On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:38:34 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild
select systemd as a dependency ONLY
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 11:32:00 +0300
Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:38:34 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now. A proper solution would
Howdy,
Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly.
So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update
sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be pulled in as a
dependency, which I don't want to do.
If I understand the change log below
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Howdy,
Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly.
So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update
sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be pulled in as a
dependency,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:30:11 +
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now.
Which is a lot better than to have it break by the lack thereof.
A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild
select systemd as a
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:39:39 AM Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:30:11 +
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now.
Which is a lot better than to have it break by the lack thereof.
A proper
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:48:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable.
Actually, though it may be marked as stable, it isn't, by which I mean that I
can't emerge -uaDvN world today - I get udev and systemd blocking each other.
I ran
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly.
So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update
sys-power/upower seems to
It is marked stable. Otherwise it wouldn't cause blockers because it attempts
to force an installation of systemd.
--
Joost
On 3 June 2014 12:06:26 CEST, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:48:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:13 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
It is marked stable. Otherwise it wouldn't cause blockers because it
attempts to force an installation of systemd.
The issue isn't really that upower requires systemd so much as that
portage can't figure out that it makes
On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild
select systemd as a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set.
And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set. --
On 03/06/14 14:48, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable.
And that's exactly what happened.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:19:00 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org
wrote:
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below
correctly. So far,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:30:11 +
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now.
AIUI from https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-992290.html, no one
is maintaining systemd-independent power management anywhere upstream
any more.
On 06/03/2014 02:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Sounds like the original poster had the right answer. Starting a
systemd flamewar is not helpful.
emerge -1 sys-power/upower-pm-utils should fix this.
However, this probably should have been a news item before going into
the stable tree...
Rich
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:26:48 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Quick question though. What's the benefit of using '-1' there? So the
package doesn't get added to the world list? Or are there some extra
benefits?
That is more than sufficient benefit. Having upower-pm-utils in @world
could cause
On 06/03/2014 06:46 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:26:48 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Quick question though. What's the benefit of using '-1' there? So the
package doesn't get added to the world list? Or are there some extra
benefits?
That is more than sufficient benefit.
17 matches
Mail list logo
