-Original Message-
From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader
I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else,
but what I _don't_ like is when
sain yan escribió:
Hi
My box can`t link to internet , I using rp-pppoe I think it work fine,
when run pppoe-start I get internet IP and the right DNS informention
in /etc/resolv.conf ，but ping google.com http://google.com ,
unknewn name, ping IP is rest
why??
--
On Thursday 19 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'RE:
[gentoo-user] 2 to 3??':
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't like the GPLv3, you probably didn't
*really* like the GPLv2 and might be more interested
in licensing
On Thursday 19 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'RE:
[gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader':
I have seen many of them that the man page and the
info page were identicle. More often though it looked
like they made a decent man page, and coppied it to info.
info automatically pulls man
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Marco Calviani wrote:
Hi,
i have a problem with NFS. A partition mounted on machine gentoo1
is correctly exported and mounted in gentoo2 (that is, it is possible
to read and write on it). However whenever i try to execute a program
from gentoo2 that it is stored
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Stroller wrote:
It's enough to make the
average person's head spin (and does) - it can easily take two
hours for me to get a class full of reasonably bright Windows
techies to grasp ...
You clearly have more experience than I do with teaching novices
about
Hi James and the others,
thank you very much, this option made the trick.
Regards,
marco
On 7/19/07, James Ausmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
man mount
/user
gets you (*'s added by me for easy find):
user Allow an ordinary user to mount the file system. The
name of the
On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hendrik Boom
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:35 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] [OT] English sucks (was: Re:
Installation
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:55:58 +0930 Iain Buchanan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, but
what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info, and one of
them is very deficient (in grub's case, man). The description is
different, less
Hey all,
I was hoping we've got some IPv6 experts around, as I've got some issues
I've been banging my head against for 2 days.
Very briefly our network is a gentoo firewall box with 5 interfaces, 1 to the
internet,
and 4 to private networks (192.168.xxx.0/24). What I would like to do is
assign
On Thursday 19 July 2007 13:45, Mike Williams wrote:
I can add dead:beef:2::11/64 (yes, /64) to the internet side of
router/firewall, a default route via dead:beef:2::1 and then happily
ping ipv6 things on the internet.
Ok, so your ipv6 link to your provider (and to the ipv6 Internet) is
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:00 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??
I totally agree here. (Of course, I think the Free Software vs.
Proprietary Software war is just
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:36 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:55:58 +0930 Iain Buchanan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, but
what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info, and one of
them is very
On Thursday 19 July 2007 14:56, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
IIUC, icmpv6 echo request packets enter the router/firewall from the
bond2 interface, and leave the box using the bond0 interface
(confirming that forwarding works). But, the router/firewall is trying
to get the link-layer address of the
On Thursday 19 July 2007 13:56:23 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Ok, just some shots in the dark:
- Do the hosts also get the default router, along with the ipv6 address?
You can check with ip -6 route. You should get, among the others, a
default route pointing to the ipv6 link local (fe80:) address of
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:02, Mike Williams wrote:
I hadn't configured the subnet router anycast address, but I can
still ping it. Again makes no difference if it's specified or not.
Ok, then probably the linux implementation recognizes it anyway. But it
seems this is not the issue here.
On Thursday 19 July 2007 16:12:18 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
More precisely, it seems that these neighbor solicitation messages come
from the far end router, like it somehow believes that your internal
host is on its same subnet, and is trying to resolve its ipv6 address to
its link layer address
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:00, Mike Williams wrote:
fe80::214:f600:b67e:b4db is the link local address of the upstream
router, which is also configured as dead:beef:2::1/48.
Strictly speaking, if it's taken from the same block, it should be at
least /49; otherwise, they would uncorrectly
Hi,
I recently recompiled amarok with the musicbrainz USE flag enabled, to
allow tagging of mp3 files with musicbrainz.
However, when I try to Edit tag information... the Fill-in tags using
MusicBrainz button is always disabled. It tells me to install
Musicbrainz, but it's installed.
What
Hello,
I seem to have an adventure every time I set up a dual boot
laptop with Windows and Gentoo.
The last time I found out that HP will ship you an OEM install
CD so after formatting the hard drive (deleting the windows
hidden partition) you can put windows on any partition you want
and not
On 7/19/07, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I seem to have an adventure every time I set up a dual boot
laptop with Windows and Gentoo.
