Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 19:03, Dominus Mundi wrote:
>> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
>> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
>> opinions of people from your time.
>> --
>> Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your
170108 wabe wrote:
> Dominus Mundi wrote:
>> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
>> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
>> opinions of people from your time. -- Securely sent with Tutanota.
>> Claim your
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Gevisz wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 11:47:24 -0600 Dale wrote:
>
>> wabe wrote:
>> > Dominus Mundi wrote:
>
> May be, it is in somebody business plan to start such threads just
> after the New Year
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 11:47:24 -0600 Dale wrote:
> wabe wrote:
> > Dominus Mundi wrote:
> >
> >> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
> >> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
> >>
On 08/01/2017 19:03, Dominus Mundi wrote:
>
> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
> opinions of people from your time.
> --
> Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
wabe wrote:
> Dominus Mundi wrote:
>
>> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
>> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
>> opinions of people from your time. -- Securely sent with Tutanota.
>> Claim your
Dominus Mundi wrote:
> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly
> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the
> opinions of people from your time. -- Securely sent with Tutanota.
> Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
7 matches
Mail list logo