On 2014-01-11 10:06 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/08/2014 01:03 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Could this have anything to do with the fact that I don't have either of
these set in /etc/portage/make.comf:
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_3
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET=python2_7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2014 01:03 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Could this have anything to do with the fact that I don't have either of
these set in /etc/portage/make.comf:
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_3
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET=python2_7
You really do not want to
On 08/01/2014 20:03, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-01-08 11:54 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I just updated glibc to 2.1.17, and got the following error at the very
end of the emerge:
/usr/bin/python2.7: relocation error: /lib64/libresolv.so.2: symbol
__sendmmsg, version
On 2014-01-09 4:24 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/01/2014 20:03, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-01-08 11:54 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I just updated glibc to 2.1.17, and got the following error at the very
end of the emerge:
/usr/bin/python2.7:
On 2014-01-08 11:54 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I just updated glibc to 2.1.17, and got the following error at the very
end of the emerge:
/usr/bin/python2.7: relocation error: /lib64/libresolv.so.2: symbol
__sendmmsg, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with
On Friday 20 March 2009 03:52:10 Jorge Morais wrote:
This was a doubt of mine. One of the reasons I prefer to use a stable
kernel is that I don't know if, when using a newer (and ~x86) kernel,
I should also use the corresponding linux-headers version. So you say
I can be 99.999% sure that,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:49:12 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
msoul...@anton:~$ equery belongs /usr/include/linux/quota.h
[ Searching for file(s) /usr/include/linux/quota.h in *... ]
sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.23-r3 (/usr/include/linux/quota.h)
ul...@anton:~$ uname -a
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 13:23:47 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hello,
Looking at what I'm about to pick up via emerge, I notice this
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 [2.6.1]
This immediately sets off alarm bells for me, since glibc is the basis of
the whole system. If I pick
On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
You said glibc is the basis of the whole system. That's not quite true,
it's actually glibc provides the C library, which is a collection of basic
function calls that just about every other program uses sooner or later
I wasn't sure if any interface changes had
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 20:05:27 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Sometimes, glibc is all fsck'ed up. Like sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1.
It looks great, till you start firefox and find that it doesn't run
anymore...
So, how would I know, in general, whether it's safe to upgrade when it
On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
Well, this is gentoo and we don't need no stinking Changelogs on gentoo :-)
:)
Seriously, you are running a stable arch. All known issues should be resolved
by the time glibc hits stable. You can always askhere, or look at b.g.o for
any outstanding issues
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
Seriously, you are running a stable arch. All known issues should be resolved
by the time glibc hits stable. You can always askhere, or look at b.g.o for
any outstanding issues
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 23:43:50 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
Well, this is gentoo and we don't need no stinking Changelogs on gentoo
:-)
:)
:
Seriously, you are running a stable arch. All known issues should be
resolved by the time glibc hits stable.
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Hi,
Before I file this as a bug I'd like to make sure it's not caused by
something wrong with my system. Please help me determine that.
In the past two days I was trying to upgrade my glibc from version 2.4
to 2.5. Each time I tried it the emerge process
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Hi,
What happens after this is pretty nasty. Any program that I run segfaults:
# ls
Segmentation fault
Try also using the emergency shell /bin/bb, it should be statically
linked and therefore independent from glibc.
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:56:19 Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov wrote:
Before I file this as a bug I'd like to make sure it's not caused by
something wrong with my system. Please help me determine that.
In the past two days I was trying to upgrade my glibc from version 2.4
to 2.5. Each time I
First of all, thanks for the replies.
Just so you know, I was able to get my system to a working state. Read
the bit about untarring the old glibc into my system in my email.
I don't reallly have a clue if any of those are relevant but have a look
yourself.. Otherwise go ahead and file the bug.
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Try also using the emergency shell /bin/bb, it should be statically
linked and therefore independent from glibc.
Thanks. I had no idea I had that thing.
Me too, but Google is always a bliss. :)
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 8/31/06, Neil Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have nptl and nptlonly in USE (that message had a yellow star, so
I guess it's just a warning) but my CHOST is set to
CHOST=i386-pc-linux-gnu in make.conf. How do I correct this problem?
Assuming you are using a processor made in the last 10
19 matches
Mail list logo
