Neil Bothwick wrote:
> It' one of those things[1] that you put off using because it looks
> complicated. then you get round to trying it and wish you'd done so much
> earlier.
>
> [1] Screen falls into this category too.
I can confirm about screen, I use it everywhere now. But I've yet to try
LVM
Jim Burwell wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Philip Webb wrote:
>>
>>> 071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
>>>
This question "Is LVM a good idea?" keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
and have yet to find a valid downside for ge
Dale wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
>> 071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> This question "Is LVM a good idea?" keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
>>> I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
>>> and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
>>>
>>
>> If you haven't used it, i
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:12:10 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > > On a mixed stable/unstable x86, which binutils should one generally
> > > use?
> >
> > So why do you use multislot at all?
>
> On a previous job (long ago now) I was switching gcc's and needed
> multislot. Now I dont. I presume if I rem
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 03:24 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
> > inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
> > is in (not listed below)
> >
> > bun
Not an elegant solution, or one that sheds any light on
the nature of the problem, but this process worked for me:
1) Removed everything from the default run level except for
the system logger and net.eth0.
2) Rebooted and started nfs by hand successfully after the
reboot. Added nfs
Liviu Andronic writes:
> So, my eternal question, is it realistic for the "lost" RAM data to be
> recovered? That is, after system shutdown, does the data still
> physically reside on the RAM and can someone with a decent technology
> and know-how recover it? In other words, is this a serious brea
Philip Webb wrote:
> 071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> This question "Is LVM a good idea?" keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
>> I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
>> and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
>>
>
> If you haven't used it, it looks like a questio
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
> inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
> is in (not listed below)
>
> bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16
> [2] i686-pc-l
Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
is in (not listed below)
bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16.1 *
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.17
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu
Hello Philip Webb,
> If you haven't used it, it looks like a questionable extra complexity,
> which could bite your fingers unexpectedly for little real gain.
It' one of those things[1] that you put off using because it looks
complicated. then you get round to trying it and wish you'd done so muc
At Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:08:40 +0200 Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether the software compiled against newer headers will still work
> depends solely on the kernel. In your example, when you also decide to
> run a 2.6.10 kernel, then the software relying on newer features (due
> t
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:25:23 +0200
Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
>
> I'm looking for some info in gentoo wiki and I think I have all fine:
>
> APACHE2_OPTS="-D DEFAULT_VHOST -D SSL -D PHP5"
> in conf.d/apache
And y
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:44:21 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, example. I might be totally wrong, so don't believe me:
> The splice system call was added with 2.6.17 and corresponding headers. If
> you build an application that has optinal (on compile time) support
071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> This question "Is LVM a good idea?" keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
> I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
> and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
If you haven't used it, it looks like a questionable extra complexity,
which could bite
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 schrieb Thufir:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:05:56 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Yes. Mount it, (recursivly) change the group of the top level directory
> > and give group write permissions, then add all users which should have
> > full access to that group (they need to l
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:11:30 -0400
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to polish off a gentoo install on a COMPAQ R3000 with
> Broadcom 4306 wireless chips...
>
> I can manually setup a solid 54M connection without much effort, but
> trying to get it done automatically is trou
Arnau Bria wrote:
> You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
I actually just did this upgrade as well, and also found php not to work
(and revdep-rebuild didn't catch it). Re-emerge php and look in
/etc/apache2/modules.d for the mod_php file. If you've got that and
you'v
Tim wrote:
> Change the TypesConfig directive in Apache2 to the location of your
> mime.types file (in this case, /etc/mime.types).
So I ended up just clobbering my configs and starting over with the
default ones because lots of things were being "weird". Now I just have
to figure out how to do a
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:05:56 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Yes. Mount it, (recursivly) change the group of the top level directory
> and give group write permissions, then add all users which should have
> full access to that group (they need to logout/login to change their
> group membership in
Thank you Liviu
Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez wrote:
> Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
> does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Desktop settings > Behaviour > Desktop Icons > Choose "File/launcher icons"
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to polish off a gentoo install on a COMPAQ R3000 with
Broadcom 4306 wireless chips...
I can manually setup a solid 54M connection without much effort, but
trying to get it done automatically is troublesome...
I setup a softlevel named "wireless". I deleted the net.eth0 hardware
connec
Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> my current default gcc is of version 4.1.2 but I would like to
> switch to version 4.2.1.
>
> As root (only) I can do
>
> gcc-config i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.2.1
>
> but this switch is lost after re-login.
> Furthermore I cannot switch in non-root mode.
> (BTW I'm
On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Fernando for the info. I followed your
> instructions and now my pen gets mounted. :))
>
> Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
> does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
>
> Thanks
Sorry, I don´t know ho
On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
> does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Desktop settings > Behaviour > Desktop Icons > Choose "File/launcher icons"
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Thank you Fernando for the info. I followed your
instructions and now my pen gets mounted. :))
Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Antunes wrote:
> On 10/5/07, Fernando
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:27:16 +0200
Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why so many changes in this upgrade?¿?
> > You'd best ask the Apache devs. I thought the changelog for 2.2.6
> > was quite short myself.
> Well, it was more a rhetorical question, but thanks for your reply :-)
A nu
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:43:08 +0100
Steve Dommett wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
> Have you run revdep-rebuild, or even simply manually re-emerged PHP
> after updating Apache?
Both, I always do a revdep-rebu
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
> You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
Have you run revdep-rebuild, or even simply manually re-emerged PHP after
updating Apache?
> not sure if all those dir should be empty...
> could you please confirm?
I have only php.ini
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:52:41 +0100
Steve Dommett wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
> > Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in
> > firefox:
>
> I'm just guessing, but Apache 2.2.6 removed
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
> My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
> Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in firefox:
I'm just guessing, but Apache 2.2.6 removed "index.htm" from the list of
default index files. It may be possibl
On Monday 08 October 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Extra benefits of LVM: You won't need this right now for your
> > simple desktop with one drive, but it's good to know what else LVM
> > can do:
> >
> > Snapshots.
>
> Well, I "disagree". This feature i
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Extra benefits of LVM: You won't need this right now for your simple
> desktop with one drive, but it's good to know what else LVM can do:
>
> Snapshots.
Well, I "disagree". This feature is also very useful on a
single drive setup. Reason why: Backup.
Hi,
my current default gcc is of version 4.1.2 but I would like to
switch to version 4.2.1.
As root (only) I can do
gcc-config i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.2.1
but this switch is lost after re-login.
Furthermore I cannot switch in non-root mode.
(BTW I'm using the zshell)
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmu
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 schrieb ext Thufir:
> I seem to have the permissions wrong in fstab. On boot I do have an icon
> on the desktop for the LVM volume, which can be browsed as root, but not
> as a user.
>
> I want read/write permissions to the LVM volume as user "thufir" (or any
> user, rea
Hi,
My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in firefox:
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
and looking error log file:
Directory index forbidden by Options directive: /var/www/www.site.com/htdo
I seem to have the permissions wrong in fstab. On boot I do have an icon
on the desktop for the LVM volume, which can be browsed as root, but not
as a user.
I want read/write permissions to the LVM volume as user "thufir" (or any
user, really). Can this be done?
arrakis ~ #
arrakis ~ # fdi
Shouldn't the scroll wheel in gthumb cycle through, browse, the images
rather than change the magnification on a specific image? Can this be
changed? I found Ubuntu references on this, nothing gentoo specific.
thanks,
Thufir
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
38 matches
Mail list logo
