Hi,
no, it would not.
gcc would simply refuse to work, because CHOST=pentium4-pc-linux-gnu
is not a valid CHOST.
CHOST describes the platform you build on. For optimizations take a
look at CFLAGS.
And by the way: Changing CHOST is not worth the trouble. Even if it
would be possible in your case,
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:18:17 am Benedikt Morbach wrote:
Hi,
no, it would not.
gcc would simply refuse to work, because CHOST=pentium4-pc-linux-gnu
is not a valid CHOST.
CHOST describes the platform you build on. For optimizations take a
look at CFLAGS.
Where do I find a list of
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Would the compiler then be optimized for the pentium4 and thus run a
tad bit faster?
See Benedikt's answer for why you should not go down this road.
If you did get it all to work right, and suffered through the emerge -e
world required, your
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 10:35:34 am Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Should be interesting... It'll lay to rest what everyone speculates
or postulates. :')
No need. Been done. Question answered long ago. You are beating a dead
horse. We already
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Should be interesting... It'll lay to rest what everyone speculates
or postulates. :')
No need. Been done. Question answered long ago. You are beating a dead
horse. We already know *exactly* what difference it makes - precious
little.
You
Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:40:30 am Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Would the compiler then be optimized for the pentium4 and thus run a
tad bit faster?
See Benedikt's answer for why you should not go down this
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:40:30 am Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Would the compiler then be optimized for the pentium4 and thus run a
tad bit faster?
See Benedikt's answer for why you should not go down this road.
If you did get it all to work
Benedikt Morbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
no, it would not.
gcc would simply refuse to work, because CHOST=pentium4-pc-linux-gnu
is not a valid CHOST.
CHOST describes the platform you build on. For optimizations take a
look at CFLAGS.
Though looking at /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 10:28:01 am Dale wrote:
Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:40:30 am Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Would the compiler then be optimized for the pentium4 and thus run a
tad bit faster?
See Benedikt's
Jerry McBride wrote:
Thanks for the offer. I'm almost finished the re-compiling stuff however. Why
not post the script anyways? Someone else may be doing the same thing.
Cheers.
It is attached. It's been around a while so I assume it still works. I
put mine in the /root directory
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Jerry McBride wrote:
Are the numbers posted somewhere I can get to? It'd be good reading.
Google knows where they are.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
