Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.10.0 Freezed once click on something

2013-03-05 Thread Jackie

在 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:10:46 +0800,Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com 写道:.xsession-errorsHere is part of my ~/.xsession-errors file,not clear about what the really problem is and just cut the part seems to be not okya.Someone help?plasma-desktop(13714)/libakonadi Akonadi::AgentManagerPrivate::createDBusInterface: AgentManager failed to get a valid AgentManager DBus interface. Error is: 1 "org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner" "Could not get owner of name 'org.freedesktop.Akonadi.Control': no such name" plasma-desktop(13714)/libakonadi Akonadi::SessionPrivate::socketError: Socket error occurred: "QLocalSocket::connectToServer: Invalid name" plasma-desktop(13714)/libakonadi Akonadi::SessionPrivate::socketError: Socket error occurred: "QLocalSocket::connectToServer: Invalid name" plasma-desktop(13714)/kdecore (KConfigSkeleton) KCoreConfigSkeleton::writeConfig:plasma-desktop(13714)/kdecore (KConfigSkeleton) KCoreConfigSkeleton::writeConfig:QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'initConnection' is still in use, all queries will cease to work.grepHelper: File does not exists:  "/proc/asound/card1/pcm3p/info" grepHelper: File does not exists:  "/proc/asound/card1/pcm7p/info"plasma-desktop(13714)/plasma StatusNotifierItemSource::refreshCallback: DBusMenu disabled for this application"/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "Drive" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_222AB_R8E268EB501190" : property "Drive" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "DeviceNumber" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "Device" does not exist X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4  Major opcode: 54 (X_FreePixmap)  Resource id:  0x2a0013fX Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4  Major opcode: 54 (X_FreePixmap)  Resource id:  0x2a00136"/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_222AB_R8E268EB501190" : property "DeviceNumber" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_222AB_R8E268EB501190" : property "Device" does not exist [/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] KCrash: Application 'nepomukservicestub' crashing...KCrash: Attempting to start /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/drkonqi from kdeinitFontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.drkonqi(13809): Unable to find an internal debugger that can work with the KCrash backend [/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "Drive" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_222AB_R8E268EB501190" : property "Drive" does not exist[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "DeviceNumber" does not exist "/org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/WDC_WD10EADX_00TDHB0_WD_WCAV5R627509" : property "Device" does not existQObject: Cannot create children for a parent that is in a different thread.(Parent is Nepomuk2::ResourceManager(0x81afac0), parent's thread is QThread(0x808ddc8), current thread is QThread(0x81b2628)
-- 使用Opera的电子邮件客户端:http://www.opera.com/mail/

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone running ck-sources-3.7.10?

2013-03-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 05/03/13 01:14, walt wrote:

My mojo seems to be broken lately :(  I just updated a gentoo vbox guest
from ck-sources-3.6.11-r1 to 3.7.10 and I'm seeing file-system corruption
and a segfaulting NetworkManager during bootup.

I went back one snapshot and I'm going to try switching to gentoo-sources
on that same virtual machine.  It'll take me a while to get it updated again,
but meanwhile I thought I'd mention it here in case this really is as bad
as it seems to me ATM.


I was using 3.7.10 for a while.  But not ck-sources.  I was on 
gentoo-sources and had the BFS patch in /etc/portage/patches. 
ck-sources applies many more patches to the kernel, not just BFS, so try 
gentoo-sources and see if that's the problem.





Re: [gentoo-user] Programm for Floor Plans

2013-03-05 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
 Hello,


 know someone a program for draw floor plans? I has use normal Visio for
 it, but unter Linux?

If you're able to use a real CAD program, LibreCAD is good one. It's
not in portage but in the science overlay.



[gentoo-user] OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread James
Hello,

I purchased this ram from New Egg:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231529

G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866 (PC3 14900)
Desktop Memory Model F3-14900CL10Q-32GBZL

I've since found out it is for Intel.


I have an FX8350 processor with this mobo:
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard 


So will it damage the board, ram or processor?

I've nevered RMA anything to NewEgg. It's been
over 90 days since purchase, but less than 120.

Thoughts, scolding and recommendations are most warranted...

