On 15 July 2011, at 04:18, Grant wrote:
...
Thanks, I went with a Ubiquiti SR71-E (ath9k) and miniPCIe-PCIe
adapter. miniPCIe cards seem to be the only well-supported ones with
a really full feature set.
The market for miniPCIe wifi cards is surely much *much* larger than for
full-sized
On Friday 15 July 2011 15:53:28 Stroller wrote:
Every new laptop needs a wifi card, and that'll be miniPCIe. If someone
is adding wifi to their desktop, then they'll probably use a USB NIC.
When the manufacturer is already making lots of miniPCIe cards, what's
the point of making full-sized
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2011 15:53:28 Stroller wrote:
Every new laptop needs a wifi card, and that'll be miniPCIe. If someone
is adding wifi to their desktop, then they'll probably use a USB NIC.
When the manufacturer
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Sorry - dont know how to tell if can use 2.4 and 5.
It supports 2.4GHz only.
Thanks, I went with a Ubiquiti SR71-E (ath9k) and
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I need only one wireless card in my router to connect to both
the clients and a wireless bridge which is connected to the WAN?
I think you need 2 cards in your router (one as host and one as client
to the wireless WAN
Should I need only one wireless card in my router to connect to both
the clients and a wireless bridge which is connected to the WAN?
I think you need 2 cards in your router (one as host and one as client
to the wireless WAN bridge), unless you use WDS.
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news because it means I can use any
802.11n PCIe 300Mbps card with Linux drivers instead of worrying about
AP mode. I'll just use a 802.11g card in AP mode until there is
better support for 802.11n. The router uses most of the bandwidth
from the WAN.
Hi
Got it, thanks Paul. That's good news because it means I can use any
802.11n PCIe 300Mbps card with Linux drivers instead of worrying about
AP mode. I'll just use a 802.11g card in AP mode until there is
better support for 802.11n. The router uses most of the bandwidth
from the WAN.
Hi
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Its certainly counter-intuitive, but that's what I found when I
searched N configuration. I have had better than 54M bit rates
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Sorry - dont know how to tell if can use 2.4 and 5.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. It looks like you are using it in AP mode but in 802.11g
mode. Is that the case? I'm also curious if it can operate in both
the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands?
Sorry - dont know how to tell if can use 2.4 and 5.
It
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll need an 802.11n PCI-E card that does 300Mbps and works in AP mode
for the router. Does anyone know of such a card? I've read that
these 300 Mbps cards use Realtek chips and don't work in AP mode
although that info could
I'll need an 802.11n PCI-E card that does 300Mbps and works in AP mode
for the router. Does anyone know of such a card? I've read that
these 300 Mbps cards use Realtek chips and don't work in AP mode
although that info could be outdated:
Check out the table here:
13 matches
Mail list logo
