-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2006 01:32
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Max Number of Partitions
Um, activate the vg in partial mode and lvols on the good
disk will still
Michael Kintzios wrote:
Two quick Q's:
Current partitions 1, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are NTFS. As I understand it
LVM is a software solution that works happily with Linux.
Yes. And only Linux - meaning, that if you'd boot
FreeBSD or Solaris, you won't be able to use your
filesystems.
What
On Monday 13 February 2006 08:54, Michael Kintzios
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'RE: [gentoo-user] Max Number
of Partitions':
Current partitions 1, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are NTFS. As I understand it
LVM is a software solution that works happily with Linux. What happens
when my other half
Francesco Riosa wrote:
Someone, somewhere, one time told me that lvm could address that in
some manner but I've never seen how.
Easy - with LVM, you (ideally) don't create any partitions. Instead,
you create so called logical volumes (LVs). On those LVs, you
the filesystems.
Alexander Skwar
Shawn Haggett wrote:
LVM would indeed be a solution. Instead of creating many disk
partitions, you would simply create one large one the size of the disk.
Yes, you could. But if you go that way, you don't have to create
any partitions at all. Instead, you can also use /dev/hda with
LVM.
Then
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Shawn Haggett wrote:
LVM would indeed be a solution. Instead of creating many disk
partitions, you would simply create one large one the size of the disk.
Yes, you could. But if you go that way, you don't have to create
any partitions at all. Instead, you can also use
On Sunday 12 February 2006 06:45, Jarry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Max Number of Partitions':
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Shawn Haggett wrote:
LVM would indeed be a solution. Instead of creating many disk
partitions, you would simply create one large one the size
Jarry wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Shawn Haggett wrote:
LVM would indeed be a solution. Instead of creating many disk
partitions, you would simply create one large one the size of the disk.
Yes, you could. But if you go that way, you don't have to create
any partitions at all. Instead, you
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 12 February 2006 06:45, Jarry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Max Number of Partitions':
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Shawn Haggett wrote:
LVM would indeed be a solution. Instead of creating many disk
partitions, you would simply create
On Sunday 12 February 2006 16:12, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
/hda1 -- /boot as big as you need it. I use 1G, but that's overkill for
most people.
Can't help being curious - how much of that space do you actually use??
I currently use 48 MB on /boot.
--
Bo Andresen
--
On 2/12/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of some obsure case where the code or data needed to read swap
has been swapped out.
BTW, I have been using swap on LVM (on an encrypted PV) for quite some
time, without any trouble, including using suspend-to-ram and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Riosa wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I think that I have run out of partitions:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/dsichelp/ds6000ic/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.storage.smric.help.doc/f2c_linuxscsilimit_2hsag9.html
Although I have
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I think that I have run out of partitions:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/dsichelp/ds6000ic/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.storage.smric.help.doc/f2c_linuxscsilimit_2hsag9.html
Although I have created up to 17 partitions on a SATA, I cannot mount
them. :-(
Before
13 matches
Mail list logo
