Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I assumed the two terms were interchangeable. Is that not so?
SATA: based on the IDE legacy over a serial bus, caps out at about
530mb/sec,
NVME: connects directly to a PCIe 4x bus, no overhead of any kind, caps
out at ~2gb/sec...
(legacy HDD: 50mb/sec ideal sequential
Am Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:14:59PM + schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> > Provided the M.2 is using NVME instead of SATA
>
> I assumed the two terms were interchangeable. Is that not so?
M.2 is the physical connector. SATA and NMVE are logical protocols (well,
there are also SATA-specific connectors
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 11:12:44 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2021 12:10:45 PM CET Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> > > A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> > > anyway.
> >
> >
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:12:02 -0500,
Michael wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Thursday, 18 February 2021 06:54:29 GMT Alan Grimes wrote:
>
> > The other discovery was that my /home drive is a 3.0 tb Toshiba unit
> > from 2014... man time flies!!! =P This means that the thing should
> > probably be replaced
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 06:54:29 GMT Alan Grimes wrote:
> The other discovery was that my /home drive is a 3.0 tb Toshiba unit
> from 2014... man time flies!!! =P This means that the thing should
> probably be replaced due to being old as hell...
I've got disks spinning around for more
On Thursday, February 18, 2021 12:10:45 PM CET Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> > A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> > anyway.
>
> Sorry, but that just isn't true. The difference is dramatic. I speak from
>
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> anyway.
Sorry, but that just isn't true. The difference is dramatic. I speak from
experience.
--
Regards,
Peter.
I overhauled my computer today, found two things...
My waterblock is clogged again, down to a trickle of flow, not bad
enough to be dangerous at idle but I've had to order some fresh O-rings
from Germany and will need to rebuild the damn thing again.
Some of the nickel plating is scraped off
On 18/02/2021 08:20, Hund wrote:
Any thoughts about running a drive this old, and what I should be
looking at as a replacement?
No matter how old or new your disk is, keep your backups current and in working
shape.
If it's old, I would just keep an extra eye on the S.M.A.R.T. status and
>My waterblock is clogged again, down to a trickle of flow, not bad
>enough to be dangerous at idle but I've had to order some fresh O-rings
>from Germany and will need to rebuild the damn thing again.
Unless you're a hardcore overclocker, there's really no reason to bother with
it, especially
10 matches
Mail list logo
