On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:16 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> > So what would you recommend for someone in the case Joost cites? I'm in that
> > position, being a home user of a small network but no registered Internet
> > name.
> >
>
>
Karl:
> Michael Orilitzky:
Sorry, I mistyped, it should be: Peter Humphrey
> ...
> > * The LetsEncrypt certificates expire after three months, as opposedÂ
> > to 10+ years for a self-signed certificate. You're supposed toÂ
> > automate this... by running a script as root that takes input
Michael Orilitzky:
...
> * The LetsEncrypt certificates expire after three months, as opposedÂ
> to 10+ years for a self-signed certificate. You're supposed toÂ
> automate this... by running a script as root that takes input fromÂ
> the web? I'd rather not do that.
You can run most part
Joost:
> On Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:44:47 PM CEST k...@aspodata.se wrote:
... [ about letsencrypt ] ...
> It's not that easy to do it with internal-only systems as Let's Encrypt
> requires the hostname to be known externally.
> And there are plenty of devices you do not want the whole internet
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 13:16:59 BST Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > So what would you recommend for someone in the case Joost cites? I'm in
> > that position, being a home user of a small network but no registered
> > Internet name.
>
> A
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> So what would you recommend for someone in the case Joost cites? I'm in that
> position, being a home user of a small network but no registered Internet
> name.
>
A self-signed certificate combined with a browser extension that lets
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 12:40:28 BST Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:17 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > It's not that easy to do it with internal-only systems as Let's Encrypt
> > requires the hostname to be known externally.
> > And there are plenty of devices you do not want
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:17 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> It's not that easy to do it with internal-only systems as Let's Encrypt
> requires the hostname to be known externally.
> And there are plenty of devices you do not want the whole internet to know
> about.
>
And in this situation
On Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:44:47 PM CEST k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> BillK:
> ...
>
> > And another "wondering" - all the warnings about trusting self signed
> > certs seem a bit self serving. Yes, they are trying to certify who you
> > are, but at the expense of probably allowing access to your
>
BillK:
...
> And another "wondering" - all the warnings about trusting self signed
> certs seem a bit self serving. Yes, they are trying to certify who you
> are, but at the expense of probably allowing access to your
> communications by "authorised parties" (such as commercial entities
>
10 matches
Mail list logo