Am 01.12.2012 00:13, schrieb William Kenworthy:
why? - threads sounds like a good thing, but is it really if its
optional?
Threads - at least for apache - is optional, because you can compile
apache with different MPMs (see documentation). MPM_PREFORK for example
does not use threads, it
ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the threads use
flag.
PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they wont play
nice. So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of stuff one way
or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither, one
enabled ... no
I would suggest using threads
-Kevin B
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.auwrote:
ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the threads use
flag.
PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they wont play
nice. So if I have to go back
why? - threads sounds like a good thing, but is it really if its
optional?
Its looking like threads minus is the way to go for php as geos needs
php built with -threads - I now suspect I am going to be locked into one
way (hopefully there is one way!) once I sort out the build
dependencies.
well i guess it depends if your using php that takes advantage of
concurrency. If you dont then threads arent necessary,
for apache i would recommend threads because it does make use of them.
Kevin B
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.auwrote:
why? - threads
5 matches
Mail list logo
