Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:16:29 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote: > On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote: > >My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to > >compile systemd-226 today. > > Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is > almost 9

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote: > I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's > automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that You can switch it on or off, but it applies to the whole message. What I do if I want a

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote: >My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to >compile systemd-226 today. Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is almost 9 years old now, and systemd compiles in about 6 minutes: # genlop -t

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:57:04 Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote: >> I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's >> automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that > >You can switch it on or off,

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:08 PM, walt wrote: > My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to > compile systemd-226 today. I was curious to know why it was taking so > long to finish, so I used 'top' to see what was happening. > > Turns out that two

[gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to compile systemd-226 today. I was curious to know why it was taking so long to finish, so I used 'top' to see what was happening. Turns out that two instances of 'sh' were each using 15-30% of CPU for a total of 30-60% (the