Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Freitag, 8. September 2006 05:07 schrieb ext Grant:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
It's not a question of improvement, but of consistency, especially for C++
sw like KDE. The GCC upgrade guide doesn't tell you to do so just for the
sake
2006/9/8, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
If you want
Nico wrote:
For those who have gnucash installed, is it the 2.0 version (~86) ? Does
it work fine ?
I have to choose in urgence a software like this and I'm testing grisbi
for now, which is a bit too basic for the interface. I need graphs and
beatiful colours :)
Sql-ledger is a nice one,
On 9/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be a real problem for install, as it would result in the
source tree being removed and recreated...obviuosly in an unconfigured
and uncompiled state.
This is odd, and I'm still looking
Boris Fersing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
If you want to prevent compilation issues, applications
On 9/7/06, Boris Fersing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt works too. Adding a package without keyword
will imply unstable host arch (cf manpage) :
Ah, ok thanks. I hadn't noticed that...probably because I generally
dislike implied behavior. Apologies to A.R.
-Richard
--
On 9/7/06, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
Why do you advise people to ignore the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I'm upgrading my gcc from 3.x to 4.x. I've done the gcc switching, and
now I'm
updating my system.
The recommended steps are:
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
While emerging my system I received a message suggesting I run
revdep-rebuild:
On 9/7/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
I don't seen how these packages can be marked stable.
I switched to baselayout-1.12.4-r7 and it works fine. I did have to
edit some config files because of some changes in the way the networks
are started and such. It was /etc/conf.d/net
On 9/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm upgrading my gcc from 3.x to 4.x. I've done the gcc switching, and now I'm
updating my system.
The recommended steps are:
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
While emerging my system I received a message suggesting I run
On Thursday 07 September 2006 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm upgrading my gcc from 3.x to 4.x. I've done the gcc
switching, and now I'm updating my system.
The recommended steps are:
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
While emerging my system I received a message
Hi all,
Anyone here had any luck getting Sybase's products installed and
running on gentoo AND nicely integrated into everything else?
I need to get at least the free Express edition ASE15 and IQ
12.6 going with ASE support enabled in php5. The sybase-ct
USE flag in php5 causes the compile to
On 9/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard for the inside dope - he's the resident gcc expert
around here :-)
:-P
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello!
We have a printer stated in $subject, and looking for a cups driver for it.
Does anyone know which driver can we use for it?
Thanks,
Istvan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Many thanks,
regards,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 8 Sep, Stefán István wrote:
Hello!
We have a printer stated in $subject, and looking for a cups driver for it.
Does anyone know which driver can we use for it?
Just try
http://www.ricoh-support.com/enduser/home/default.asp?langID=1
Select multifunctional products and Aficio FX16
This
péntek 08 szeptember 2006 12.31 dátummal Helmut Jarausch ezt írta:
On 8 Sep, Stefán István wrote:
Hello!
We have a printer stated in $subject, and looking for a cups driver for
it.
Does anyone know which driver can we use for it?
Just try
csütörtök 07 szeptember 2006 08.25 dátummal Richard Fish ezt írta:
On 9/6/06, Stefán István [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be good, cause I don't nedd mono at all, so if it is not
required
for hugin, then I won't struggle to install it.
Who can correct this bug?
bugs.gentoo.org
On Friday 08 September 2006 11:06 pm, Stefán István wrote:
Thanks for the help, I downloaded the exe file, but it is not a zip
archive, I can't uncompress it.
I tried to execute it via wine, then it starts to uncompress itself, but I
don't find any .ppd file in the directory where it
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're
an
actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be
fancy,
you
can put community or something if that's all you want. All
responses
off
list please. Thanks.
[Timothy A. Holmes]
[user]
I reply
How much hardware leeway is safe to accept when using a source 4 tarball
for an installation?
For example, I have 2 basic models of server one is a gateway pancake
server - p4 3.0 ghz HT, about 512m of memory and 500Gb sata drives
The other is roughly similar but in a standard case the processor
And if you want to prevent compilation issues, applications crash,
you'd better not follow the Gentoo GCC Upgrade Guide [1]
and do not upgrade gcc at all... :-(
Sorry for this sarcasm, but I am fighting with gcc-upgrade
for more than week. If I knew there would be so many issues,
I'd have
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
[Timothy A. Holmes]
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far
péntek 08 szeptember 2006 13.34 dátummal Thomas Kear ezt írta:
On Friday 08 September 2006 11:06 pm, Stefán István wrote:
Thanks for the help, I downloaded the exe file, but it is not a zip
archive, I can't uncompress it.
