Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:47:32 BST Floyd Anderson wrote: > Just a guess, because you’re compiling multilib – look whether your > kernel is able to run 32bit binaries. Check, e.g. the setting for kernel > option CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION. That's it! I just reused the .config from the previous

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:25:10 BST the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > SOLVED! > The gcc-6.4.0-r1 compiled with > MAKEOPTS="-j1" > > What is strange is that this is the second low profile system that > gcc-6.4.0-r1 failed to compile large package. My other boxed was 4-core > and 4GB of RAM and I

[gentoo-user] cant find stdlib.h

I have a compile problem qtgui I cant figure out: compilation terminated. make: *** [Makefile:12443: .obj/qaccessible.o] Error 1 make: *** [Makefile:12612: .obj/qaccessiblecache.o] Error 1 In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.4.0/include/g++-v6/bits/stl_algo.h:59:0,    

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/28/2018 10:40 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 March 2018 16:14:49 BST the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> On 03/28/2018 01:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > [...] >>> I have a similar system, but Atom N270. I wouldn't want to compile much on >>> it, and certainly not GCC. I NFS-export

[gentoo-user] sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs causing sandbox violation in /root/.ccache?

Th ​is has been going on for the last few months. It only seems to happen for sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs. I haven't filed a bug yet as I'm unsure if there is something I'm overlooking on my end. I can delete /root/.ccache and remerge and it seems to be fine after that, but while updating the world

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 2018-03-28 17:40, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I think NFS may be simpler to operate, but that may be because I'm > more familiar with it. You just need something like this in the Atom's > /etc/ exports: /usr/portage > 192.168.1.5(rw,no_subtree_check,anonuid=250,anongid=250,no_wdelay) NBD (Network

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/28/2018 03:53 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: Well, that's too many 3-letter acronyms for me It is lower level, yes. All the filesystem code is on the client; the server only handles requests of the form "here's the new contents of block 1234, and be sure to tell me when it's safely on disk".

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 2018-03-28 16:09, Grant Taylor wrote: > The point being, NBD / AoE / iSCSI are SAN technologies and not > conducive for multiple clients to access at the same time (without a > clustered file system). Unlike NFS which is safe for multiple clients > to access at the same time. So, having

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 2018-03-28 15:08, Grant Taylor wrote: > Doesn't NBD (iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet) show up more like SAN > compared to NFS which is NAS? Well, that's too many 3-letter acronyms for me ;-) It is lower level, yes. All the filesystem code is on the client; the server only handles requests of

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/28/2018 12:08 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 03/28/2018 10:40 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Wednesday, 28 March 2018 16:14:49 BST the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> On 03/28/2018 01:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> [...] I have a similar system, but Atom N270. I wouldn't want

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/28/2018 02:51 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: NBD (Network Block Device) may be an alternative to NFS in some situations. Doesn't NBD (iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet) show up more like SAN compared to NFS which is NAS? -- Grant. . . . unix || die

Re: [gentoo-user] Error with infinality font while emerging sane-backends

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:58:21 +0800 Danny YUE wrote: Thanks for your quick reply :-) I created the symbolic link as you told, That solves the: Fontconfig error: failed reading config file Fontconfig error: Cannot load config file "infinality/conf.d"

Re: [gentoo-user] cant find stdlib.h

I had ran into this before (but on Gentoo FreeBSD); maybe the compile command line had stray -isystem in it, thus disturbing the include search path. Pengcheng Xu i...@jsteward.moe > H30/03/28 20:18、Bill Kenworthy のメール: > > I have a compile problem qtgui I cant figure

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On Wednesday, 28 March 2018 16:14:49 BST the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 03/28/2018 01:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: [...] > > I have a similar system, but Atom N270. I wouldn't want to compile much on > > it, and certainly not GCC. I NFS-export its $PORTDIR to this much more > > powerful box,

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Wednesday, 28 March 2018 17:15:38 BST Todd Goodman wrote: > What does 'gcc-config -l' show? That I have just the one version of GCC installed. But see my reply to Floyd. -- Regards Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

What does 'gcc-config -l' show? Todf ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Mar 27, 2018, 5:02 AM, at 5:02 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 01:24:09 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > >> I ran into this some time ago and one of the updates removed the /lib >-> >> /lib64

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/28/2018 01:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:25:10 BST the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> SOLVED! >> The gcc-6.4.0-r1 compiled with >> MAKEOPTS="-j1" >> >> What is strange is that this is the second low profile system that >> gcc-6.4.0-r1 failed to compile large

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:38:10 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:47:32 BST Floyd Anderson wrote: Just a guess, because you’re compiling multilib – look whether your kernel is able to run 32bit binaries. Check, e.g. the setting for kernel option