Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:22:27AM -0400, Rasmus Thomsen wrote > Hi, > > unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the > binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway? Yes, because it's a different part of the build. Personal experience; I do the contributed SSE-only Pale Moon

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote > Many thanks for your hints! > > On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Out of sheer curiousity, what > > does gcc report as your native cpu when you run... > > > > gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march= >

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

Hi, unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway? Regards, Rasmus Original Message On 14 May 2017, 07:13, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote > > I have switched to

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

Many thanks for your hints! On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: Why aren't you running "-march=native"? You're probably missing quite a few features of your cpu. BTW, "-march=native" implies "-mtune=native" and "-msse3" (if the cpu supports it). Out of sheer curiousity, what

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote > > I have switched to gcc-6.3.0 at the end of last year. > I have (re-)compiled all my packages including icewm-1.3.12-r1. > Everything works just fine. > > I did have some segfaults (with gimp) until I recompiled each package >

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On 170513-17:25+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 05/13/2017 04:07:52 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > > On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > > > > > "Walter's Excellent

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On 05/13/2017 04:07:52 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > > > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM > > > built,

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > > > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM > > > built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM > built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory, the > .xinitrc, and local X startup script

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM > built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory, the > .xinitrc, and local X startup script from my current machine, where it > all works. I run

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

"Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory, the .xinitrc, and local X startup script from my current machine, where it all works. I run "startx", and the X window pops up and I can see the cursor... for

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:15:23PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote > > Bringing a 2008 Core2 duo back into use. I ran into major problems > with graphite optimizations. So I re-installed without graphite. > > I copied over most of

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote Bringing a 2008 Core2 duo back into use. I ran into major problems with graphite optimizations. So I re-installed without graphite. I copied over most of the world file from my current desktop (GCC 5.4.0) and tried it on the

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

I've been running some number theory on my CPU 24/7 for the last month... It's a good burn-in because it uses all my cpu and all my ram. =P The run will complete a month from now, I hope... Kinda stoked about gcc 6.x coming, really looking forward to rebuilding my system, hope things go well by

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:59:12AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > I blew away the partially completed install and started again. > This time, it'll be 6.3.0 without graphite. > > I'm busy Tuesday morning. So I'll fire up an "emerge -e @world" > before going to bed, and see where things are when I

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

I have a 2008 dual core Core2 that I gave up on because it doesn't support QEMU hardware acceleration. Now that I've figured out chroot for stuff I need, I decided to do a new 32-bit install. I figured this might be a chance to experiment with GCC 6.3.0. I went whole-hog and enabled graphite,

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On May 8, 2017 1:47:22 PM GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >Raffaele Belardi wrote: >> During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with >> gcc-6.3.0: >> >> 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except: >> - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

Raffaele Belardi wrote: > During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with > gcc-6.3.0: > > 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except: > - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it > (possibly an issue with -j MAKEOPTS, a similar build failure is >

[gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with gcc-6.3.0: 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except: - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it (possibly an issue with -j MAKEOPTS, a similar build failure is mentioned in bug 515968 although