On Saturday 21 January 2012, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/20/2012 09:42 PM, Grant wrote:
# emerge -avDuN system
[snip]
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-auth/pambase-20081028
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
your request:
-
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:57:31 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
As the system starts to boot-up, it switches like it is going to start
X - changing a video mode somehow. I don't have xdm in the runlevels
yet, so it can't be starting XDM at all.This seems to happen right
after udevd is started, while it
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:00:52 -0600
»Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:06:22 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
I suspect this is
specific to the KDE ebuilds (or eclass). changed-use should only
skip an ebuild with changed flags if re-emerging would produce
On 21 January 2012 04:48, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
# emerge -avDuN system
[snip]
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-auth/pambase-20081028 have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r1 (masked by:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-01-19, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you really want that much broadcast and wide multicast (think
DNS-SD and NTP in multicast mode) traffic on the same Ethernet
segment?
That bit I don't
# emerge -avDuN system
[snip]
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-auth/pambase-20081028 have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r1 (masked by: EAPI 4)
- sys-auth/pambase-20101024 (masked by: EAPI 3)
On 01/20/2012 11:48 PM, Grant wrote:
You don't have to do the entire stage3 at once,
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/
has precompiled packages for the major arches and profiles. You could try to
replace just pambase, pam, python, etc. -- whatever's giving you trouble.
This was not my first
# emerge -avDuN system
[snip]
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-auth/pambase-20081028 have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r1 (masked by: EAPI 4)
- sys-auth/pambase-20101024 (masked by: EAPI 3)
If its not being used and outage is not a problem, I would recommend
reinstalling. I'm against doying it, but 2 years is a lot, if you have
any servers (MySQL, PHP) it would be an issue, you'll have MAJOR
changes to X, OpenRC and I'm not even talking about the kernel, udev,
etc.
I would back it
On Jan 20, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:45:08AM -0600, Chris Frederick wrote
If you still want private addresses, IPv6 has unique local addresses
(fc00::/7 range, http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ has a reg form to
help assign a /48
On 20 January 2012, at 23:58, Grant wrote:
OK, so the install is old and portage has dependencies, right?
emerge -pvDuN portage
will get you closer. However this is probably best covered using
Neil's suggestion of
emerge -pvDuN @system
I can't even get started:
# emerge -avDuN
On 1/21/2012 01:56 PM, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
If its not being used and outage is not a problem, I would recommend
reinstalling. I'm against doying it, but 2 years is a lot, if you have
any servers (MySQL, PHP) it would be an issue, you'll have MAJOR
changes to X, OpenRC and I'm not even
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:57:32 -0800, Grant wrote:
If your currently installed version of python reported by python -V
is less than 2.6 then you must choose a version of portage that is
compatible with it. If you have at least python 2.6 then use
portage-2.1.10.41.tar.bz2. If you have python
If your currently installed version of python reported by python -V
is less than 2.6 then you must choose a version of portage that is
compatible with it. If you have at least python 2.6 then use
portage-2.1.10.41.tar.bz2. If you have python 2.4 or 2.5 then use
portage-2.1.6.tar.bz2.
I get:
On 21 January 2012 03:26, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:00:52 -0600
»Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:06:22 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
I suspect this is
specific to the KDE ebuilds (or eclass). changed-use should
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:45:25 -0800
Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
But is this not a case where the kde eclass *explictly* set the USE
flag off? (Disclaimer: haven't read the eclass). In that case
portage would not know what to do when the flag goes away so the
behaviour we
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:26:45 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
--changed-use is intended for cases like a flag you are not using at
all goes away. Caveat: Even then it could still break in subtle ways
with dodgy ebuilds. Caveat emptor.
Thanks for the points you've made about
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:51:01 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it was a bug and Zac is fixing it. Sometimes when people
complain, it is because something is not working as it should.
I never saw Hilco as complaining, just questioning. And in the
post you quoted (and which I've
»Q« wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:51:01 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it was a bug and Zac is fixing it. Sometimes when people
complain, it is because something is not working as it should.
I never saw Hilco as complaining, just questioning. And in the
post you quoted (and
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:23:18PM -0600, ??Q?? wrote
Thanks for the points you've made about how removal of a flag a user
doesn't have enabled could still affect the user. I think I'll still
use --changed-use routinely and also periodically run an update with
--newuse.
What's the longest
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:34:52 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:23:18PM -0600, ??Q?? wrote
Thanks for the points you've made about how removal of a flag a user
doesn't have enabled could still affect the user. I think I'll
still use --changed-use
I think it comes down to a question of whether you're running a few
machines at home or small office, versus a large multinational outfit
with tens of thousands of machines.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 09:27:29AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
Thinking about it, in your device's case, I suspect you
»Q« wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:34:52 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:23:18PM -0600, ??Q?? wrote
Thanks for the points you've made about how removal of a flag a user
doesn't have enabled could still affect the user. I think I'll
still use
23 matches
Mail list logo
