On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:27:20 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 15:47, Grant wrote:
I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
personally still love Gentoo.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:18:19 +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
On 18/12/06, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may, but you are confusing cause and effect. A distro with more
developers should be a better distro, and should have more users.
Well, Microsoft has proven that theory wrong ;-
If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g. 2006.0and
you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a 2006.1 profile is that
possible?
To be specific I would like if possible to have a live upgrade to stage3 but
with
using i586 compile instead of i686. I could rm -rf
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 11:38, Christian Nygaard wrote:
If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g.
2006.0and you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a 2006.1
profile is that possible?
You just change the profile. The differences in the profiles between
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:38, Christian Nygaard wrote:
If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g.
2006.0and you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a
2006.1 profile is that possible?
You appear to misunderstand what a profile is. It's nothing more than
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
But, if you insist, you can do this:
1. Change your CHOST in /etc/make.conf
2. Change the /etc/make.profile symplink to point to the profile of your
choice in /usr/portage/profiles
3. emerge -e system ; emerge -e world
Whoa! Your
Mark, just a note I am quite happy with x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-1.0.8776
working perfectly on oldy MX 440, because legacy drivers too much legacy and
are no good with both X session switching and GL while 1.0.9631 just crash
and 1.0.9742 do not support the card anymore. Since it is probably
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:22:24 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
emerge gentoo-bugger
bugger --keyword mod_perl
bugger --show 157239
I prefer www-client/pybugz.
# emerge pybugz
# bugz search mod_perl
# bugz get 157239
Nice :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Unix is user-friendly. It's just
On Monday 18 December 2006 23:19, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Mick wrote:
# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:0C:20:03:3B:C5
ESSID:The Cairngorm Hotel
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
My desktop machine at home is still on 2005.0 profile and yet, it is a
fully up to date x86 system. If I were to make it a 2006.1 profile,
it's very unlikely that anything would change at all.
In this case, I expect there would be
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:12, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
But, if you insist, you can do this:
1. Change your CHOST in /etc/make.conf
2. Change the /etc/make.profile symplink to point to the profile of
your choice in
El Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
First, why do you want to downgrade from i686 to i586? Do you have an
original pentium chip and you specified i686 by mistake? There's no
other valid reason I can think of for such a downgrade.
Unless there is a
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
My desktop machine at home is still on 2005.0 profile and yet, it
is a fully up to date x86 system. If I were to make it a 2006.1
profile, it's very unlikely that anything would
Hi
Has anybody else ran into this?
Emerging (488 of 792) x11-misc/googleearth-4_beta to /
Resuming download...
Downloading 'http://dl.google.com/earth/GE4/GoogleEarthLinux.bin'
--04:47:57-- http://dl.google.com/earth/GE4/GoogleEarthLinux.bin
=
On 12/18/06, Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 21:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
The commands are unclear to me in the sense that I may need to
rebuild the kernel, or not, after running them. I cannot tell. Any
idea?
Well, before running make oldconfig, you should
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
Hi
Has anybody else ran into this?
[snip]
It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug or
is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it then
pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and it takes
On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
Hi
Has anybody else ran into this?
[snip]
It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug or
is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it
I apologise in advance for this question being tenuously related to
Gentoo... My justification is only that I really like my Gentoo-based
Postfix /dovecot mail-server... but I also want to push emails to a
connected Windows Mobile 5 PDA/phone.
Historically mobile devices have polled for email
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:10, Dale wrote:
It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug
or is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it
then pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and it takes
about 2 hours for this download, I would
Mick wrote:
# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:0C:20:03:3B:C5
ESSID:The Cairngorm Hotel
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz
Encryption key:off
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
Hi
Has anybody else ran into this?
[snip]
It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a
bug or
is it just me? It does the same thing
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:27:04AM +0300, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
Where can I get data on the number of Gentoo users and how it changes with
time? Are the sync servers reporting the number of portage trees? Are the
numbers of subscribers to Gentoo mailing lists available? Can the number
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:10, Dale wrote:
It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug
or is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it
then pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and it takes
about 2 hours for
I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a second processor and
some more memory. I figured that to take advantage of that processor, all I
needed to do was recompile to kernel, reboot, and set -j3 in the make.conf
file.
However, there must be something else, since when I try
On 2006-12-17, Luigi Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I burn a 8.5 GByte iso? I tried with k3b and I receive an error
and growisofs failed at 99.9% with input/output error.
Growisofs works fine on dual-layer DVDs for me.
I did have some failures when using a drive that was in an
On 2006-12-18, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
personally still love Gentoo.
AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
--
Grant Edwards
On 12/19/06, Joel Osburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a second processor and some more
memory. I figured that to take advantage of that processor, all I needed to do was
recompile to kernel, reboot, and set -j3 in the make.conf file.
On AD 2006 December 19 Tuesday 05:23:10 PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
I'll grant you that.
Justin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
What is it?
eix says Framebuffer internationalized terminal emulator and the
homepage is supposed to be
http://www-124.ibm.com/linux/projects/iterm/;
It seems this is a IBM decoy, since it gets mercilessly redirected to
http://www.ibm.com/us/
(I really really hate this kind of behaviour!)
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 22:35 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
x86_64 is the generic name for amd64, emt64, and x64 (see below) so that is
correct for the CHOST setting for that architecture. Chips using that
architecture are also generally happy running as a x86 CHOST.