The last time I found out that HP will ship you an OEM install
CD so after formatting the hard drive (deleting the windows
hidden partition) you can
Last year I bought a Dell Inspiron that did not come with any software
cd. The drive, came with XP pre-installed as well as a recovery
partition that you could use to restore the XP partition to factory. Of
course it runs Gentoo. What I did was:
1. Boot with a live cd (or better yet
Julian Simioni spectre256 at gmail.com writes:
Depending on what software you need to run, running Windows in VMware
can work quite well.
VMware is not an option. We use the laptops for embedded systems development.
Most Semiconductor companies still require you use Windows for their
Albert Hopkins marduk at gentoo.org writes:
1. Boot with a live cd (or better yet RIPLinux on a USB stick).
RIP Linux looks very cool. No experience with this but, hey I'm going to
try and use this...
I'm not sure if Vista versus XP make any difference. In a recent post
on this list
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:51:32 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:00, Mike Williams wrote:
Etaoin, thanks for you time.
I fear I would fail basic routing, which is surprising, seeing how I do
similar things with IPv4 networks!
These addresses are all supposed to be properly
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 17:58 +, James wrote:
Albert Hopkins marduk at gentoo.org writes:
[...]
I'm not sure if Vista versus XP make any difference. In a recent post
on this list about grub one reader posted about the fact that with
Vista the boot.ini file is gone. I'm not sure that
Am Donnerstag 19 Juli 2007 21:01 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 17:58 +, James wrote:
Albert Hopkins marduk at gentoo.org writes:
[...]
I'm not sure if Vista versus XP make any difference. In a recent post
on this list about grub one reader posted about the fact that
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:29 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Well, actually we are using both (chainloading ntldr by grub) and if you are
changing the partition scheme, you might need to work with it.
Sorry I was confused.
[...]
Sorry when I said boot via liveCD I wasn't specifically
On 7/17/07, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:24 -0500, Billy Wayne McCann wrote:
My purpose for pasting this into this discussion is three-fold: to
show
why I said what I did, to hopefully dispel the notion that I merely
made
this all up, and to discuss the
Albert Hopkins marduk at gentoo.org writes:
I've been using RIPLinux for 3 years and haven't had any issues with it.
Ok Albert,
I'm convinced. I'm going to give your suggestions a whirl.
One cautious step I'm adding as suggested, is to back up the
virgin drive with DD.
I'm looking for a
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:45 +, James wrote:
Ok Albert,
I'm convinced. I'm going to give your suggestions a whirl.
One cautious step I'm adding as suggested, is to back up the
virgin drive with DD.
I'm looking for a cable so that I can copy the sony drive
onto a gentoo partition of
On 7/19/07, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently recompiled amarok with the musicbrainz USE flag enabled, to
allow tagging of mp3 files with musicbrainz.
However, when I try to Edit tag information... the Fill-in tags using
MusicBrainz button is always disabled. It tells me to install
On 19 Jul 2007, at 23:22, Albert Hopkins wrote:
...
I'm looking for a cable so that I can copy the sony drive
onto a gentoo partition of another system via a usb 2.0 to
ata/eide cable.
It was suggested this cable:
ttp://tinyurl.com/ynhszy [sic]
But being in Florida...
These are really easy
Thanks very much indeed for your help, James.
On 19 Jul 2007, at 00:47, James Ausmus wrote:
snip
If anyone has time to change XSESSION=Xsession and log on to their
machine as a new user I would be grateful to hear what results they
get. I can't help wondering if this is a little-tested
My laptop (inspiron 6400) has an intel 3945 wireless chip and hence I
use net-wireless/ipw3945{,d,-ucode}.
If I include ipw3945 in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6, I get an
error msg during boot
Failed to load ipw3945
However, everything works fine. Specifically, ifconfig shows that the
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:57:01 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
What is the clean way to do this? Currently I am using the first
method above and averting my eyes when the yellow star is to appear.
I have exactly the same laptop, with the wireless assigned to eth1. net.eth1
is not run in any runlevel,
At Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:05:27 +0930 Novensiles divi Flamen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have exactly the same laptop, with the wireless assigned to eth1. net.eth1
is not run in any runlevel, but is launched from udev.
Sounds good. I assume you do *not* have ipw3945 in
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:38:12 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Sounds good. I assume you do *not* have ipw3945 in
/etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6. If my guess is wrong, do you get
the boot-time error message I mentioned (Failed to load ipw3945).
Your guess is correct, it is not in there.
My
At Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:19:55 +0930 Novensiles divi Flamen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I used to have the modules load , which initiated the ipw3945d with an error
that it can't start until runlevel three, then it worked perfectly once that
runlevel was reached. Now it loads the module but
39 matches
Mail list logo
