Martin,
On Thursday, 2020-04-30 17:20:08 -, you wrote:
> ...
> >>=app-crypt/tpm2-tss-2.2.3-r1 ~amd64
>
> Ah! That explains it.
>
> > But this only means that I accept an unstable package here, not that
> > these versions are regarded stable.
>
> It is stabe according to the local
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:12:08PM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> I am afraid this is an ".. it depends" question.
>
Yes, I agree.
> If you work with large images or data sets, swap can be really handy.
> If you are doing a little programming, web browsing, reading email you
> will
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:56 AM Caveman Al Toraboran <
toraboracave...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists
wrote:
>
> > For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
> > example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I
Dale wrote:
> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dale,
>>
>> I am now running kernel 5.6.9 (vanilla) and nvidia-driver 440.82-r3.
>>
>> Again, Blender cannot find the Optix related parts of the driver.
>> This package still does not work for me. As far as I can see,
>> the non-Optix specific things
Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> I STRONGLY beg to disagree! The "~amd64" notation is used to ACCEPT a
> package even though it is (still) classified as UNSTABLE.
This is package-manager terminology which has much less states since
a package manager needs no fine distinctions about the reasons of
Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
>> example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
>> maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering an array on
On 03/05/2020 18:55, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 5:32 PM antlists wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2020 21:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I don't think you should focus so much on whether read=write in your
> > RAID. I'd focus more on whether read and write both meet your
> > requirements.
>
> If you think about it, it's obvious that
On 03/05/2020 22:46, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
curious. how do people look at --layout=n2 in the
storage industry? e.g. do they ignore the
optimistic case where 2 disk failures can be
recovered, and only assume that it protects for 1
disk
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:44 AM Caveman Al Toraboran
wrote:
>
> * RAID 1: fails to satisfy points (1) and (3)...
> this leaves me with RAID 10
Two things:
1. RAID 10 doesn't satisfy point 1 (read and write performance are
identical). No RAID implementation I'm aware of does.
2. Some
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> I've used the WD Reds and WD Golds (no not sold) and never had any problem.
>
Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
just caught shipping unadvertised SMR in WD Red disks. This is going
to at the very least impact
Hi gentoo-user,
I'm attempting to configure a mid-range video card: the Radeon R7 370. Running
on the Pitcairn chipset and a member of the Southern Islands family, I am
surprised at the complexity of setting up the Radeon driver in comparison to its
NVIDIA counterpart.
I followed [1]
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:16 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> > I've used the WD Reds and WD Golds (no not sold) and never had any
problem.
> >
>
> Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
> just caught shipping
Am 03.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
so, in summary:
/\
| a 5-disk RAID10 is better than a 6-disk RAID10 |
| ONLY IF your data is WORTH LESS than 3,524.3 |
| bucks. |
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 6:52 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:16 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
> > just caught shipping unadvertised SMR in WD Red disks. This is going
> > to at the very least impact your
On 03/05/2020 21:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
I don't think you should focus so much on whether read=write in your
RAID. I'd focus more on whether read and write both meet your
requirements.
If you think about it, it's obvious that raid-1 will read faster than it
writes - it has to write two
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
> example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
> maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering an array on the raid
> list involve them
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:04:27PM -0400, james wrote:
> Gentoo
> install-amd64-minimal-20200119T214502Z.iso
> livedvd-amd64-hardened-nomultilib-20170118.iso
>
> Let me know/post if there is a place actually download these iso files?
It seems like a LiveDVD image hasn't been built in
On 5/3/20 8:47 PM, Dale wrote:
james wrote:
I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
Has anyone tested it?
https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
I just read about it on ycombinator
curiously,
James
I went here:
https://www.ventoy.net/en/isolist.html
If you
james wrote:
> On 5/3/20 8:47 PM, Dale wrote:
>> james wrote:
>>> I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
>>>
>>> Has anyone tested it?
>>>
>>> https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
>>>
>>> I just read about it on ycombinator
>>>
>>>
>>> curiously,
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
> Minor point - you have one duplicate line there ". f f ." which is the
> second and last line of the second group. No effect on anything else in
> the discussion.
thanks.
> Trying to help thinking about odd numbers of disks, if you are still
>
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 6:50 PM hitachi303
wrote:
>
> The only person I know who is running a really huge raid ( I guess 2000+
> drives) is comfortable with some spare drives. His raid did fail an can
> fail. Data will be lost. Everything important has to be stored at a
> secondary location. But
james wrote:
> I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
>
> Has anyone tested it?
>
> https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
>
> I just read about it on ycombinator
>
>
> curiously,
> James
>
>
I went here:
https://www.ventoy.net/en/isolist.html
If you scroll down the
On Monday, May 4, 2020 2:50 AM, hitachi303
wrote:
> Am 03.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
>
> > so, in summary:
> > /\
> > | a 5-disk RAID10 is better than a 6-disk RAID10 |
> > | ONLY IF your data is WORTH LESS than 3,524.3 |
> > |
I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
Has anyone tested it?
https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
I just read about it on ycombinator
curiously,
James
On Monday, May 4, 2020 3:19 AM, antlists wrote:
> On 03/05/2020 22:46, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > curious. how do people look at --layout=n2 in the
> > storage industry? e.g. do they ignore the
> > optimistic
Am 03.05.2020 um 07:44 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
* RAIDs 4 to 6: fails to satisfy point (3)
since they are stuck with a fixed tolerance
towards failing disks (i.e. RAIDs 4 and 5
tolerate only 1 disk failure, and RAID 6
tolerates only 2).
As far as I remember
On 03/05/20 08:53, hitachi303 wrote:
> Nothing you asked but I had very bad experience with drives which spin
> down by themselves to save energy (mostly titled green or so).
Good catch!
For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
example, Seagate Barracudas are very
hi - i'm to setup my 1st RAID, and i'd appreciate
if any of you volunteers some time to share your
valuable experience on this subject.
my scenario
---
0. i don't boot from the RAID.
1. read is as important as write. i don't
have any application-specific scenario that
On 03/05/20 06:44, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> hi - i'm to setup my 1st RAID, and i'd appreciate
> if any of you volunteers some time to share your
> valuable experience on this subject.
>
> my scenario
> ---
>
> 0. i don't boot from the RAID.
>
> 1. read is as important as
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:14 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Q3: what are the future growth/shrinkage
> > options for a RAID10 setup? e.g. with
> > respect to these:
> >
> > 1. read/write speed.
> >
>
> iirc far is good for speed.
>
> > 2. tolerance guarantee towards failing
> >disks.
>
On 5/3/20 1:44 AM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
[snip]...
so, we get the following combinations of
disk failures that, if happen, we won't
lose any data:
RAID0
--^--
RAID1 RAID1
--^-- --^--
F . . . < cases with
32 matches
Mail list logo
