. here is its zeroth draft:
>
> https://github.com/al-caveman/hillarymail
Interesting proposal. A few
12 matches
Mail list logo
