On 12/4/2011, at 5:49am, Carlos Sura wrote:
...
When I try to run LibreOffice as normal user, I can see the splash (of
libreoffice) but nothing more... Cannot use any libreoffice application, it
just don't work, fas as I can see is the libreoffice splash. No errors (as
normal user), after
On 12 April 2011 00:00, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 12/4/2011, at 5:49am, Carlos Sura wrote:
...
When I try to run LibreOffice as normal user, I can see the splash (of
libreoffice) but nothing more... Cannot use any libreoffice application, it
just don't work, fas as
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
On 04/06/2011 07:45 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
When I run qemu -no-kvm things work as expected under hardened kernel.
Using regular kernel (none hardened) qemu works ok.
So, the problem is running qemu under hardened
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:49:24 -0600, Carlos Sura wrote:
When I try to run LibreOffice as normal user, I can see the splash (of
libreoffice) but nothing more... Cannot use any libreoffice
application, it just don't work, fas as I can see is the libreoffice
splash. No errors (as normal user),
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:09:17 -0500, Mark Shields wrote:
If /boot is on a separate partition, you should be using
find /grub/stage1
If the symlink is there for boot - /boot -- and it is by default --
both work.
I've found GRUB's handling of symlinks to be variable at best. Try
searching
110412 Carlos Sura wrote:
On 12 April 2011 00:00, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Is this when you click on the libreoffice icon, or are you opening
terminal window and running `/path/to/bin/libreoffice`?
The latter should (hopefully) output some error messages.
I agree : make
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
James, if I'm not wrong (legacy) sys-boot/grub-0.97-r10
does not have drivers for ext4. Not sure if there's
a patch for it, or if grub2 can boot from ext4.
Mick, that's what I was wondering.
No evidence either way, that I could find
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
If /boot is on a separate partition, you should be using
It is.
find /grub/stage1
grub find /grub/stage1
Error 15: File not found
grub find /boot/grub/stage1
Error 15: File not found
If the symlink is there for boot - /boot -- and it is by
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
rarely, the likelihood of a power failure when you're
doing so is minuscule).
Yea,
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
Strollerstrollerat stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
rarely, the likelihood of a power failure when you're
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 09:57:26 Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
Strollerstrollerat stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
rarely, the
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:57:26 Dale wrote:
As for making things the same, that my not always be a good idea
either.
I might add a quotation from Ralph Waldo Emerson: a foolish preoccupation with
consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
--
Rgds
Peter
Hello list,
I've a weird one here. I'm rebuilding my local server on an Atom N270 box and
I've reached the point of installing phpmyadmin on it to manage a MySQL
database
I'm developing.
Three different browsers have no trouble displaying table structures, data, the
database design and the
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
I've found GRUB's handling of symlinks to be variable at best. Try
searching for the real file.
All the files are in /boot/grub:
(chroot) slam grub # ls
defaultgrub.conf minix_stage1_5 stage2.old
device.map grub.conf.bak
Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
next boot?
- Grant
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
If you know it's going to run, then you can do one of two things:
1) I believe
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, BRM wrote:
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
That misses the point.
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
That misses the point. I have rebooted sometimes just for a quick
change,
- Original Message
From: Grant emailgr...@gmail.com
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things
don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things
don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
That misses the point. I have rebooted sometimes just for a quick
- Original Message
From: Grant emailgr...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 3:29:35 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can a forced volume check be interrupted?
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
file
system
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
next boot?
Not once it has started, but there are some ways to avoid it running
in the first
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's an ext[123] you can use tune2fs -i 0 to set the auto-check
interval to never.
oops, I of course meant 234 not 123 :)
Hi all,
For my home network I am generally using wireless to get connected to the
network and the internet.
However for copying some large files I use the wire.
That means I get 2 IPs in the same range.
And both interfaces get the same metric : 0.
I found out I can modify the metric for the
Paul Hartman:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Paul Hartman
If it's an ext[123] you can use tune2fs -i 0 to set the auto-check
interval to never.
oops, I of course meant 234 not 123 :)
;)
But i prefer setting the interval to 1000 with 'tune2fs -c'.
| It is strongly recommended that
On 12 April 2011 04:09, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
110412 Carlos Sura wrote:
On 12 April 2011 00:00, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Is this when you click on the libreoffice icon, or are you opening
terminal window and running `/path/to/bin/libreoffice`?
The
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
next boot?
Not once it has started,
As I try to run as (normal) user -terminal-, does not show me any output, no
errors, no message.
What happens when you run X as the root user? Do you get the same
error? That is, log into a regular system terminal, start X, and run
LO.
28 matches
Mail list logo
