On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 23:19 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 09:48:10 am Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
I believe that I have this enabled, however ieee80211 is still barfing
out by asking for CONFIG_NET_RADIO.
I'll check and
On Saturday 15 December 2007 20:00:54 Grant wrote:
The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is
Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in
it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of
activity in the tree but new
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 20:00:54 Grant wrote:
The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is
Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in
it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of
activity
The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is
Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in
it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of
activity in the tree but new desired features cannot be used in the
tree
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:20:38 -0600
Dale wrote:
...[snip]...
I read a link provided earlier about Plaudis, (sp?). It seems that
Portage has a lot of hacks in it, according to what I read anyway. Is
that true? Also, is it being wrote with python hurting portage as for
as the program itself?
On Sunday 16 December 2007 01.17.42 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:55:43 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
- why didn't portage replace the old version itself? That's generally
part of the update process.
GnuPG is slotted, so 1.* and 2.* can be installed simultaneously.
No.
David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:20:38 -0600
Dale wrote:
...[snip]...
I read a link provided earlier about Plaudis, (sp?). It seems that
Portage has a lot of hacks in it, according to what I read anyway. Is
that true? Also, is it being wrote with python hurting portage as
All I get for iwconfig is
lo no wireless extensions
eth0no wireless extensions.
I think I need some more info in /etc/conf.d/net, and need somehow to create
the necessary /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 or whatever driver.
The only 'net.anything' drivers present at the moment are net.lo
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:05:17 -0600
Dale wrote:
David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:20:38 -0600
Dale wrote:
...[snip]...
I read a link provided earlier about Plaudis, (sp?). It seems that
Portage has a lot of hacks in it, according to what I read
anyway. Is that true?
I have installed vsftpd but it's not working. When I try to retrieve a
file, not much happens.
wget -nd ftp://localhost/test.txt; produces:
--11:23:39-- ftp://localhost/test.txt
= `test.txt'
Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1
Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:21... connected.
On 12/16/07, David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed vsftpd but it's not working. When I try to retrieve a
file, not much happens.
wget -nd ftp://localhost/test.txt; produces:
--11:23:39-- ftp://localhost/test.txt
= `test.txt'
Resolving localhost...
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
All I get for iwconfig is
lono wireless extensions
eth0 no wireless extensions.
This means that the driver has not been loaded yet. In generic terms you'll
need to install the necessary driver for your WiFi device (either the new
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Logging in as anonymous ...
Login incorrect.
Is vsftpd setup for `anonymous'
From vsftpd.conf
Logging in as anonymous ...
# Allow anonymous FTP? (Beware - allowed by default if you
# comment this out).
anonymous_enable=NO =
I don't allow
Hi all,
What tools would I want to look into so that I could scan my
network to determine all the devices currently on it, either by IP or
name?
Extra points for a tool that can keep track of what time a device
was added to the network.
If it matters, my network is a wireless router and
On Saturday 15 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean if
you connect it to any machine in the diagram or elsewhere wouldn't you
be exposing that machine to the unfiltered internet?
I think that's the idea here -
On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for
This is what happens when you hit TAB twice when
running bash. So either
you hit TAB or a couple TAB characters \t\t were in
the input stream
Not TAB, but ESC, which I hit multi times to monitor
progress whenever the console went to sleep. Could
that have done it?
mw
David Relson wrote:
IMHO, python is a very nice object oriented language and C++ is no
better (unless you need particular features of the language). I
suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here. As I
understand, portage needs to deal with lots of special cases and
I want to set up two portable 1TB drives so users have their own LVM
partitions to mount as crypto drives. These partitions would have to
be mounted manually with the passpharse supplied by each user (this is
a family setup, just a few users). But I want the system to be able
to backup one 1TB
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:38:44 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Logging in as anonymous ...
Login incorrect.
Is vsftpd setup for `anonymous'
From vsftpd.conf
Logging in as anonymous ...
# Allow anonymous FTP? (Beware - allowed by default
On Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
David Relson wrote:
IMHO, python is a very nice object oriented language and C++ is no
better (unless you need particular features of the language). I
suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here. As I
understand,
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 11:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to set up two portable 1TB drives so users have their own LVM
partitions to mount as crypto drives. These partitions would have to
be mounted manually with the passpharse supplied by each user (this is
a family setup, just a
On 16/12/2007, Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Relson wrote:
IMHO, python is a very nice object oriented language and C++ is no
better (unless you need particular features of the language). I
suspect C++ runs somewhat faster, but that's not the issue here. As I
understand,
[...]
Just think about this horror: gcc/libstdc++ update and your package manager
stops working
Hehehehe. Guess what python is linked against (It doesn't have to be
linked against libstdc++, but it usually is)? =P
CPython is written in C and has no C++ dependencies:
$ ldd `which
On Sunday 16 December 2007 20:32:58 Randy Barlow wrote:
C++ is most certainly going to yield faster programs since it is a
machine compiled language and python is interpreted.
In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for a
package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hemmann, Volker Armin ha scritto:
On Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
David Relson wrote:
IMHO, python is a very nice object oriented language and C++ is no
better (unless you need particular features of the language). I
suspect
On 16/12/2007, Antonio Quartulli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And with c++ comes another one: abi changes.
