Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-06 Thread Abraham Marín Pérez
Bo Ørsted Andresen escribió: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote: So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring later I could do an

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:45:25 +0200, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote: Now think there's a new version available of LIB, let's say version 2.1, but the latest version of APP is still 1.0. If portage performed a deep update by default LIB would be rebuilt, but no APP, what would cause broken

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-06 Thread Abraham Marín Pérez
Neil Bothwick escribió: On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:45:25 +0200, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote: Now think there's a new version available of LIB, let's say version 2.1, but the latest version of APP is still 1.0. If portage performed a deep update by default LIB would be rebuilt, but no APP, what

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-05 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote: So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring later I could do an emerge -u for the rest of it.

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-05 Thread Mark Shields
On 8/5/07, Tim Allingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:32 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote: So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-05 Thread Tim Allingham
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:32 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote: So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. Went ahead and just did the one

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-08-05 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 05 August 2007 17:13:46 Tim Allingham wrote: Because --update stops calculating deps when none of the specified targets need updating. Only --deep checks the consistency of all dependencies even when none of the targets need updating. You could argue it's a deficiency in portage

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-07-17 Thread Iván Pérez Domínguez
maxim wexler wrote: Hi group, At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage. So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. Can you tell us the list of packages it reported? (downgrade and

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-07-17 Thread maxim wexler
Can you tell us the list of packages it reported? (downgrade and run emerge -u again). No, I didn't scroll and paste the output :( How do I downgrade? emerge -pC gives me an ugly warning. Can't see it man or --help. Maxim

[gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-07-16 Thread maxim wexler
Hi group, At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage. So, emerge portage results in one package being installed, portage, 61kb. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring later I could do an emerge -u for the rest

Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?

2007-07-16 Thread Александър Л . Димитров
Hello Maxim On 15:46 Mon 16 Jul, maxim wexler wrote: At tail of emerge --sync its says now emerge portage. Yes, it does that every time there is a new portage version available. emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus portage, 18Mb. from the emerge manpage: --update (-u)