Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:33:38 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: Same here, still no fix (was to be expected, but had to try). Now emerging 2.02.04-r1 (03, 04 are gone, 02-r1 is back) have some new patches. I've just emerged 2.02.04-r1 and it rebooted fine. -- Neil Bothwick Windows booting: insert

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-21 Thread Alexander Skwar
Christer Ekholm wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After updating lvm2 from 2.02.02 to 2.02.03, the system mount / which is on a primary partition but frefus to mount /usr,/var,/home and /tmp. On the console I see: Setting up the logical volume manager Volume group for uuid not found:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:41:09 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: WARN: postinst An old version of an installed library was detected on your system. In order to avoid breaking packages that link against it, this older version is not being removed. In order to make full use of this newer version,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-21 Thread Rumen Yotov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christer Ekholm wrote: Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hm, did yo note the following warning? WARN: postinst An old version of an installed library was detected on your system. In order to avoid breaking packages that link against

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:07:38 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: The problem here seems to be that LVM2 (which is build statically, and no static USE-flag present). sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.03 Checked - is a static binary, but must somehow be build against the older library (code), so the said

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System unusable after updating lvm

2006-04-21 Thread Rumen Yotov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:07:38 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: The problem here seems to be that LVM2 (which is build statically, and no static USE-flag present). sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.03 Checked - is a static binary, but must somehow be