Re: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-26 Thread Eric Martin
On 10/26/07, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since you didn't specify how you determined that it has only 131G, perhaps you should check with fdisk to see what the actual capacity is? The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for that drive: Maximum Capacity

RE: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Carter
Anyway, this is where things get even stranger. I've quadruple-checked and I still don't believe it. The Maxtor drive now PASSES smartctl -H and the new one FAILS. The Maxtor still gets the dma_intr errors in dmesg and the Samsung is said to have it's DMA disabled which contradicts the BIOS,

Re: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread maxim wexler
Since you didn't specify how you determined that it has only 131G, perhaps you should check with fdisk to see what the actual capacity is? The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for that drive: Maximum Capacity [131071MB], fdisk sees the whole 160G. On my way to check the

RE: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Carter
The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for that drive: Maximum Capacity [131071MB], fdisk sees the whole 160G. In that case I'd look for a BIOS update. (FWIW 128 x 1024 = 131072). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list