The 05/09/12, Dale wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:52:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>
> > I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
> > work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few ti
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:54:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
> > work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
> > difference in compile times is just not there.
> Probably because with 16GB everything s
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:46:59 Dale wrote:
> So, I find it funny that they make a tool that really isn't needed very
> much. :/
Call it belt-and-braces if you like. (That's UK braces, which I think
are US suspenders.)
--
Rgds
Peter
Am 05.09.2012 20:18, schrieb "Roland Häder":
>> dracut and genkernel will both set up initrd.
> Okay, thank you. :)
>
> Now I hang with this:
>
> ---
Emerging (1 of 203)
dev-db/oracle-instantclient-basic-10.2.0.3-r1
> * Fetching files in the back
Hi all,
I finally got libxml2 compiled, first I had to do this:
# emerge expat
# emerge python
# cd /usr/portage/dev-lang/python/
# emerge python-2.7.3-r2.ebuild
# cd -
This makes sure that libexpat is there. Now the package is still not compiling
because of a missing .so file, see this:
# cd
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> I have to say that here, it is not a whole lot of fragmentation but it
>>> does seem a bit faster afterwards. I guess it depends on what is
>>> fragmented and such. I sometim
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> I have to say that here, it is not a whole lot of fragmentation but it
>> does seem a bit faster afterwards. I guess it depends on what is
>> fragmented and such. I sometimes wonder if it defrags itself. Even
>> when I watc
I just noticed that Kleopatra segfaults. Before I start rebuilding blindly,
this is what it shows on the terminal:
==
$ kleopatra
Statup timing: 0 ms elapsed: Command line args created
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:02:01 Dale wrote:
>>
>>> I find that after a big update, like KDE, it helps to defrag /usr.
>> Interesting. I've just run sudo e4defrag -c /usr and got a fragmentation
>> of zero. That's after
> dracut and genkernel will both set up initrd.
Okay, thank you. :)
Now I hang with this:
---
>>> Emerging (1 of 203) dev-db/oracle-instantclient-basic-10.2.0.3-r1
* Fetching files in the background. To view fetch progress, run
* `tail -f /var/log/emerge-
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:02:01 Dale wrote:
>
>> I find that after a big update, like KDE, it helps to defrag /usr.
> Interesting. I've just run sudo e4defrag -c /usr and got a fragmentation
> of zero. That's after upgrading KDE last week.
>
> Then I ran it on all t
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:52:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
> work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
> difference in compil
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:30:24 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > man mount explains it all, but the option you want is size, which
> > defaults to 50%. I use 80% which is what gives the somewhat odd size
> > of 13GB. This is based on physical RAM, but tmpfs will use swap if
> > there is not eno
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012, 09:23:58 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:42:56 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is :
> > 'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0'
> >
> > This doesn't seem to limit the size in a
> Last thing you need to do is pass the domdadm kernel parameter in your
> bootloader. With grub to you just edit /etc/default/grub
>
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="domdadm"
I meant grub2
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, "Roland Häder" wrote:
> To add my 2¢:
> All you need is build initram and pass it as a argument to pre configured
> kernel (with needed encryption and hash algorithms built in)
>
> Initram scripts are on github here
> https://github.com/tokiclover/mkinitramfs-ll
>
Am 05.09.2012 17:39, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> Hi,
>I'm sort of glazing over & falling asleep trying to understand the
> Gentoo genkernel Wiki page. This is not critical time-wise. I'm just
> curious about what genkernel could do in terms of creating a kernel &
> an initramfs for a root partition
To add my 2¢:All you need is build initram and pass it as a argument to pre configured kernel (with needed encryption and hash algorithms built in)
Initram scripts are on github here https://github.com/tokiclover/mkinitramfs-ll Can I also use dracut? Or won't it setup initrd? I I didn't setup LVM
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I'm sort of glazing over & falling asleep trying to understand the
> Gentoo genkernel Wiki page. This is not critical time-wise. I'm just
> curious about what genkernel could do in terms of creating a kernel &
> an initramfs for a root
Hi,
I'm sort of glazing over & falling asleep trying to understand the
Gentoo genkernel Wiki page. This is not critical time-wise. I'm just
curious about what genkernel could do in terms of creating a kernel &
an initramfs for a root partition on RAID > 1 and metadata > 0.9. I've
done this in th
Am 05.09.2012 14:55, schrieb Adam Carter:
>>> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages work
>>> directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the difference
>>> in compile times is just not there.
>>
>> Probably because with 16GB everything stays cached anyway.
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:52:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> >> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
>> >> work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
>> >> difference in compile times is just not the
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:52:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
> >> work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
> >> difference in compile times is just not there.
> > Probably because with 16GB everything stays cached
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:02:01 Dale wrote:
> I find that after a big update, like KDE, it helps to defrag /usr.
Interesting. I've just run sudo e4defrag -c /usr and got a fragmentation
of zero. That's after upgrading KDE last week.
Then I ran it on all the nine ext4 partitions here and
>> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages work
>> directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the difference
>> in compile times is just not there.
>
> Probably because with 16GB everything stays cached anyway.
Would it still be useful to use tmpfs if you wan
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:07:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages work
>> directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the difference
>> in compile times is just not there.
> Probably because with 16GB everythin
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:07:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages work
> directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the difference
> in compile times is just not there.
Probably because with 16GB everything stays cached anyway.
--
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:07:13 Dale wrote:
>
>> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
>> work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
>> difference in compile times is just not there.
> Yes, I'd forgotten that. I just
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:07:13 Dale wrote:
> I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages
> work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the
> difference in compile times is just not there.
Yes, I'd forgotten that. I just haven't got round to changing
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 10:02:49 Philip Webb wrote:
>> 120905 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:42:56 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is
> :
'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=17
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:56:27PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, I removed it but it seemed it was still there somewhere. I found
>> out a while back that sometimes a little applet whatyoumacallit can get
>> stuck behind another one. Yep, I actually seen that once a wh
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:56:27PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Well, I removed it but it seemed it was still there somewhere. I found
> out a while back that sometimes a little applet whatyoumacallit can get
> stuck behind another one. Yep, I actually seen that once a while back.
> I added a applet an
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ali Gholami wrote:
> .ssh/config: Bad configuration option: GSSAPIKeyExchange
That config option needs a separate patch which has been around for
ages but upstream OpenSSH maintainers are being an arse^H^H^H^H
uncooperative. Sadly, Gentoo decided not to ship it a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 05:02:49 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 'man mount' explains it all ...
>
> Well, it outlines it (smile).
:-)
I'll rephrase that:
'man mount' explains it all, for small values of all.
> > ... but the option you want is size, which defaults to 50 % .
>
> That looks ok :
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 10:02:49 Philip Webb wrote:
> 120905 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:42:56 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is
:
> >> 'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0'
> >>
> >> This doe
Hi everyone,
I have installed latest version of Kerberos Heimdal 5.1.2 with openssh version
5.9p1 but when I try to login to a remote host using ssh I get an error:
-
.ssh/config: Bad configuration option: GSSAPIKeyExchange
-
Any thoughts how to fix this error?
Thanks in advance!
Ali
120905 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:42:56 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is :
>> 'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0'
>> This doesn't seem to limit the size in any way.
> 'man mount' explains it all ...
W
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:42:56 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> What is the best line for /etc/fstab ? The only example I have is :
>
> 'tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0'
>
> This doesn't seem to limit the size in any way.
man mount explains it all, but the option you want is size, w
38 matches
Mail list logo
