I've been experiencing failures trying to emerge sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5
Here are the information:
emerge --info =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5: http://pastebin.com/vCWDbYwH
build.log : http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/view.php?id=2720253da=y
(1MB, zipped into 61KB)
environment :
On Sunday 03 April 2011 15:13:09 luis jure wrote:
on 2011-04-03 at 10:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
It's been done on a C-64, but I think a 3.5KB box with no mass storage
might be a little too challenging.
3.5? wow, i always thought that the name meant it had 20K... like the C64
and C128. but no.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 16:04, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 15:13:09 luis jure wrote:
on 2011-04-03 at 10:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
It's been done on a C-64, but I think a 3.5KB box with no mass storage
might be a little too challenging.
3.5? wow, i always
On Friday 01 April 2011 21:56:47 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 13:18:39 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
I have APACHE2_OPTS=-D DEFAULT_VHOST -D INFO -D LANGUAGE -D PHP5
you should try at least language and php5 !
That missing 5 is important - thanks.
Then, however, I got this:
On Monday 04 April 2011 11:13:58 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 16:04, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 15:13:09 luis jure wrote:
on 2011-04-03 at 10:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
It's been done on a C-64, but I think a 3.5KB box with no mass storage
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 16:35, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 11:13:58 Pandu Poluan wrote:
Oh, the nostalgy... :-)
My first computer I believe was an Apple ][, a hand-down from an
uncle. It ran only for 1-2 weeks before it went to the Bit Bucket in
the Sky.
On Monday 04 April 2011 11:49:02 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 16:35, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 11:13:58 Pandu Poluan wrote:
When its floppy drive (5.25) gave up the ghost, I got another
hand-down; a PC-XT compatible no-name with a huge
On Monday 04 April 2011 10:56:43 Pandu Poluan wrote:
I've been experiencing failures trying to emerge sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5
Here are the information:
emerge --info =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5: http://pastebin.com/vCWDbYwH
build.log : http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/view.php?id=2720253da=y
(1MB,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 18:41, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 10:56:43 Pandu Poluan wrote:
I've been experiencing failures trying to emerge sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5
Here are the information:
emerge --info =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5: http://pastebin.com/vCWDbYwH
On 4/4/2011 8:07 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
MAKEOPTS=-j3
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:146362: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing
.cfi_endproc directive
xgcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1)
This kind of error is often caused by the parallel make not
On Monday 04 April 2011 10:17:34 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 21:56:47 Peter Humphrey wrote:
This is connected with the other thread I've written to today, about
using my workstation as an emerge server. A complication I didn't
mention there is that both make.conf and
Pandu Poluan pandu at poluan.info writes:
Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
www.JFFNMS.org
Being written in PHP, JFFNMS can be customized to suit
different pieces of equipment. Basically if the device
has something interesting to monitor via SNMP either a
state
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
software raid system, with BTRFS.
I just want to make sure you know that BTRFS is experimental and
not intended yet for use on production machines. Otherwise, have
Yea...
EXT4 or BTRFS
thats the decision.
Most of the docs look dated...
James
Mark Knecht markknecht at gmail.com writes:
Depending on what you are putting onto your RAID watch carefully
what choices you make for SuperBlock type as well as being aware of
possible md name changes between the install environment and your
first real boot.
Nice to know.
(I think I'm
Mark Shields laebshade at gmail.com writes:
The last guide recommends using raid0 on some
partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing
but raid1 partitions. I'd rather have the full
raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0.
Well Raid 1 only would be keen.
Even swap as raid 1 ?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:14 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Mark Knecht markknecht at gmail.com writes:
Depending on what you are putting onto your RAID watch carefully
what choices you make for SuperBlock type as well as being aware of
possible md name changes between the
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Mark Shields laebshade at gmail.com writes:
The last guide recommends using raid0 on some
partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing
but raid1 partitions. I'd rather have the full
raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed
Hello again list,
Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
/usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown -R
portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
TIA
--
Rgds
Peter
I'm a long-time Cherokee user that is switching to Apache due to a
nasty Cherokee bug that I can't seem to work around.
I've configured Apache many times (albeit a long time ago), and can't
seem to figure out what's going on here.
I have a simple PHP app running that lives in some directory, say
It's also worth noting that I have *no* /usr/htdocs line in any of
my configuration file(s).
-james
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22, James j...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I'm a long-time Cherokee user that is switching to Apache due to a
nasty Cherokee bug that I can't seem to work around.
I've
Based on the symptoms, i.e., works from CLI but fails during boot, I
suspect a problem with privileges/attributes. What UID is Apache
running as?
Anyways, what's wrong with Cherokee? I really like to know because I
am currently considering deploying Cherokee.
Rgds,
On 2011-04-04, James
Hi Pandu,
Thanks for the response. What kind of permissions / privileges issues
would cause this sort of behavior.
~ % ps aux | grep -i apache
root 2421 1.1 0.3 224928 12312 ?Ss 09:53 0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -D DEFAULT_VHOST -D INFO -D SSL -D SSL_DEFAULT_VHOST
-D LANGUAGE -D
Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello again list,
Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
/usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown -R
portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
TIA
This is mine:
drwxr-xr-x 163 root
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:22 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello again list,
Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
/usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown
-R
portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
trying to do something fancier than just serving out tarballs?
Yes; I want it to mirror my portage tree and serve it to other boxes on the
LAN.
It used to do this
You have 2 process hidden for readdir command
You have 3 process hidden for ps command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
The tty of the following user process(es) were not found
in /var/run/utmp !
! RUID PID TTYCMD
however, rkhunter shows:
Heroin LKM
On Monday 04 April 2011 14:44:37 James wrote:
Pandu Poluan pandu at poluan.info writes:
Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
www.JFFNMS.org
Being written in PHP, JFFNMS can be customized to suit
different pieces of equipment. Basically if the device
has something
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
You have 2 process hidden for readdir command
You have 3 process hidden for ps command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
I don't get this message when I run it, but looking at the source code
it looks
28 matches
Mail list logo
