On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:41 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
I think btrfs has tremendous potential. I tried ZFS a few times,
but the installs are not part of gentoo, so they got borked
uEFI, grubs to uuids, etc etc also were in the mix. That was almost
a year ago. For what ever
On Friday, September 19, 2014 01:41:26 PM James wrote:
J. Roeleveld joost at antarean.org writes:
Out of curiosity, what do you want to simulate?
subsurface flows in porous medium. AKA carbon sequestration
by injection wells. You know, provide proof that those
that remove hydrocarbons and
On Friday, September 19, 2014 10:56:59 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:41 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
I think btrfs has tremendous potential. I tried ZFS a few times,
but the installs are not part of gentoo, so they got borked
uEFI, grubs to uuids, etc etc
On 18/09/2014 14:12, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
On 09/18/2014 05:17 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 17/09/2014 21:20, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 09:05:09 PM James wrote:
J. Roeleveld joost at antarean.org writes:
AFS has caching and can survive temporary disappearance of the
server.
Excellent for low bandwidth connections. Most DFS have mechanisms to
deal with transient failures, but not as
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 04:20:24 PM Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless you're doing a massively parallel read (what it was
designed for). I
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 08:56:28 PM James wrote:
Alec Ten Harmsel alec at alectenharmsel.com writes:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless you're doing a massively
On 17/09/2014 21:20, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless you're doing a massively parallel read (what it was
designed for). I can elaborate why if anyone
The HTML...it hurts my eyes... :)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:24 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 08:56:28 PM James wrote:
Alec Ten Harmsel alec at alectenharmsel.com writes:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 05:48:58 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
The HTML...it hurts my eyes... :)
Apologies.
My current understanding is:
- ZFS is production ready, but due to licensing issues, not included in
the
kernel
- BTRFS is included, but not yet production ready with
On 09/18/2014 05:17 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 17/09/2014 21:20, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless you're doing a massively parallel read (what it
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 03:55:56 PM James wrote:
J. Roeleveld joost at antarean.org writes:
Distributed File Systems (DFS):
Local (Device) File Systems LFS:
Is my understanding correct that the top list all require one of
the bottom list?
Eg. the clustering FSs only
As far as HDFS goes, I would only set that up if you will use it for
Hadoop or related tools. It's highly specific, and the performance is
not good unless you're doing a massively parallel read (what it was
designed for). I can elaborate why if anyone is actually interested.
We use Lustre for our
13 matches
Mail list logo
