On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:36:05PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 2/25/06, Bruce Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BoardName RV350 [MOBILITY RADEON X600]
The opensource xorg/kernel drivers do not support DRI with this
chip.
But they are working on it.
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:30:48 -0600
Bruce Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:36:05PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
My real issue is that fglrx worked under Suse 9.2,
and not under Gentoo. But, no, I am NOT going back. Try
installing xfishtank under
On Saturday 25 February 2006 18:50, Bo Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2006 00:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
But it's working now. So tell us how many frames glxgears is doing
now, with and without radeon. :)
Actually the results using dri is worse than the results without dri in
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:13, Bo Andresen wrote:
I am very surprised by this but it turns out direct rendering is working
now with the kernel modules. And the performance is quite a bit better than
before:
[SNIP]
Well, when I conducted the tests that yielded a performance of 228 FPS with
Bo Andresen wrote:
The previous kernel had dri compiled as
modules and I have never had direct rendering working with it...
until now..
I am very surprised by this but it turns out direct rendering is
working now with the kernel modules.
Are you certain that the radeon module being used is
Richard Fish wrote:
On 2/25/06, Bruce Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BoardName RV350 [MOBILITY RADEON X600]
The opensource xorg/kernel drivers do not support DRI with this
chip.
But they are working on it. If someone wishes to try it out,
upgrade to modular Xorg (7.0), and get
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 21:31, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
The previous kernel had dri compiled as
modules and I have never had direct rendering working with it...
until now..
I am very surprised by this but it turns out direct rendering is
working now with the
Bo Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 21:31, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Are you certain that the radeon module being used is the one
from that old kernel and not the one from x11-drm?
I am very certain... but then again, I've been so before in this
thread and yet been terribly
While the two kernels are the same version from portage they have of course
different EXTRAVERSION. For the kernel I compiled for dri I simply added
'-dri' to EXTRAVERSION. So when running uname -r it yielded 2.6.15-r1-dri.
The previous kernel which I am running now lacks the '-dri'.
On
Bo Andresen wrote:
Is there a way to disable dri for this test without restarting X?
Good question. I don't know. What I do is simply move the driver
in /usr/lib/modules/dri/ out of the way, or renaming it temporarily
(to say NOTradeon_dri.so).
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bruce Burden wrote:
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
radeon 98464 0
drm61592 1 radeon
agpgart27216 1 drm
There should also be an agp module specific for your chipset.
[fglrx:firegl_stub_register] *ERROR* Unable to the open
On Saturday 25 February 2006 15:03, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
Is there a way to disable dri for this test without restarting X?
Good question. I don't know. What I do is simply move the driver
in /usr/lib/modules/dri/ out of the way, or renaming it temporarily
(to say
On Saturday 25 February 2006 00:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
But it's working now. So tell us how many frames glxgears is doing
now, with and without radeon. :)
Actually the results using dri is worse than the results without dri in terms
of frame rates. Without dri I get something like 250
Okay, I have decided to use the xorg DRM module. However, I am
still doing something wrong:
name of display: tigerprowl:0.0
Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display :0.0.
display: tigerprowl:0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string:
On Sunday 26 February 2006 05:02, Bruce Burden wrote:
Okay, I have decided to use the xorg DRM module. However, I am
still doing something wrong:
First of all did you follow the guide at http://www.gentoolinux.org/doc/en/dri-howto.xml ? Or any other guide?
Assuming you used the guided
On 2/25/06, Bruce Burden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I have decided to use the xorg DRM module. However, I am
still doing something wrong:
snip
BoardName RV350 [MOBILITY RADEON X600]
The opensource xorg/kernel drivers do not support DRI with this chip.
You can verify
Bo Andresen wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:04, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Maybe try again, taking extra
care to avoid typos in VIDEO_CARDS=ati?
I did do that. And as stated before it won't compile without the
VIDEO_CARDS variable in it's environment. Tried several times
with both ati
On Friday 24 February 2006 20:14, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:04, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Maybe try again, taking extra
care to avoid typos in VIDEO_CARDS=ati?
I did do that. And as stated before it won't compile without the
VIDEO_CARDS
Bo Andresen wrote:
I was very sure that I had tested this twice with
VIDEO_CARDS=ati. Both times the ati flag didn't get enabled
That's why I said to take extra care to avoid typos. :)
i.e. emerge -vp x11-drm showed:
[ebuild R ] x11-base/x11-drm-20051223 VIDEO_CARDS=-ati
-i810 -mga
On Saturday 25 February 2006 00:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
But it's working now. So tell us how many frames glxgears is doing
now, with and without radeon. :)
Is there a way to disable dri for this test without restarting X?
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bruce Burden wrote:
Is it in the portage system? I did a sync a few weeks
ago, and I still get the 20050502 version,
Do an 'eix x11-drm' and see it lists a 20051223 version, keyword
masked. (If you don't have
Bo Andresen wrote:
I don't have a kernel module called radeon. I guess that's the
problem..
Aah! But that module is provided by x11-base/x11-drm. Maybe you
need to add the video_cards_ati USE flag?
You are suggesting I move to version udev-084?
Only when you have the radeon module and it
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:04, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
Do you think this is a bug in the ebuild?
No. But maybe it is a bug in the newer version of portage that you
use, because here the VIDEO_CARDS=via gets autoconverted to the
video_cards_via USE flag. Maybe try
On Friday 17 February 2006 12:20, Ghaith Hachem wrote:
havn't tried it since i have a newer unspoorted ship (X300SE)
but try this guide here
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_DRI_with_ATi_Open-Source_Drivers
I'll try that howto when I get some time... Thanks.
--
Bo Andresen
--
Bruce Burden wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 07:29:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
[ebuild R ] x11-base/x11-drm-20050502 0 kB
There's a much more recent version of this, have you tried
that?
Is it in the portage system? I did a sync a few weeks
As I've read in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_DRI_with_ATi_Open-Source_Drivers
there's no way to make it work for a Radeon above 9100. Oh !! mine is
Mobility Radeon 9700, if I want DRI through open source drivers, I've no way
to do it?
Bye,
Rafael Fernández López.
pgp9zokH8act6.pgp
--- Rafael Fernández López
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've read in
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_DRI_with_ATi_Open-Source_Drivers
there's no way to make it work for a Radeon above
9100. Oh !! mine is
Mobility Radeon 9700, if I want DRI through open
source drivers, I've no way
to do it?
havn't tried it since i have a newer unspoorted ship (X300SE)
but try this guide here
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_DRI_with_ATi_Open-Source_Drivers
On 2/17/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a laptop with a ATI Radeon 9000 Mobility graphics card. I wanted to get
3d rendering
--- Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~# lsmod | grep 'drm\|agp'
drm65944 0
intel_agp 20508 1
agpgart29256 2 drm,intel_agp
There should also be a drm_radeon there (not sure how
it's called because I use it builtin the kernel)
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 07:29:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Bo Andresen wrote:
[ebuild R ] x11-base/x11-drm-20050502 0 kB
There's a much more recent version of this, have you tried that?
Is it in the portage system? I did a sync a few weeks
ago, and I still get the
30 matches
Mail list logo
