Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Looks like it is related to -march=native.
>
> See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373
>
Nailed it. After the post by Michael, I edited the kernel several
times. I'm sure I ruled that thing out. I had some crc stuff not there
but same error with or without. I admit,
On Thursday, 23 November 2023 11:06:25 GMT Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale :
> >Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> >> Looks like it is related to -march=native.
> >>
> >> See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373
> >
> >I'm not sure how you figured that out either.
>
Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale :
>Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> Looks like it is related to -march=native.
>>
>> See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373
>>
>
>I'm not sure how you figured that out either.
I pasted the error message into the search engine of my choice. I think there
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 04:07, Jack wrote:
>
> May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild?
Also, you can try just one-shotting the reported packages, such as
(for the last one in your list):
emerge -1 sys-libs/zlib
Regards,
Arve
First time I've seen this happen!
Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
following preserved libs:
---
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
* - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
First time I've seen this happen!
Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
following preserved libs:
---
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
* -
May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild?
On 11/23/23 16:51, Matt Connell wrote:
First time I've seen this happen!
Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
following preserved libs:
---
!!! existing preserved libs:
package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
*
Sorry for the double post; I got a mail-undeliverable from Google so I
thought it didn't go through and retried it. Turns out it got to the
mailing list (both times) but not to gmail recipients because Google
doesn't like my SPF record (record says hard-fail on no match and
someone somewhere is
Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 November 2023 11:06:25 GMT Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> Am 23. November 2023 08:08:47 UTC schrieb Dale :
>>> Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Looks like it is related to -march=native.
See bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/838373
>>> I'm not sure how you figured that
9 matches
Mail list logo
