Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:06:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: I agree that the tree should be in sync, but how come I was able to unmerge the package? It must keep the information somewhere -- and it didn't tell me anything about having packages with no ebuilds -- that would have been OK.

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and gives the rather strange message: Calculating dependencies... done! emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy dev-tex/mplib:0. (dependency required by

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread covici
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and gives the rather strange message: Calculating dependencies... done! emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and gives

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I have a fair number of

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Mark Knecht

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:56 on Monday 13 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild. That results in your tree being out of sync with upstream. That is not allowed. I agree that the tree should be in

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread covici
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently,

Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild will not run at all

2010-12-12 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:41:08 Alan McKinnon wrote: One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild. Eh? Not deleting the ebuild is not a solution? Is that what you meant to say? -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.