For Itanium,
Hi all,
I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use -march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for Core
2 Solo/Duo
Currently I'm using:
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium-m -pipe
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
MAKEOPTS=-j3
and
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use -march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for
Core 2 Solo/Duo
3. They mentiont to use a amd64
On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 9:42, Jakob wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strage problem, some month ago I bougth a new laptop (Core2duo
1,83 Ghz + Geforce 7600).
The first thing I did was installing gentoo, and after X was finished I
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/19/06, Joel Osburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a
second processor and some more memory. I figured that to
take advantage of that processor, all I needed to do was
recompile to kernel, reboot, and set
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use -march=nocona (and an amd64
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
Thaks for the quick reply.
On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use:
CFLAGS=-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
Is this wat you meant for better -march
My portage overlay has moved from git.jhcloos.org to freedesktop.org.
If you have a clone, please edit .git/remotes/origin and replace the
old URL with either of:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~cloos/overlay.git
http://people.freedesktop.org/~cloos/overlay.git
(http is there for those
On 12:53 Tue 19 Dec , Steve [Gentoo] wrote:
I apologise in advance for this question being tenuously related to
Gentoo... My justification is only that I really like my Gentoo-based
Postfix /dovecot mail-server... but I also want to push emails to a
connected Windows Mobile 5 PDA/phone.
What is your strategical vision to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
64-bit) alternatives? Is it smart to hope Gentoo AMD64 FAQ will
be thiner and thiner during upcoming months? :-)
=== On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:13, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: ===
... Of course, it's
getting harder and
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
Thaks for the quick reply.
On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use:
CFLAGS=-march=prescott -O2 -pipe
On 12/19/06, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
Thaks for the quick reply.
On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:56, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
do I have to run emerge -avuD world after changing to -march=prescott?
No, that's not required.
--
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
What is your strategical vision to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
64-bit) alternatives?
All (well, very nearly all) the software I need is available in 64-bit
versions, partially
Have you tried hugin
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
I think its in portage
Kumar
On 12/14/06, Arnau Bria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:30:17 +
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
Hello Arnau
Hi,
I'm sorry I didn't understand what you were looking for.
It's ok, I must improve
Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal (I assume
genkernel) build process.
cd to /usr/src/linuxyour version
as root type make mrproper
This will ensure that your build tree is pristene.
Now you should be able to run genkernel without problems.
---BeginMessage---
I have an
From: Maurice E Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:03 PM
Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal
(I assume genkernel) build process.
I don't use genkernel, never have. I did try the following:
copy the .config to another directory,
Picasa does awesome mosaics.
Alan
On 12/20/06, Kumar Golap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried hugin
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
I think its in portage
Kumar
On 12/14/06, Arnau Bria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:30:17 +
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
Hello Arnau
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 11:27 +0300, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:27:20 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(there is a report somewhere in the thread that the number of
developers increased from 60 to 300 in 3 days, but a finer time scale is
of
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 00:09, Joel Osburn wrote:
From: Maurice E Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:03 PM
Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal
(I assume genkernel) build process.
I don't use genkernel, never have. I did try
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
Gabriel
Adam Carter wrote:
I had a similar issue with the gnome clock, I tried a number of things
to get it working but I think revdep-rebuild -X was the winner. Emerge
gentoolkit if you don't have it.
HTH,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
What is your strategical vision to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
64-bit) alternatives?
All (well, very nearly all)
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:58 +0100, Jakob wrote:
On 12/19/06, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
...
for now I will stick with 32bit, I think I will Install 64bit to
I
personally still love Gentoo.
What's the problem then? :)
Can we agree that active developers are good for Gentoo, and the more
the better?
I think other posters to this thread may be trying to compile a
similar set of statistics, but I'll just come out and say it. Can we
compare
I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
personally still love Gentoo.
AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
--
Grant Edwards
{OT}
Have you noticed that Grants love other Grants? I
Grant wrote:
I
personally still love Gentoo.
Well, I don't know anything ... I'm just a lowly user, not a tech
I'd never compiled a kernel before using Gentoo or wrote a configuration
file.
However, I have to say that, for me, Gentoo is hands down the easiest
distro to maintain. It has
Can you help with this please?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3793329.html#3793329
thanks
LN
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Anyone using an Apple USB keyboard with Gentoo Linux?
Specifically, Im running XFCE4 and want to figure out how to map some
keys and get some missing functionality. How can I set these up with
X11/XFCE? Also, I can't seem to switch between X11 and the console (I
think I can't even switch
Colleen Beamer wrote:
Grant wrote:
I
personally still love Gentoo.
Well, I don't know anything ... I'm just a lowly user, not a tech
I'd never compiled a kernel before using Gentoo or wrote a configuration
file.
However, I have to say that, for me, Gentoo is hands down
On 20 December 2006 03:58, Grant wrote:
I think other posters to this thread may be trying to compile a
similar set of statistics, but I'll just come out and say it. Can we
compare historical data on the number of Gentoo users and the rate of
Gentoo maintenance and growth? Conceptually, I
Is there a tool to query a portage to get a list of all packages which
have 'testing' or 'stable' status for x86 and have 'not available' or
'hard masked' status for amd64?
=== On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:38, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
===
...
Is it smart to hope Gentoo AMD64
60 matches
Mail list logo
