Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-08 Thread BRM
--- Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 13:16 -0800, BRM wrote: [snip] However, that is not a solution I can use as I might not be the long term maintainer, and I'd like an easier solution as it requires a lot of work to download stuff. I'd like a solution

Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-08 Thread Per-Erik Westerberg
tor 2008-01-03 klockan 13:16 -0800 skrev BRM: I have a couple Sparc systems. One has been running Gentoo for a long time - installed using Gentoo 2006, not updated since due to the issue I'm about the discuss - and the other is a near identical system that might get Gentoo 2007 installed.

Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-08 Thread BRM
--- Per-Erik Westerberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tor 2008-01-03 klockan 13:16 -0800 skrev BRM: I have a couple Sparc systems. One has been running Gentoo for a long time - installed using Gentoo 2006, not updated since due to the issue I'm about the discuss - and the other is a near

Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-08 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On Jan 8, 2008 7:13 PM, BRM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Per-Erik Westerberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tor 2008-01-03 klockan 13:16 -0800 skrev BRM: I have a couple Sparc systems. One has been running Gentoo for a long time - installed using Gentoo 2006, not updated since due to the

Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-08 Thread BRM
--- Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 8, 2008 7:13 PM, BRM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Per-Erik Westerberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tor 2008-01-03 klockan 13:16 -0800 skrev BRM: I have a couple Sparc systems. One has been running Gentoo for a long time - installed

Re: [gentoo-user] How to update portage offline with minimal impact?

2008-01-06 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 13:16 -0800, BRM wrote: [snip] However, that is not a solution I can use as I might not be the long term maintainer, and I'd like an easier solution as it requires a lot of work to download stuff. I'd like a solution similar to the following: # tar xvjf