I have since found this ram:
G.SKILL Trident X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2400 (PC3 19200)
Desktop Memory Model F3-2400C10D-16GTX 

That looks perfect for (overclocked?) FX8350 based system?


TIA,
James






Re: [gentoo-user] OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread Andrew Hoffman
It wont harm your computer but the memory timings/voltages will may need to
be set manually. Plug it in and try it out. The only real different thing
between Intel Other memory is the spd information is for intel rather than
amd in the ram will not run at rated speed until you change
timings/voltages to match. Let us know if you have any problems. I'm sure
they can be worked out. Oh and update the bios.


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I purchased this ram from New Egg:

 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231529

 G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866 (PC3
 14900)
 Desktop Memory Model F3-14900CL10Q-32GBZL

 I've since found out it is for Intel.


 I have an FX8350 processor with this mobo:
 GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD
 Motherboard


 So will it damage the board, ram or processor?

 I've nevered RMA anything to NewEgg. It's been
 over 90 days since purchase, but less than 120.

 Thoughts, scolding and recommendations are most warranted...

 I have since found this ram:
 G.SKILL Trident X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2400 (PC3
 19200)
 Desktop Memory Model F3-2400C10D-16GTX

 That looks perfect for (overclocked?) FX8350 based system?


 TIA,
 James







Re: [gentoo-user] OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am 05.03.2013 18:22, schrieb James:
 Hello,

 I purchased this ram from New Egg:

 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231529

 G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866 (PC3 
 14900)
 Desktop Memory Model F3-14900CL10Q-32GBZL

 I've since found out it is for Intel.


 I have an FX8350 processor with this mobo:
 GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard 


 So will it damage the board, ram or processor?

 I've nevered RMA anything to NewEgg. It's been
 over 90 days since purchase, but less than 120.

 Thoughts, scolding and recommendations are most warranted...

 I have since found this ram:
 G.SKILL Trident X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2400 (PC3 
 19200)
 Desktop Memory Model F3-2400C10D-16GTX 

 That looks perfect for (overclocked?) FX8350 based system?


 TIA,
 James





intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.



[gentoo-user] The new Gentoo user and the Kernel

2013-03-05 Thread Henson Sturgill
Hi!

I'm new to Gentoo, but really loving the amount of control it provides (I'm
guessing all Gentoo-users are control freaks?) During my initial install, I
forgot to enable tmpfs -- though it was clearly printed in the manual.

While looking for a solution, I saw countless forum posts from users with
the same problem. Which makes me wonder..

Why not patch the default config to have these items enabled?

Is it a legacy thing, a way to force users into reading documentation and
becoming more self sufficient, or are we just trying to stay true to the
upstream developers? Maybe something else?

Thanks!


Re: [gentoo-user] The new Gentoo user and the Kernel

2013-03-05 Thread Philip Webb
130305 Henson Sturgill wrote:
 I'm new to Gentoo,

Welcome ! -- you should find this list friendly  useful.

 ... but really loving the amount of control it provides
 I'm guessing all Gentoo-users are control freaks?

We tend to build our own machines -- this is a good source of info --
 like to have them do what we want, not some lowest common denominator,
but Gentoo is not about overclocking or neurotic fine-tuning.

 During my initial install, I forgot to enable tmpfs
 -- though it was clearly printed in the manual.

Yes, always follow the manual  if necessary go back  do it again.

 While looking for a solution, I saw countless forum posts
 from users with the same problem. Which makes me wonder.

The Forum cb useful occasionally, but the noise/signal is far too high :
it's the student cafeteria, whereas this is the staff common-room.

 Why not patch the default config to have these items enabled?

At this point, the answer is probably : Patch it yourself.
That's the Gentoo attitude : if you need advice how to, then ask here.

 Is it a way to force users into reading documentation
 and becoming more self sufficient,
 or are we just trying to stay true to upstream developers?

Probably partly both.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone running ck-sources-3.7.10? [SOLVED]

2013-03-05 Thread walt
On 03/04/2013 03:14 PM, walt wrote:
 My mojo seems to be broken lately :(  I just updated a gentoo vbox guest
 from ck-sources-3.6.11-r1 to 3.7.10 and I'm seeing file-system corruption
 and a segfaulting NetworkManager during bootup.

