Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

2018-02-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
hehehehe :-) every now and again I unleash my inner grumpy old fart and should him to the world at large! On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:05:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Perhaps you should lay out clearly why you think

Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

2018-02-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:05:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Perhaps you should lay out clearly why you think you need to do this, > so everyone else can help match your expectations to reality :-) Watch out everyone, Alan's in one of those moods! ;-) -- Neil Bothwick C: (n.) the language

Re: [gentoo-user] detox'ing files by keeping their time stamp?

2018-02-19 Thread Stroller
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 17:47, Floyd Anderson wrote: >> >> $ cat t.sh >> #!/bin/bash >> TMPF=$(mktemp "/tmp/detox_wrapper.$$.") >> for f in "$@"; do >> touch -r "$f" "$TMPF" >> detox "$f" >> touch -r "$TMPF" "$f" >> done >> rm -f "$TMPF" > > If I’m not totally wrong,

Re: [gentoo-user] Boot Gentoo live iso from grub

2018-02-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:10:03 +0200, zless wrote: > On top of that my nvme disk is not seen in the busybox recovery shell > in order to try to manually mount the encrypted container. > I think the nvme things are modules inside the initrd and > that doesn't get loaded. If you're in busybox the

Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

2018-02-19 Thread Branko Grubic
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:55:08 + (UTC) Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > Hey, > > I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to > figure out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not > *dependencies*, dependants: packages that require

Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

2018-02-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/02/2018 14:55, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: Hey, I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencies*, dependants: packages that require said package. As a recent example: whenever go (the language)

[gentoo-user] Rebuilding all dependants of a package

2018-02-19 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
Hey, I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencies*, dependants: packages that require said package. As a recent example: whenever go (the language) is updated to a new version (say from 1.9 to

Re: [gentoo-user] detox'ing files by keeping their time stamp?

2018-02-19 Thread Stroller
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 11:38, Stroller wrote: >> >> With the tool 'detox' those filenames could be fixed. >> >> But detox changes the time stamp of the files, which >> filenames are altered (not all files, which are examined). >> >> Is there a way to either get

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion

2018-02-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:14:18 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > I no longer use Gnucash, having switched to KMyMoney a few years ago. Now > that's just jumped a major version and I had to mask it because of > missing features... so much for progress. This conversation reminds me that I used to

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion

2018-02-19 Thread thelma
On 02/18/2018 05:50 PM, John Blinka wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:40 AM allan gottlieb wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 18 2018, Mick wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:09:36 GMT allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> Specifically excluding the buggy (old) version of

Re: [gentoo-user] detox'ing files by keeping their time stamp?

2018-02-19 Thread karl
Stroller: > > On 18 Feb 2018, at 17:47, Floyd Anderson wrote: > >> > >> $ cat t.sh > >> #!/bin/bash > >> TMPF=$(mktemp "/tmp/detox_wrapper.$$.") > >> for f in "$@"; do > >> touch -r "$f" "$TMPF" > >> detox "$f" > >> touch -r "$TMPF" "$f" > >> done > >> rm -f "$TMPF"

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion

2018-02-19 Thread allan gottlieb
On Mon, Feb 19 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:37 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> It is a good point. Why Gentoo developers marked or allow to mark >> gnucash-2.7 branch stable in portage when the developers >> https://www.gnucash.org/download.phtml did not mark

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion

2018-02-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:37 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > It is a good point. Why Gentoo developers marked or allow to mark > gnucash-2.7 branch stable in portage when the developers > https://www.gnucash.org/download.phtml did not mark it STABLE The key phrase there is "stable in