Just think about this horror: gcc/libstdc++ update and your package manager
stops working
Why don't a python upgrade break your package manager??
Also possible, but less
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
one reason pro phyton and contra c and c++ has always been: segfaults.
And with c++ comes another one: abi changes.
Just think about this horror: gcc/libstdc++ update and your package manager
stops working
Well segfaults generally indicate bugs in your
Matan Peled wrote:
I see you haven't read the portage source-code. It isn't so elegant...
And I'm saying this as someone who likes python and thinks it is
generally a Good Idea.
No, I definitely have not, but I have done some Python coding in my
days. I was referring to the language, not the
On Sunday 16 December 2007 22:04:52 Randy Barlow wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for
a package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no matter which language you
use...
Yeah, you are right - although there is one step of an
On 18:36 Sun 16 Dec , Mick wrote:
On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:15:12 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
other fs.
Alternatively, you could do the same with the in-kernel ecryptfs. These
two solutions work in
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
other fs.
No, I want each user to have their own volume, manually mouinted with
a passphrase. For
On Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
one reason pro phyton and contra c and c++ has always been: segfaults.
And with c++ comes another one: abi changes.
Just think about this horror: gcc/libstdc++ update and your package
manager stops
On 16 Dec 2007, at 17:14, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
Running the command 'dmesg | grep rtl8187' after reboot returns
the message
usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8187
All I get for iwconfig is
lo no wireless extensions
eth0no
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Stroller wrote:
On 16 Dec 2007, at 17:14, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
Running the command 'dmesg | grep rtl8187' after reboot returns
the message
usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8187
All I get for iwconfig is
lo
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 18:42 +, Mick wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007, Rumen Yotov wrote:
On (10/12/07 10:37) Iain Buchanan wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgraded from hibernate-script-1.97-r3 to
hibernate-script-1.97-r4, and now at every stage of the suspend to disk
and resume
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anonymous_enable=YES is set.
I won't be able to help beyond that, but I'm sure others will. I
remember having a hard time with vsftpd and anonymous too. But it
suddenly hit me after messing with it for a good while that I had no
need of anonymous since
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw the installation of vmware and the generation of a virtual image
as
more involved than what I suggest above. Using the raw logs from the router
and filtering/sorting these through a spreadsheet would probably make them
easier to read. Anyway,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 09:53:08PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:15:12 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
other fs.
Alternatively, you could
I had some .avi's that I wanted to burn, so I went out and bought a 10pack of
Fujifilm DVD-R media (4.7GB) and fired up K3b. However, it kept asking me to
insert a writable disk even though I put fresh disk after fresh disk in the
drive.
So I resorted to growisofs. I had an ISO I wanted to
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:19:14 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anonymous_enable=YES is set.
I won't be able to help beyond that, but I'm sure others will. I
remember having a hard time with vsftpd and anonymous too. But it
suddenly hit me after
I bought a NexStar MX dual SATA enclosure and two 1TB drives for it.
It has an internal switch to select it appearing as a single 2TB drive
or two separate 1TB drives. I eventually want it to be the single
drive, but I want it as two separate drives initially. However, it
doesn't work that way.
On 16 Dec 2007, at 22:56, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Stroller wrote:
On 16 Dec 2007, at 17:14, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
Running the command 'dmesg | grep rtl8187' after reboot returns
the message
usbcore: registered new interface driver
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel config does NOT set CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN, if that makes
any difference.
it should. Please set it. Oh, and don't forget - in 'single disk mode' you
might loose everything if one of the two disks dies.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:38:40AM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel config does NOT set CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN, if that makes
any difference.
it should. Please set it. Oh, and don't forget - in 'single disk mode' you
It all started like this: Using rsync I was getting an error when
ever I used the `--stats' flag. The output said it was an error in
the stack ... Rather than mess with it, I thought I might take the
opportunity to sync portage and see if a newer rsync was available.
Its been a mnth or so since
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:23:35PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
Anyone else want to chime in
I am by no means an expert or even close personal friend of Pythion or
gentoo, but that won't stop me. Portage installs pretty quickly;
wouldn't it be possible to just do everything manually? It's not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:23:35PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
Anyone else want to chime in
I am by no means an expert or even close personal friend of Pythion or
gentoo, but that won't stop me. Portage installs pretty quickly;
wouldn't it be possible to
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 22:23 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
It kind of
makes me chuckle a bit that emerge -vC portage doesn't at least warn
you
that this will make a mess of your system (Are you sure?)
# emerge -Ca portage
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 18:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:38:40AM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel config does NOT set CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN, if that makes
any difference.
it should.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:00:32PM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
don't ask me, I only work here... but I have a multimedia unit that
has 4 card reader slots, a HD, an LCD and USB2. Only /dev/sda shows up
if I don't set the multiple luns option, and /dev/sda isn't the HD!
It's the (usually
On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:00:32PM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
don't ask me, I only work here... but I have a multimedia unit that
has 4 card reader slots, a HD, an LCD and USB2. Only /dev/sda shows up
if I don't set the multiple luns
53 matches
Mail list logo
