Re: [gentoo-user] eclean ... won't

2016-11-21 Thread Dale
J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 05:07:03 PM Константин wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > Maybe you need to use

Re: [gentoo-user] eclean ... won't

2016-11-21 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Sunday, November 20, 2016 05:07:03 PM Константин wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > > > > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But,

[gentoo-user] Battery plugin on fbpanel

2016-11-21 Thread William Ernesto Cárdenas Gómez
Hello I am testing fbpanel and generally I like it, but the battery plugin does not work. The plugin only says "Running on AC No battery found" I have been searching on the web but no solution to this problem. ¿Did anybody knows where to get or have info about this?

Re: [gentoo-user] bugs in ebuilds?

2016-11-21 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:26:14 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > > As a short term solution, you can run the application with nohup. > interesting. I was not familar with nohup. I could also redirect stderr to /dev/null,

Re: [gentoo-user] bugs in ebuilds?

2016-11-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:26:14 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote: > My current concrete example: gtk+ 3.* has a configuration option > --enable-debug=[no/minimum/yes] (default=debug_default) > > There is no USE variable to control this. From what I [think I] > understood, the default is set in the source

Re: [gentoo-user] bugs in ebuilds?

2016-11-21 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/21/2016 08:26 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> What is the proper procedure to ask for some modification in a ebuild? >> (Bugs as well as feature requests...) >> > > File a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/ > Thanks. Done.

Re: [gentoo-user] bugs in ebuilds?

2016-11-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/21/2016 08:26 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > What is the proper procedure to ask for some modification in a ebuild? > (Bugs as well as feature requests...) > File a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/ > My current concrete example: gtk+ 3.* has a configuration option >

[gentoo-user] bugs in ebuilds?

2016-11-21 Thread Jorge Almeida
What is the proper procedure to ask for some modification in a ebuild? (Bugs as well as feature requests...) My current concrete example: gtk+ 3.* has a configuration option --enable-debug=[no/minimum/yes] (default=debug_default) There is no USE variable to control this. From what I [think I]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

2016-11-21 Thread John Covici
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:57:02 -0500, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > [1 ] > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:47:13 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > On my i7 machine with 16g of ram, webkit-gtk has got to take 4/5 hours > > > to compile. This is using an ssd. > > > > That vindicates my choice of an NVMe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

2016-11-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:47:13 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On my i7 machine with 16g of ram, webkit-gtk has got to take 4/5 hours > > to compile. This is using an ssd. > > That vindicates my choice of an NVMe SSD for this box, which is also an > i7 but with 32GB. Genlop shows it takes

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

2016-11-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 09:48:07 John Covici wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:25:58 -0500, > > Harry Putnam wrote: > > Rich Freeman writes: > > > IMO over-committing CPU isn't actually THAT bad. The CPU obviously > > > gets divided n ways, but that's as far as it goes. There