Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Sebastian Günther
* Andrey Vul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [26.09.08 04:45]: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, AFAIK UDF doesn't support embedded control characters in files (i.e. Icon\r). This claim is of course wrong. I beg

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Andrey Vul
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Andrey Vul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [26.09.08 04:45]: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, AFAIK UDF doesn't support embedded control

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Andrey Vul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [26.09.08 04:45]: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also,

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, AFAIK UDF doesn't support embedded control characters in files (i.e. Icon\r). This claim is of course wrong. I beg to differ.

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Andrey Vul
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Andrey Vul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [26.09.08 04:45]: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-26 Thread Andrey Vul
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Andrey Vul ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-25 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct, but I still see no reason why HFS+ is required. Have you mastered OS X install CD/DVDs using AppleUDF and have them behave identically to HFS+ CD/DVDs? Did you? Why do your answers look as if you were unwilling to even give it a try? Also,

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-25 Thread Andrey Vul
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, AFAIK UDF doesn't support embedded control characters in files (i.e. Icon\r). This claim is of course wrong. I beg to differ. Output of ls -Alh in the Installer.app dir is

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-24 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a hdiutil clone for Linux? mkisofs lacks HFS+ support and my SSE3-capable computer is still compiling KDE. It will take a long while to get OSX inside VMware working. Why do you believe that you need HFS+ at all? mkisofs supports Apple MAC UDF

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-24 Thread Andrey Vul
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a hdiutil clone for Linux? mkisofs lacks HFS+ support and my SSE3-capable computer is still compiling KDE. It will take a long while to get OSX inside VMware working. Why

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-24 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you believe that you need HFS+ at all? Because I have paths which exceed the HFS limit and lead to truncation, in addition to symlinks. Both work incorrectly. E.g., HFS+ directory name: Garritan Instruments for Finale 2009 HFS directory name:

Re: [gentoo-user] hduitil for linux

2008-09-24 Thread Andrey Vul
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you believe that you need HFS+ at all? Because I have paths which exceed the HFS limit and lead to truncation, in addition to symlinks. Both work incorrectly. E.g., HFS+