Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-31 Thread Kyle Adams
easier still would be to put ACCEPT_LICENSE=* in your make.conf On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.eduwrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Grant wrote: Hi, add to your /etc/portage/package.license : net-im/skype skype-eula This

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-31 Thread Willie Wong
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 09:09:26AM -0800, Kyle Adams wrote: easier still would be to put ACCEPT_LICENSE=* in your make.conf Easier... arguably. But are you sure you want to accept ALL EULAs that can ever be? What if I were to bundle some software that has a two line EULA: By installing this

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-31 Thread Grant
Hi, add to your /etc/portage/package.license : net-im/skype skype-eula This will unmask skype. regards, Could someone explain the purpose of this new portage feature?  I was hoping adding a license to package.license would negate the need to agree to the license when

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-31 Thread Willie Wong
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14:27AM -0800, Grant wrote: I'm doing all of my testing with net-wireless/broadcom-sta. package.license seems to unmask the package which otherwise won't emerge. ACCEPT_LICENSE does negate the need manually accept the license. So they seem to perform different

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-30 Thread Grant
Hi, add to your /etc/portage/package.license : net-im/skype skype-eula This will unmask skype. regards, Boris Could someone explain the purpose of this new portage feature? I was hoping adding a license to package.license would negate the need to agree to the license when emerging,

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-30 Thread Willie Wong
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Grant wrote: Hi, add to your /etc/portage/package.license : net-im/skype skype-eula This will unmask skype. regards, Could someone explain the purpose of this new portage feature? I was hoping adding a license to package.license

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-26 Thread Boris Fersing
Hi, add to your /etc/portage/package.license : net-im/skype skype-eula This will unmask skype. regards, Boris On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:27, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: This is confusing me ... I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now.  eix -l skype shows: [I]

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-26 Thread John H. Moe
Mick wrote: This is confusing me ... I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now. eix -l skype shows: [I] net-im/skype Available versions: 2.0.0.72!m!s amd64 x86 [qt-static] ~ 2.1.0.81+i!m!s ~amd64 ~x86 [qt-static] Installed

Re: [gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-26 Thread Mick
2010/1/26 John H. Moe john...@optusnet.com.au: Mick wrote: This is confusing me ... I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now.  eix -l skype shows: [I] net-im/skype      Available versions:                         2.0.0.72!m!s amd64 x86 [qt-static]                 ~      

[gentoo-user] skype masked because of eula?

2010-01-25 Thread Mick
This is confusing me ... I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now. eix -l skype shows: [I] net-im/skype Available versions: 2.0.0.72!m!s amd64 x86 [qt-static] ~ 2.1.0.81+i!m!s ~amd64 ~x86 [qt-static] Installed versions: