[gentoo-user] Problem emerging ATI drivers
I'm getting the following output while emerging x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.32.5. I have no understanding of why this is failing. All help appreciated ---cut--- * Preparing fglrx module make -C /usr/src/linux M=/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.19' CC [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.o /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:452: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function 'firegl_stub_open': /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:575: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function '__ke_request_irq': /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2564: warning: passing argument 2 of 'request_irq' from incompatible pointer type LD [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1 modules CC /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.mod.o LD [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.32.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.ko make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.19' Source compiled. --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-x11-drivers_-_ati-drivers-8.32.5-18092.log open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.19/astest18195.out open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.19/astest18199.out open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.19/astest18209.out open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.19/astest18213.out -- David Corbin Learn more about the FairTax - http://www.fairtax.org -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Changed behaviour of emerge --tree???
I am quite sure that emerge --uupdate --deep --newuse --tree world previously just showed what it would do (in reverse order). It implied --pretend. But now suddenly it starts to actually build stuff. Is something broken or has emerge been changed intentionally? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Changed behaviour of emerge --tree???
On 2/18/07, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am quite sure that emerge --uupdate --deep --newuse --tree world
previously just showed what it would do (in reverse order). It implied
--pretend. But now suddenly it starts to actually build stuff. Is
something broken or has emerge been changed intentionally?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I think --tree used to imply --ask, but upon testing it seems not to.
I always use the -uvatDN or --update --verbose --ask --tree --deep
--newuse string anyway ^_^. verbose shows you the useflags :)
With Verbose:
[ebuild R ] app-portage/eix-0.8.6 USE=sqlite 0 kB
Without Verbose:
[ebuild R ] app-portage/eix-0.8.6
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED][(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] 'Hibernate' by power button
On Friday 16 February 2007 21:19, Alex Schuster wrote: Mick writes: /etc/acpi/default.sh: line 57: syntax error: unexpected end of file The last few of lines of my /etc/acpi/default.sh show this much: == ac_adapter) case $value in # Add code here to handle when the system is... # ;; # Add code here to handle when the system is... # (maybe change cpu scaling to performance mode) #*1) # ;; The inner case statement is not closed by an esac. This is missing (yes, log_unhandled comes twice): *) log_unhandled $* ;; esac ;; *) log_unhandled $* ;; esac emerge -1 acpid should also give you the defaut back. Do a quickpkg acpid before if you changed othr things for yourself you want to keep (this creates a binary package), you can then emerge it again later with emerge -1K acpid. Alex Thank you all, :) The last two lines were missing as you noted above. I've added them and the button now works fine. -- Regards, Mick pgpAkHySa7C2D.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Problem emerging ATI drivers
On 2007-02-17, David Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting the following output while emerging x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.32.5. make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.19' 8.32.5 won't compile as-is with recent kernels. There is a patch available to get it to compile, or you can use a newer ATI-drivers package. But newer ATI-drivers packages don't support some older boards (92xx). A patch for 8.32.5 has been submitted on bugs.gentoo.rog, but the response was screw you, go buy a newer video card. So, I created an overlay and modified the ebuild to get it to work. If you want a copy, it's available at: ftp://ftp.visi.com/users/grante/ati-drivers-8.32.5-r1-overlay.tar.gz -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I brought my BOWLING at BALL -- and some DRUGS!! visi.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] emerge --sync fails
emerge --sync failed on one system today. I tried twice. Here is the end of the output: x11-wm/fluxbox/files/ xfce-base/ xfce-extra/ Number of files: 144867 Number of files transferred: 54 Total file size: 162899536 bytes Total transferred file size: 203819 bytes Literal data: 203819 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list size: 3308769 File list generation time: 17.494 seconds File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds Total bytes sent: 3465 Total bytes received: 3517647 sent 3465 bytes received 3517647 bytes 19188.62 bytes/sec total size is 162899536 speedup is 46.26 Updating Portage cache: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/emerge, line 4049, in ? emerge_main() File /usr/bin/emerge, line 4006, in emerge_main action_sync(settings, trees, mtimedb, myopts, myaction) File /usr/bin/emerge, line 2924, in action_sync action_metadata(settings, portdb, myopts) File /usr/bin/emerge, line 3019, in action_metadata eclass_cache=ec, verbose_instance=noise_maker) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/util.py, line 47, in mirror_cache if trg and not write_it: File /usr/lib/python2.4/UserDict.py, line 170, in __len__ return len(self.keys()) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/mappings.py, line 54, in keys return list(self.__iter__()) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/mappings.py, line 48, in __iter__ for k in self.orig.iterkeys(): File /usr/lib/python2.4/UserDict.py, line 103, in iterkeys return self.__iter__() File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/mappings.py, line 83, in __iter__ return iter(self.keys()) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/mappings.py, line 87, in keys self.d.update(self.pull()) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/flat_hash.py, line 29, in callit return args[0](*args[1:]+args2) File /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/flat_hash.py, line 47, in _pull raise cache_errors.CacheCorruption(cpv, e) cache.cache_errors.CacheCorruption: app-accessibility/SphinxTrain-0.9.1-r1 is corrupt: dictionary update sequence element #0 has length 1; 2 is required -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Changed behaviour of emerge --tree???
On Saturday 17 February 2007 13:15:33 Erik wrote: I am quite sure that emerge --uupdate --deep --newuse --tree world previously just showed what it would do (in reverse order). It implied --pretend. But now suddenly it starts to actually build stuff. Is something broken or has emerge been changed intentionally? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158100 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151250 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166880 -- Bo Andresen pgpeMvgGGrTrA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync fails
On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:45:41 Erik wrote: emerge --sync failed on one system today. I tried twice. Here is the end [SNIP] cache.cache_errors.CacheCorruption: app-accessibility/SphinxTrain-0.9.1-r1 is corrupt: dictionary update sequence element #0 has length 1; 2 is required http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156374 -- Bo Andresen pgpsFrjZWQggU.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. -- Raymond Lewis Rebbeck -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
Hi Alain, On Saturday 17 February 2007 18:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. I had exactly the same problem. When I upgraded from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19, for some reason make oldconfig didn't work (maybe my misunderstanding of it). This meant that though I thought that the old settings were copied across, in fact they weren't. I found the culprit of this to be that the default/generic IDE controller wasn't enabled in the kernel. Try going through your kernel config checking that your IDE/SATA controller is being built. HTH, Pete. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine. People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:41, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine. People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully. The new libata PATA drivers put your hdds under /dev/sd* and your cdroms under /dev/sr* rather than /dev/hd*. So you'll have to either reconfigure your kernel to use the regular IDE drivers or fix all mention of /dev/hd* to the correct /dev/sd* device. -- Raymond Lewis Rebbeck -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
on Sunday 02/18/2007 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:41, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine. People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully. The new libata PATA drivers put your hdds under /dev/sd* and your cdroms under /dev/sr* rather than /dev/hd*. So you'll have to either reconfigure your kernel to use the regular IDE drivers or fix all mention of /dev/hd* to the correct /dev/sd* device. Well, if I do that will I have to have only 15 partitions on an ide drive -- currently I am running on a drive with 17 partitions? Which configs are the old ide drivers and are they going to be maintained? Thanks. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 6:19, John covici wrote: on Sunday 02/18/2007 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:41, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine. People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully. The new libata PATA drivers put your hdds under /dev/sd* and your cdroms under /dev/sr* rather than /dev/hd*. So you'll have to either reconfigure your kernel to use the regular IDE drivers or fix all mention of /dev/hd* to the correct /dev/sd* device. Well, if I do that will I have to have only 15 partitions on an ide drive -- currently I am running on a drive with 17 partitions? Which configs are the old ide drivers and are they going to be maintained? I've never heard of any 15 partition limit. The old ide drivers are the CONFIG_IDE drivers that you'd have been using previously. They are likely to be maintained for the forseeable future. The libata PATA drivers are considered experimental and do not yet implement all the functionality and device support of the existing ide drivers. -- Raymond Lewis Rebbeck -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 6:29, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 6:19, John covici wrote: on Sunday 02/18/2007 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:41, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6. When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome. -- ~adj~ It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names. You should double check that all your required drivers have been configured. I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine. People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully. The new libata PATA drivers put your hdds under /dev/sd* and your cdroms under /dev/sr* rather than /dev/hd*. So you'll have to either reconfigure your kernel to use the regular IDE drivers or fix all mention of /dev/hd* to the correct /dev/sd* device. Well, if I do that will I have to have only 15 partitions on an ide drive -- currently I am running on a drive with 17 partitions? Which configs are the old ide drivers and are they going to be maintained? I've never heard of any 15 partition limit. The old ide drivers are the CONFIG_IDE drivers that you'd have been using previously. They are likely to be maintained for the forseeable future. The libata PATA drivers are considered experimental and do not yet implement all the functionality and device support of the existing ide drivers. I shouldn't have replied so quickly. A quick google does seem to indicate that the libata pata drivers suffer from a 15 partition limit imposed by the scsi subsystem it uses. A possible solution is using LVM or similar. -- Raymond Lewis Rebbeck -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
Hi, please forgive this most probably very simple question, but I cannot find the correct configuration file to enable routing... I have two PCs, one HAS a internet connection to the internet-proxy, the other one hasn't. The internet-pc (and I do not mean the proxy-pc) has two ethernet devices, ra0 and eth0. eth0 connects it with the non-internet pc. I set up a route to the internet-proxy-px on the internet-pc and it works fine on it, but the the non-internet pc can't use it! Even though the non-internet pc has it's default gw set to the eth0 ip of the internet pc. Thanks for your help. pgpnur5LkkA55.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
Roman Naumann wrote: Hi, please forgive this most probably very simple question, but I cannot find the correct configuration file to enable routing... I have two PCs, one HAS a internet connection to the internet-proxy, the other one hasn't. The internet-pc (and I do not mean the proxy-pc) has two ethernet devices, ra0 and eth0. eth0 connects it with the non-internet pc. I set up a route to the internet-proxy-px on the internet-pc and it works fine on it, but the the non-internet pc can't use it! Even though the non-internet pc has it's default gw set to the eth0 ip of the internet pc. Thanks for your help. Roman, I'm not quite clear on your configuration. What sort of device is the internet-proxy? Is it a NAT router, or something else? Are all three devices in the same subnet? It sounds like you're either trying to work around not having a hub, or not having a NAT device. JT -- Web:http://www.signless.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (503) 616-4816 Cell: (503) 419-8806 Skype: jt.justman -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
You need something like NAT to be configured on your internet-pc. This maybe help(especially the NAT part): http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/home-router-howto.xml Best wishes, ;-) On 21:22 Sat 17 Feb , Roman Naumann wrote: Hi, please forgive this most probably very simple question, but I cannot find the correct configuration file to enable routing... I have two PCs, one HAS a internet connection to the internet-proxy, the other one hasn't. The internet-pc (and I do not mean the proxy-pc) has two ethernet devices, ra0 and eth0. eth0 connects it with the non-internet pc. I set up a route to the internet-proxy-px on the internet-pc and it works fine on it, but the the non-internet pc can't use it! Even though the non-internet pc has it's default gw set to the eth0 ip of the internet pc. Thanks for your help. pgpurr3L2cPld.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
Roman, I'm not quite clear on your configuration. What sort of device is the internet-proxy? Is it a NAT router, or something else? Are all three devices in the same subnet? It sounds like you're either trying to work around not having a hub, or not having a NAT device. Thanks for your answer. Here the whole configuration: (imagine it as a complicated line of different connections through the entire house...) PC1 (the proxy-running-pc) is running windows and a proxy software for the internals of my skydsl connection. [PC1 and Router1 are connected via wired-lan] Router1 is acting as a wlan-lan bridge (but without any direct internet functions..). [Router1 and PC2 are connected via wireless-lan] PC2 (the internet-pc) is running gentoo and has a wireless and a wired-lan connection. [PC2 and PC3 are connected via wired-lan] PC3 (the non-internet-pc) is running genoo and only has a wired-lan connection. All I need is (ping like) access to PC1 to use the internet connection. (Usually adding the http_proxy environment variable or something to PC1's IP-address.) PC2 has Router1 set as the default gateway and can ping PC1 hence. PC3 has set PC2 as the default gateway, but cannot ping anything else than PC2. (...which is directly connected anyway...) I think NAT isn't what I'm looking for, I just need ping access to _one_ specific ip, so, some static routes should do the job. I hope that clarifies my situation. Thanks for your help so far. pgpsHaSFKYUCS.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] glas-check: Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!
Hi all, sudo emerge --sync sudo glsa-check -f $(glsa-check -t all) I get the following error for openldap-2.3.27: !!! ERROR: net-nds/openldap-2.3.27-r3 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1614: Called dyn_unpack ebuild.sh, line 751: Called qa_call 'src_unpack' environment, line 4079: Called src_unpack openldap-2.3.27-r3.ebuild, line 205: Called epatch '/usr/portage/net-nds/openldap/files/openldap-2.3.27-CVE-2006-5779.patch' eutils.eclass, line 198: Called die !!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Any ideas? Further details below. Thanks and regards Garry [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ cat gentoo-release Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/conf.d $ emerge --version Portage 2.1.2-r9 (default-linux/x86/2006.1, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r4, 2.6.17.13 i686) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ uname -a Linux obufki 2.6.17.13 #5 SMP PREEMPT Sun Dec 17 21:22:10 GMT 2006 i686 Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2500 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux sudo glsa-check -f $(glsa-check -t all) Emerging (1 of 1) net-nds/openldap-2.3.27-r3 to / Downloading 'http://gentoo.blueyonder.co.uk/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz' --10:47:30-- http://gentoo.blueyonder.co.uk/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz = `/usr/portage/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz' Resolving gentoo.blueyonder.co.uk... 194.117.143.70, 194.117.143.71, 194.117.143.72, ... Connecting to gentoo.blueyonder.co.uk|194.117.143.70|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: http://gentoo.virginmedia.com/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz [following] --10:47:30-- http://gentoo.virginmedia.com/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz = `/usr/portage/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz' Resolving gentoo.virginmedia.com... 194.117.143.71, 194.117.143.72, 194.117.143.69, ... Connecting to gentoo.virginmedia.com|194.117.143.71|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 3,757,519 (3.6M) [application/x-tar] 100%[] 3,757,519348.72K/sETA 00:00 10:47:41 (335.21 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/openldap-2.3.27.tgz' saved [3757519/3757519] * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking openldap-2.3.27.tgz ;-) ... [ ok ] * * Scanning datadir(s) from slapd.conf and * the default installdir for Versiontags * (/var/lib/openldap-data may appear twice) * * - Checking /var/lib/openldap-data... *Found Versiontag in /var/lib/openldap-data *Versiontag is fine here :) * * - Checking /var/lib/openldap-data... *Found Versiontag in /var/lib/openldap-data *Versiontag is fine here :) * * * All datadirs are fine, proceeding with merge now... * Unpacking source... Unpacking openldap-2.3.27.tgz to /var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.3.27-r3/work * Applying openldap-2.2.14-perlthreadsfix.patch ... [ ok ] * Applying openldap-2.2.6-ntlm.patch ... [ ok ] * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is: * * /usr/portage/net-nds/openldap/files/openldap-2.3.27-CVE-2006-5779.patch * ( openldap-2.3.27-CVE-2006-5779.patch ) !!! ERROR: net-nds/openldap-2.3.27-r3 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1614: Called dyn_unpack ebuild.sh, line 751: Called qa_call 'src_unpack' environment, line 4079: Called src_unpack openldap-2.3.27-r3.ebuild, line 205: Called epatch '/usr/portage/net-nds/openldap/files/openldap-2.3.27-CVE-2006-5779.patch' eutils.eclass, line 198: Called die !!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. !!! A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.3.27-r3/temp/build.log'. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/portage/net-nds/openldap/files $ ls DB_CONFIG.fast.example digest-openldap-2.3.30-r2 openldap-2.3.21-ppolicy.patch slurpd-initd digest-openldap-2.1.30-r10 digest-openldap-2.3.33 openldap-2.3.24-contrib-smbk5pwd.patch digest-openldap-2.2.28-r7 openldap-2.2.14-perlthreadsfix.patch slapd-confd digest-openldap-2.3.27-r3 openldap-2.2.6-ntlm.patch slapd-initd -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Roman Naumann wrote:
Here the whole configuration: (imagine it as a complicated line of different
connections through the entire house...)
[SNIP]
Hm, I think in theory you should have the PC in the middle with 2 IP
addresses, on each interface different. On each segment (each side of
the middle one) should be IPs from different range and there should be
allowed routing (that I do not know how). It would look like this:
--( PC1 IP-A/Range1 ) -- ( IP-B/Range1 PC2 IP-C/Range2 ) -- (
IP-D/Range2 PC3 )
PC2 can comm with all (since it is on both nets). PC3 shloud use IP-C as
its gateway, which will allow it to access PC1. PC1 should have static
route for whole Range2 to IP-B, so it can send to PC3. Now, how is that
set in Windows, who knows..
After this all is set, PC1 and PC3 should be able to talk to each other.
However, you will not see the pings unless both directions work.
So, you need to:
• PC3: /etc/conf.d/net:routes_eth0 = { default via IP-C }
• PC2: enable routing (I guess /etc/conf.d/net too)
• PC1: add a static route Range2 - IP-B.
I just hope I did not mess that up.
Or you can set up a bridge on PC2 to make both segments one net only:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_setup_a_gentoo_bridge
Have a nice day
--
BOFH Excuse #452:
Somebody ran the operating system through a spelling checker.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
pgpsG8TMWnIAY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing: how to enable..
Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: Hello, On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Roman Naumann wrote: Here the whole configuration: (imagine it as a complicated line of different connections through the entire house...) [SNIP] Hm, I think in theory you should have the PC in the middle with 2 IP addresses, on each interface different. On each segment (each side of the middle one) should be IPs from different range and there should be allowed routing (that I do not know how). It would look like this: --( PC1 IP-A/Range1 ) -- ( IP-B/Range1 PC2 IP-C/Range2 ) -- ( IP-D/Range2 PC3 ) PC2 can comm with all (since it is on both nets). PC3 shloud use IP-C as its gateway, which will allow it to access PC1. PC1 should have static route for whole Range2 to IP-B, so it can send to PC3. Now, how is that set in Windows, who knows.. After this all is set, PC1 and PC3 should be able to talk to each other. However, you will not see the pings unless both directions work. ...snip... Yeah, this sounds pretty good to me. The subnet assignments are key, as is confirming connectivity at each point. Bridging on PC2 is a good choice too. Not sure if your WiFi router is really in bridge mode or not. Be sure its 'WAN' side is in Range1 and its 'LAN' side is in Range2. JT -- Web:http://www.signless.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (503) 616-4816 Cell: (503) 419-8806 Skype: jt.justman -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem emerging ATI drivers
On Saturday 17 February 2007 10:14, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2007-02-17, David Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting the following output while emerging x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.32.5. make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.19' 8.32.5 won't compile as-is with recent kernels. There is a patch available to get it to compile, or you can use a newer ATI-drivers package. But newer ATI-drivers packages don't support some older boards (92xx). A patch for 8.32.5 has been submitted on bugs.gentoo.rog, but the response was screw you, go buy a newer video card. How old are those cards? A truly lousy answer if someone has such a chip in a laptop. So, I created an overlay and modified the ebuild to get it to work. If you want a copy, it's available at: The contents of that file are for 8.28.8. Either this is a problem, or I'm not doing the overlay thing correctly (which I *think* I am.). ftp://ftp.visi.com/users/grante/ati-drivers-8.32.5-r1-overlay.tar.gz -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I brought my BOWLING at BALL -- and some DRUGS!! visi.com -- David Corbin Games, Gamers, Gaming - a blog - http://g3.machturtle.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Firefox problems...
Anyone having problems saving images or links in firefox 2.0? I'm running the latest firefox binary and mozilla launcher... and when I right click to save an image, the browser dies. Running strace on it doesn't yield much info. It says something like unlink(/root/.mozilla/firefox/nan3prqz.default/lock) and then segfaults... Anyone else? At this moment I'm compiling firefox from sources to see if it's any better. -- Jerry McBride -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox problems...
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 21:09 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: Anyone having problems saving images or links in firefox 2.0? I'm running the latest firefox binary and mozilla launcher... and when I right click to save an image, the browser dies. Running strace on it doesn't yield much info. It says something like unlink(/root/.mozilla/firefox/nan3prqz.default/lock) and then segfaults... Anyone else? Occaisionally, Firefox 2.0 crashes out when choosing to save a link, as well as when using the mouse wheel and (as I JUST found out) when clicking on a menu item like Help. At this moment I'm compiling firefox from sources to see if it's any better. My Firefox is from sources and I have these problems. The Restore Session option is very nice, however. -- Jerry McBride -- Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
Hi - I've just installed a wireless card and think I need to install ralink-rt61 drivers (that's what lspci shows). I'm a dual boot system (XP/Gentoo) and wireless works fine in XP at the moment. I thought I would download the package with XP (FTP / HTTP?)and then copy it into /usr/portage/distfiles. Thanks, Richard
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
Richard Watson wrote: Hi - I've just installed a wireless card and think I need to install ralink-rt61 drivers (that's what lspci shows). I'm a dual boot system (XP/Gentoo) and wireless works fine in XP at the moment. I thought I would download the package with XP (FTP / HTTP?)and then copy it into /usr/portage/distfiles. Thanks, Richard That will work just fine. Just copy it there and then emerge will see it and do its thing. Dale :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/dalek1967
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
That will work just fine. Just copy it there and then emerge will see it and do its thing. What http or ftp address goes to the package area where I can download? Thanks, Richard
[gentoo-user] Cryptic warning message x11-drivers:ati-drivers-8.32.5 build
I ran an emerge --sync, and updated --world a few minutes ago. For the x11-drivers:ati-drivers-8.32.5 build, I found the following warning message... WARN: setup You have DRM support enabled builtin, the direct rendering will not work. As near as I can tell, this is something like ALSA, where you're not supposed to enable it in the kernel, but rather in the module. What exactly am I supposed to do to get DRM to work? -- Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] In linux /sbin/init is Job #1 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
What http or ftp address goes to the package area where I can download? Thanks, Richard Stupid question ... One of the mirrors of course (sorry). Richard
[gentoo-user] Re: Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
Richard Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What http or ftp address goes to the package area where I can download? Thanks, Richard See http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/mirrors.xml#doc_chap1_sect5 for mirrors near you. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to download packages from Windows XP?
Richard Watson wrote: That will work just fine. Just copy it there and then emerge will see it and do its thing. What http or ftp address goes to the package area where I can download? Thanks, Richard One way to get a known mirror is to do this command: emerge -fp package name It will give you a list of mirrors that should have the file and the address for it too. If you want to, you can also go to gentoo.org and click the link on the left under Resources for Mirrors. Some of the mirrors are fairly easy to figure out which is closest to you. Pick a close one if you can. When you click on the mirror you have picked, click distfiles. A list should come up of all the files that are available. Pick the one you need and click on it. That should start the download. If it tries to open it instead of downloading it as a file, try right clicking and select save target as. If you don't see the exact one you need, go back and pick another mirror. It may not have gotten the file if it was recently added. After that, copy it to the distfiles directory and try to emerge your package. Hope that helps. Dale :-) ;-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/dalek1967
[gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins
Hi everyone, # emerge -avDu world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating world dependencies | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald !!! Depgraph creation failed. Maybe snippets from my /etc/portage/package.* files will be helpful: keywords x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/beryl-core x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-misc/beryl-settings unmask x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/beryl-core x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/beryl-vidcap x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-misc/beryl-settings I'm not very familiar with unmasking system, so most probably an answer to the question I'm asking is more than just obvious - if so, accept my apologies. Nevertheless, I would be grateful for your support. Best regards, Jan Stępień -- Mailjan at stepien com pl Jabber jano at jabber aster pl GG 1894343 Web http://stepien.com.pl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
