cov...@ccs.covici.com writes:
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently this
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to
S_ISCHR. I tried to
Arttu V. arttu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
after doing this at least one package had an undefined
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did
opine thusly:
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:29 on Sunday 22 August 2010, Arttu V. did
opine thusly:
On 8/22/10, cov...@ccs.covici.com cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged --
amoung other
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
quickpkg glibc
move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay.
Edit it and find the check that disallows downgrades.
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
quickpkg glibc
move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay.
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:44 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
There is a way to downgrade for
On Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
quickpkg glibc
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:28 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Besides, if I don't give them some form of responsibility they will
never become responsible.
Unfortunately, the converse is not
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic juniors
who blindly run emerge -uND world and walk away thinking Unix always
works like RedHat.
Why do
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:49 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
But for critical production machines? Not a flying chance in hell :-)
Too many times I've had to sort out the carnage from idiotic
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:55:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Besides, if I don't give them some form of responsibility they will
never become responsible.
Unfortunately, the converse is not necessarily true :(
--
Neil Bothwick
We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully
I have glibc-2.12.1 running on two ~x86 systems with no problems so far.
Hi,
Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1, and
downgrading that package is decidedly non-trivial. Only comment I can find at
this early
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 15:21:35 Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 09:33:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi,
Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1,
and downgrading that package is decidedly
Em 17-08-2010 12:34, Alan McKinnon escreveu:
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 15:21:35 Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 09:33:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi,
Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1,
and
Hi Alan, a suggestion - for mission critical clone one of your systems
into a vm (dd), get it working, upgrade and test.
Or clone to a chroot and do the same.
Not quite 100% - but allows some peace of mind!
BillK
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 17:34 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August
17 matches
Mail list logo
