Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

On Monday 11 Jan 2016 20:10:53 Stroller wrote: > > On Mon, 11 January 2016, at 6:48 p.m., waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > The other problem is that HTML5 sucks up more CPU for video. My data > > > > point with an ancient underpowered Atom netbook watching a Youtube music > > video

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

> On Mon, 11 January 2016, at 6:48 p.m., waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > The other problem is that HTML5 sucks up more CPU for video. My data > point with an ancient underpowered Atom netbook watching a Youtube music > video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwqhdRs4jyA > > Flash > = > 1)

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

> I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to > packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I > have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there > isn't or I can't find it one. I found a bug report on the version I > have

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to > packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I > have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there >

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote: > Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com, nfl.com, wfpl.org, AT > Uverse, among others. ... bbc.co.uk ... -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google Chrome has pepper flash by default On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, 10:54 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com,

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe flash warning and tree

On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 18:39:43 Ian Bloss wrote: > You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google > Chrome has pepper flash by default For Chromium you can install: www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash replacement ?

On Friday 23 Oct 2015 10:24:42 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 22 October 2015 21:38:50 Marc Joliet wrote: > > Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly two weeks > > and 2 hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and youtube-dl (well, > > mpv's built-in youtube-dl

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash replacement ?

On Thursday 22 October 2015 21:38:50 Marc Joliet wrote: > Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly two weeks and > 2 hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and youtube-dl (well, mpv's > built-in youtube-dl support) helps with the few sites that still don't > support

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash replacement ?

On Thursday 22 October 2015 18:01:10 James wrote: >Hello, > >I was just reading about "lighspark" [1] and at first glance, it seems >to be a replacement for adobe flash with support for the latest >features. Lightspark can be found with:: >'eix -R lightspark' > > >You may also need to run

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash replacement ?

On четверг, 22 октября 2015 г. 22:38:50 MSK, Marc Joliet wrote: I tried that a good while ago, but at the time I had no luck. However, that was a few years ago. Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly two weeks and 2 hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago. Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with the ebuild. It is important to update,

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago. https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash Try a different mirror.

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

OK, thanks -- its here now, just a slow mirror. Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago. https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash Try a

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:11 I wrote: On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Saturday 26 July 2014 10:46:35 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:11 I wrote: On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Friday 25 July 2014 06:45:35 Mick wrote: On Wednesday 23 Jul 2014 10:00:00 Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I know). Have you looked at the get_iplayer

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I know). Have you looked at the get_iplayer script? No, I hadn't heard of it.

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I know). Have you looked at

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to override the portage checksums and say install anyway? Are you using http-replicator? Its not clever enough to know that the installer has changed since the

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

Are you using http-replicator? Its not clever enough to know that the installer has changed since the filename doesn't change, and keeps serving up the first one it downloads. If you remove the installer first from replicator's --dir, it will work. Dammit - I should look more closely at the

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Tuesday 22 July 2014 20:41:34 Bill Kenworthy wrote: On 22/07/14 19:48, Dale wrote: Bill Kenworthy wrote: On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Wednesday 23 Jul 2014 10:00:00 Peter Humphrey wrote: I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I know). Have you looked at the get_iplayer script? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to override the portage

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:05:43 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to override the portage

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I have to update them

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 07:31:35 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

Bill Kenworthy wrote: On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest rebuild first. As I

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash

On 22/07/14 19:48, Dale wrote: Bill Kenworthy wrote: On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update because the checksums fail so you have to manually force

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

David Haller wrote: Hello, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Dale wrote: `/usr/portage/distfiles/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235.i386.tar.gz' saved 11.2.202.235 crashes all the time anyway (at least on x86_64), there's a new version 11.2.202.236 out since yesterday or so that works again. HTH, -dnh I been

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

Hello, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Dale wrote: `/usr/portage/distfiles/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235.i386.tar.gz' saved 11.2.202.235 crashes all the time anyway (at least on x86_64), there's a new version 11.2.202.236 out since yesterday or so that works again. HTH, -dnh -- The speed at which a mistyped