I tried to execute it via wine, then it starts to uncompress itself,
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
snip
I would run revdep-rebuild after the rebuild of
world, just to be sure.
snip
Cheers
Marc
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc
I would call this discussion Re-installing the system with gcc-4.1
That's what I'm doing now after more than one week of struggle ! ;-)
On 9/8/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy A. Holmes wrote: [Timothy A. Holmes] I am leaving my office in a moment to put the
2006.1 disk in a server to
On 9/6/06, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best install CD to use to get this k6-200MHz machine installed? It will not be running X so maybe an older minimal CD is more friendly to oldamd K6? maybe the x86 2006.1 liveCD is not the best choice?
Suggestions are most welcome.JamesI have
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:40 -0400, Statux wrote:
[snip]
All responses off list please. Thanks.
[snip]
Just pointing that one out as 2 people have missed it already :)
what about everyone else who might be interested in the answer?
On 9/8/06, Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc, so I can make an ISO from the disc (I think it's a minimal install cd) and get it to you somehow.
I didn't look hard enough:
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How much hardware leeway is safe to accept when using a source 4 tarball
for an installation?
For example, I have 2 basic models of server one is a gateway pancake
server - p4 3.0 ghz HT, about 512m of memory and 500Gb sata drives
The other
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far and it took me 5 days and nearly cost me
my laptop --
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far and it
For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
After unmerging the package,
/etc/env.d/05compiler
file was not deleted. As a result, enviroment variables were invalid.
After deleting the file (and 'env-update' and 'source /etc/profile')
switching to 4.1.1 was seamless
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
eselect-compiler is now hard-masked, so that shouldn't be a problem any
more.
To add some balance, I've upgraded four machines, on three different
architectures, to
[user]
Portage
Streamlined installation -- U nstall what U want, exactly what U want
...
Did I mention Portage :).
ShawnOn 9/8/06, Mikko Ruuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:40 -0400, Statux wrote: [snip]All responses off list
-Original Message-
From: Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:25 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a
server to
start a
It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
this portage error.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 18:59, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
For me
Good one, Jean-Marc!
I hope my experience is better than yours. I'm in the middle of this process
on a live system, been building since Monday (it's an old 600MHz box)
If you can read this email, my system is still running
Michael
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
I would call
What change did you have to make to CHOST? 386 to 686? or something more
complicated?
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
For me, the problem was that I had to change CHOST...then I'll re-install
from scratch.
But I don't say Gentoo is bad, I say, I am bad at Gentoo !
On 9/8/06,
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to $DEITY, my mailer picked the tagline!
It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
this portage error.
Yes, I specified that it's
Mark Shields laebshade at gmail.com writes:
I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc,
so I can
make an ISO from the disc (I think it's a minimal install cd) and get
it to you
somehow.
-em
Yes, I think this is the best solution. That way it'll have profile
2006.1
[Rafael Barrera Oro] [User]
I entered the Linux world using SUSE, in time, it began to have
humongous circular dependencies problems which drove me crazy. When i
discover Gentoo, i found the portage system to be just what i was
waiting for, an outstanding feature.
Also:
Love the G that
I'm agree absolutely, I have switched to 4.1.1 already :-) Probably, it is
not a bad idea to add a note about this trap somewhere in the official guide.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 20:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to
Rumen Yotov rumen at qrypto.org writes:
I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc,
Hi James,
Did you tried passing some ON/OFF options when booting with
install-minimal-2006.1 (i mean gentoo acpi=off doscsi etc.)
HTH.Rumen
Hi Rumen,
I used gentoo-nofb for the
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with SSL.
Here is the error message from the startup:
Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so into
server: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so: undefined
User
I was attracted to Gentoo because it was different, and I'm attracted to
things like that.
Coming from a background of Slackware and Redhat, I fell in love with the ease
of portage
But I strongly believe one of the biggest strengths of Gentoo is this list. I
have learned more from reading
Dan Johansson wrote:
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with SSL.