Heh.  My RAM is broken, not my mojo :)  Bless memtest86...




[gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread James
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:


 intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
 just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
 additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
 won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.




Nice to know about adjusting the timings/voltages.
Any suggested further docs or resources on this
is of keen interest to me. Maybe an example?

I never had to adjust timings/voltages before. Then again,
I need to poke around the Gigabyte BIOS
as these are my first Gigabyte mobos. Very advance 

Thanks to all responders. I'll give it a go and post
back if there is any further issues.

James






Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread Andrew Hoffman
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/bios-a-z,1200-11.html toms has good
guides on it.
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Understanding-RAM-Timings/26/1

Its really as easy as navigating the bios to the memory section and
changing the timing settings to manual mode. Then adjust to match the
setting for the ram. These numbers are your major timings you are concerned
with the others use either default values or automatic settings:
10-11-10-30 which break down to CAS 10, rRCD(RAS to CAS) 11, tRP 10, tRAS
30 your ram should also be 1T memory if you see a setting for it.
-Andy



On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:48 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:


  intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
  just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
  additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
  won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.




 Nice to know about adjusting the timings/voltages.
 Any suggested further docs or resources on this
 is of keen interest to me. Maybe an example?

 I never had to adjust timings/voltages before. Then again,
 I need to poke around the Gigabyte BIOS
 as these are my first Gigabyte mobos. Very advance

 Thanks to all responders. I'll give it a go and post
 back if there is any further issues.

 James







[gentoo-user] Re: The new Gentoo user and the Kernel

2013-03-05 Thread »Q«
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:31:35 -0500
Henson Sturgill henson.gen...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm new to Gentoo, but really loving the amount of control it
 provides (I'm guessing all Gentoo-users are control freaks?) During
 my initial install, I forgot to enable tmpfs -- though it was clearly
 printed in the manual.
 
 While looking for a solution, I saw countless forum posts from users
 with the same problem. Which makes me wonder..
 
 Why not patch the default config to have these items enabled?
 
 Is it a legacy thing, a way to force users into reading documentation
 and becoming more self sufficient, or are we just trying to stay true
 to the upstream developers? Maybe something else?

I'm not completely sure, but I believe it's just the config that comes
from upstream.  For Gentoo users who want a kernel automagically
configured, there's genkernel.

Welcome to Gentoo!  Have fun!  :)




[gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread walt
On 03/05/2013 09:56 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

 intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
 just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
 additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
 won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.

I just discovered some bad DDR2 RAM in an older machine (2GB x 2) and I
tested each stick separately using memtest86.  The result confuses me:

Each 2GB stick fails at exactly the same point in the test (0-32MB), and
that seems improbable to me.  I'm thinking the mobo might be broken instead
of the RAM.  Any ideas?

Thanks.  (I have only the one machine that uses DDR2, unfortunately.)






Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 05.03.2013 22:14, schrieb walt:
 On 03/05/2013 09:56 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 
 intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
 just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
 additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
 won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.
 
 I just discovered some bad DDR2 RAM in an older machine (2GB x 2) and I
 tested each stick separately using memtest86.  The result confuses me:
 
 Each 2GB stick fails at exactly the same point in the test (0-32MB), and
 that seems improbable to me.  I'm thinking the mobo might be broken instead
 of the RAM.  Any ideas?
 
 Thanks.  (I have only the one machine that uses DDR2, unfortunately.)
 

Try adjusting the timing as noted on this thread. Maybe slower settings
work better, even if they are below SPD. Also look at the voltages (most
BIOSes show them). If they are considerably off, this could affect your
RAM. A bad power supply is always a suspect when something breaks.

Regards,
Florian Philipp




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram?

2013-03-05 Thread Andrew Hoffman
Test them in a different slot each individually. if still fails install
both. swap back and forth.
-Andy


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.netwrote:

 Am 05.03.2013 22:14, schrieb walt:
  On 03/05/2013 09:56 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 
  intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work
  just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the
  additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there
  won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3.
 
  I just discovered some bad DDR2 RAM in an older machine (2GB x 2) and I
  tested each stick separately using memtest86.  The result confuses me:
 
  Each 2GB stick fails at exactly the same point in the test (0-32MB), and
  that seems improbable to me.  I'm thinking the mobo might be broken
 instead
  of the RAM.  Any ideas?
 