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

On Monday 11 Jun 2012 14:46:19 Dale wrote: Top posting for obvious reasons. ;-) I was thinking it could be this but this is the first time I have ever ran into this with adobe-flash. I wanted to sort of check into it before doing anything that may cause issues' such as just redoing the

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

Mick wrote: Haven't tried the latest, but it has happened here too in the past. I recall following pretty much what you've done to resolve this problem (except for the replicator thing). I seem to recall that on one occasion I had to try again the next day to get it to work, because I did not

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

I get this, commonly with adobe-flash and google-earth. I suspect that they change the file content or dynamically regenerate it faster than portage can track them/my local repos update. The only fix I have been able to come up with is check as far as possible where the binary came from and

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash and constant errors.

Top posting for obvious reasons. ;-) I was thinking it could be this but this is the first time I have ever ran into this with adobe-flash. I wanted to sort of check into it before doing anything that may cause issues' such as just redoing the manifest. I did think about it tho. Now to go

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem. Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread. I run stable Gentoo + a few

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

Doesn't Google bundle a version of flash with their browser? Or is that something that's coming in the future? I had flash crashing a lot on my machine, and just disabled hardware acceleration in the settings to fix it. Alecks Gates, sent from Android on an HTC G2 On May 6, 2012 10:28 AM, Mark

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

SNIP I thought I'd report back that while Flash continues to crash on this machine only even with updates to both Firefox adobe-flash, I tried Google Chrome this morning and it works perfectly. I appears the root cause of this problem would be Firefox, not Flash or nvidia-drivers, and I

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote Do you have a really old Intel CPU, or an AMD before the K8 version? Old Intels and and pre-K8 AMDs don't support SSE2, which is used in the latest Flash binaries. Using instructions that don't exist on your CPU == crash city.

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: And why adobe stops the linux-support? They are backing away from Flash in general across all platforms. Android and Linux are first announced. Most of the thousands of workers recently laid-off at Adobe are from the Flash area, from

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [12-04-28 04:56]: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [12-04-28 00:20]: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem. Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread. I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an NVidia 463 GTX. Since the update to

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem. Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread. I run stable Gentoo + a few

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an NVidia 463 GTX. Since the update to adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 a few weeks ago all Flash apps crash the plugin within Firefox. I posted a bug report here and got shot down for reasons I don't understand. (I understand what he

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks, I'll keep trying. Cheers, Mark I was diggin around to see if I could help in some small way but found something weird here. I have the 11.1 version installed. It's not in the tree tho. Since I have it installed, could I send you the ebuild and you put it in

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [12-04-28 00:20]: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem. Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread. I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 + nvidia crashing

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [12-04-28 00:20]: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem. Hopefully I haven't missed the

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe-flash becomes quite slow.

I use strace to trace syscalls of `/opt/Adobe/flash-player/libflashplayer.so` and found many errors like this: {{{ madvise(0xdf2, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf2, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe-flash becomes quite slow.

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:56:56PM +0800, Einux wrote: Here's my lspci result: {{{ 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub (rev 07) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port (rev

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe-flash becomes quite slow.

On Friday 01 April 2011 22:35:39 Einux wrote: Adobe-flash becomes quite slow in my laptop after I updated world(or maybe I reconfigured kernel options) several days ago. I've made a lot of modifications, so I'm not sure exactly which action leads to the malfunction of adobe-flash. adobe flash

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash (10.1.53.64) Not Working

On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote: Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe Flash is not installed or to download the plugin. In my /etc/make.conf I had to change ACCEPT_LICENSE to

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash (10.1.53.64) Not Working

On Sunday 27 June 2010 16:00:04 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote: Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe Flash is not installed or to download the plugin. In my

Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe Flash (10.1.53.64) Not Working

On 06/27/2010 12:03 PM, Mick wrote: On Sunday 27 June 2010 16:00:04 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote: Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe Flash is not installed or to