Here is the error message from the startup:
Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so into
server:
-Original Message-
From: kashani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:03 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Using a Stage 4 on similar hardware
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
How much hardware leeway is safe to accept when using a
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:12, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Most of my problems came in the stage of the revdep-rebuild things
simply wouldn't build. I finally solved it by un-installing as many of
the offending packages as I could, multiple emerge --sync and about 10
attempts at
Hi,
Portage wants to downgrade MySQL on my PC. This appears to be due
to a revision being removed from portage:
lightning ~ # emerge -pvDuN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
SNIP
[ebuild UD] dev-db/mysql-4.0.27 [4.1.20]
Bo:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
The instructions specify to use Revdep-rebuild -- and I quote
If you upgrade from gcc 3.3 to 3.4, you have two possibilities on how to
upgrade your
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Cool -- that makes life very good indeed -- as far as I know the driver
configurations are essentially identical so that out to be easy -- the
processors are identical
I've got two sets of hardware, one has LSI scsi cards and e1000. The
other has SATA and tg3 network
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:29, Dan Johansson wrote:
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with
SSL.
Did you follow those steps?
[portage] ebuild log for dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8c
WARN: postinst
You must re-compile all packages that are linked against
-Original Message-
From: kashani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:14 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Using a Stage 4 on similar hardware
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Cool -- that makes life very good indeed -- as far as I
Hi!
All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
(Could take a couple of minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
.='update pass'
Mark Knecht wrote:
lightning ~ # eix -I mysql
* dev-db/mysql
Available versions: !3.23.58-r1 4.0.25-r2 4.0.27 [M]4.1.21
[M]5.0.24-r1 [M]5.1.7_beta
Installed: 4.1.20
Homepage:http://www.mysql.com/
Description: A fast, multi-threaded, multi-user SQL
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
indicated -
That
-Original Message-
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:36 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi!
All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
(Could take a
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like the problem comes from the samba-3-gentoo-0.3.14.tar.bz2
archive, which contains an entry for ./ dated from 2005-10-06. This
causes the work directory to have that date when the archive is
extracted, and confuses ebuild a bit because the
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:07, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:52, kashani wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with
SSL. Here is the error message from the startup:
Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
Cannot load
Hey All,
I was trying to install PHP and a couple other packages when I got the following error:
* Checking for required PHP feature(s) ...
* Discovered missing USE flag: unicode
*
* dev-lang/php-5.1.4-r6 needs to be re-installed with all of the following
* USE flags enabled:
*
* pcre session
Dale schrieb:
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
sure it is making sense. After three
On Friday 08 September 2006 15:00, Dale wrote:
I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade.
It is bug #125728 [1]? Otherwise if it continues consider posting the output
of:
#
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Dale schrieb:
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
sure it is
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've followed the GCC upgrade guide before without problems, but now
I'm scared. Is all the trouble because of how Gentoo works or how GCC
works? What is the trouble like? Packages that won't compile, or
different things breaking in the system?
Grant wrote:
My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100
memory as well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that
speed now. I'll have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the
Tualatin CPU, and I wonder how that will affect the PC-100
memory. Would it be better to buy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Richard Fish
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:50 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
On 9/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sort of have a problem with this. Maybe the info is in the change
logs?
Yes, you really should read the ChangeLog if you want anwers to such
questions. Looks like 4.1.21 was stabilized to solve a security bug
[1] [2].
up with 4.1.20 I think
My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100
memory as well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that
speed now. I'll have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the
Tualatin CPU, and I wonder how that will affect the PC-100
memory. Would it be better to buy good Kingston
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:59, Grant wrote:
My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100 memory as
well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that speed now. I'll
have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the Tualatin CPU,
In that case, you should buy as much 133MHz
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi!
All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
(Could take a couple of
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a system that I apparently built using the wrong stage 3
Make.conf has chost as i386 but it's a Pentium 4 box
Im just about to start the emerge eav system
Should I wait and /or fix something b4 I proceed?
You'll need to resolve
On 9/8/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sort of have a problem with this. Maybe the info is in the change
logs?
Yes, you really should read the ChangeLog if you want anwers to such
questions. Looks like 4.1.21 was stabilized to
On 9/8/06, Shawn Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to install PHP and a couple other packages when I got the
following error:
* Checking for required PHP feature(s) ...
* Discovered missing USE flag: unicode
*
* dev-lang/php-5.1.4-r6 needs to be re-installed with all of the
On 9/8/06, Shawn Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got portage updated, but when I went to run emerge -uD world I got the
following output:
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy sys-kernel/livecd-kernel.
(dependency required by media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.11-r1 [ebuild])
Looks like your
· Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm going from memory here, but when I had this error I recall to have solved
it by rsynching and then remerging portage. YMMV.
Hi!
Thanks for helping!
To solve this issue, I removed the portage tree and ran
emerge-webrsync followed by a normal sync and all was
On 9/8/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
broken /usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins/0/bankinfo/de.la (requires
/usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
Since you don't have aqbanking installed anymore, just delete these
files, and probably the entire /usr/lib/qabanking
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:22:51 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 9/7/06, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:22:51 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
of course, I also did glibc!
--
Peter
+
Do not reply to this email, it is a spam trap and not monitored.
I can be reached via this list, or via
jabber: pete4abw at jabber.org
ICQ: 73676357
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:36:57 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Why can't the ebuild be left on my
machine in some location so that the machine remains unaltered until I
decide it's worth dealing with?
The ebuild is on your machine, in /var/db/pkg/category/package-version/
Copy it to your overlay and
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:14:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la)
broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavcodec.la)
broken /usr/lib/libqbanking.la (requires /usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
broken
[user]I use and stay with Gentoo because it is the distro that I started with. I was used to windows before I used Gentoo, let alone linux. Once I got out of the windows way of thinking, then Gentoo and linux just kind of feel a bit natural. I've stayed with Gentoo because I haven't seen a good
On 9/8/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be entirely wrong on this, but I upgraded from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 and
did not re-emerge system or world.
Actually, with all due respect, it is unnecessary to recompile anything
other than the programs which depend on libstdc++.
Yeah, I thought
BTW, if you want to share your responses on-list, great, but you might
want to be sure to CC Chris as well, as he requested responses
off-list, indicating he may not read -user.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:12:44 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 9/8/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be entirely wrong on this, but I upgraded from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 and
did not re-emerge system or world.
Actually, with all due respect, it is unnecessary to recompile anything
other than
I can't figure out how to fix this one - NOT for lack of trying,
however.
I'm slowly trying to become more terminal-friendly and less
GUI-dependent. I also keep hearing how Emacs is so cool and powerful
and useful and blah. So I decided to try and learn it and see for
myself.
Installed it
Chris White wrote:
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, you
can put community or something if that's all you want. All responses off
list please. Thanks.
[user]
I'm not, but I
Grant wrote:
I'm going to try a Tualatin P3-1.26 in my i810E motherboard. I did a
ton of research and I think my motherboard will support it. It comes
down to whether or not it's a revision B board. lspci -v just says
(rev 3). eBay has it for $31 shipped and guaranteed not DOA.
My main
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 06:33:40PM -0500, Colleen Beamer wrote:
I'm not, but I *could* be a grandmother, so I guess I'm not the average
Well, I *couldn't* be a grandmother, because I am a grandfather who has
pretty much no clue what average is.
festus
--
In all the millions of years
Michael Crute wrote:
Methinks there is just a bit of FUD swirling around. I can't speak to
GCC 4.1 (may do it this afternoon) but the last time I did a GCC
upgrade (following the documentation) I had absolutely no problems
whatsoever. If you are really worried tar up your system as a backup
Hello,
I'm setting up a web server on a pII 400 MHz
system with a dual channel adaptec (ultra) scsi
controller. (2) ST-39173W Ultra SCSI Wide drives.
If I want maximum/optimized IO performance
from these drives what is the best file system
to use and drive configuration. (1/2) the swap space
on
-Original Message-
From: Colleen Beamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo
Chris White wrote:
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:43, James wrote:
If I want maximum/optimized IO performance
from these drives what is the best file system
to use and drive configuration. (1/2) the swap space
on each drive? Raid level? Other methods? EVMS(which
I know nothing about)?
Well what's the workload?
On 9/7/06, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All responses off list please. Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to them. :-)-- David Granthttp://www.davidgrant.ca
All responses off list please.
Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to
them. :-)
It's even more common sense not to ask for off-list answers to a on-list
post...
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Zac Slade krakrjak at volumehost.net writes:
Well what's the workload? Random reads, sequential reads, random writes,
sequential writes? All these are important to selecting the best method of
getting optimal I/O. There is no one perfect filesystem/raid level for
everything.
Hello
b.n. wrote:
All responses off list please.
Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to
them. :-)
It's even more common sense not to ask for off-list answers to a
on-list post...
m.
Plus some of us like to read them. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
--
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