  Thanks.  (I have only the one machine that uses DDR2, unfortunately.)
 

 Try adjusting the timing as noted on this thread. Maybe slower settings
 work better, even if they are below SPD. Also look at the voltages (most
 BIOSes show them). If they are considerably off, this could affect your
 RAM. A bad power supply is always a suspect when something breaks.

 Regards,
 Florian Philipp





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: The new Gentoo user and the Kernel

2013-03-05 Thread David Abbott
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
 On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:31:35 -0500
 Henson Sturgill henson.gen...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm new to Gentoo, but really loving the amount of control it
 provides (I'm guessing all Gentoo-users are control freaks?) During
 my initial install, I forgot to enable tmpfs -- though it was clearly
 printed in the manual.

 While looking for a solution, I saw countless forum posts from users
 with the same problem. Which makes me wonder..

 Why not patch the default config to have these items enabled?

 Is it a legacy thing, a way to force users into reading documentation
 and becoming more self sufficient, or are we just trying to stay true
 to the upstream developers? Maybe something else?

 I'm not completely sure, but I believe it's just the config that comes
 from upstream.  For Gentoo users who want a kernel automagically
 configured, there's genkernel.

 Welcome to Gentoo!  Have fun!  :)



Many Gentooligans start with a kernel-seed :)
http://kernel-seeds.org/seeds/64_bit/gentoo/
http://kernel-seeds.org/working.html

Yes, have fun,
David



[gentoo-user] Multiple package instances within a single package slot

2013-03-05 Thread Valmor de Almeida
Hello,

I would appreciate help with this multiple-packages-in-a-single slot
problem. In the past I have unistalled packages and reinstalled on a
case-by-case basis and dealt with the fall out manually. I wonder
whether there is a more efficient way of doing it.

Thanks,

--
Valmor


- USE=libkms cups apng minizip hwdb emerge -vp --newuse --tree
--update --deep system

[snip]

[blocks B  ]  sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4
(sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
[blocks B  ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186 is blocking
sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-23)
[blocks B  ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 is
blocking sys-fs/udev-197-r8)

!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

x11-base/xorg-server:0

  (x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.4::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.99[-minimal] required by
(x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)
(and 1 more with the same problem)

  (x11-base/xorg-server-1.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
(no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)

virtual/udev:0

  (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
virtual/udev-196 required by (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.88::gentoo, installed)

  (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
=virtual/udev-197-r1 required by (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo,
ebuild scheduled for merge)
=virtual/udev-197-r1 required by
(sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
(and 11 more with the same problems)

sys-fs/udev:0

  (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?]
required by (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed)

  (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by

=sys-fs/udev-197-r8[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,kmod?,selinux?,static-libs?]
required by (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)

x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox:0

  (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.24::gentoo, ebuild scheduled
for merge) pulled in by
(no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)

  (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
~x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22 required by
(app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)



Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple package instances within a single package slot

2013-03-05 Thread Matt Joyce
On 05/03/13 23:21, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 Hello,

 I would appreciate help with this multiple-packages-in-a-single slot
 problem. In the past I have unistalled packages and reinstalled on a
 case-by-case basis and dealt with the fall out manually. I wonder
 whether there is a more efficient way of doing it.

 Thanks,

 --
 Valmor


 - USE=libkms cups apng minizip hwdb emerge -vp --newuse --tree
 --update --deep system

 [snip]

 [blocks B  ]  sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4
 (sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
 [blocks B  ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186 is blocking
 sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-23)
 [blocks B  ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 is
 blocking sys-fs/udev-197-r8)

 !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
 !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

 x11-base/xorg-server:0

   (x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.4::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.99[-minimal] required by
 (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)
 (and 1 more with the same problem)

   (x11-base/xorg-server-1.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in 
 by
 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)

 virtual/udev:0

   (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 virtual/udev-196 required by (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.88::gentoo, installed)

   (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
 =virtual/udev-197-r1 required by (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo,
 ebuild scheduled for merge)
 =virtual/udev-197-r1 required by
 (sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
 (and 11 more with the same problems)

 sys-fs/udev:0

   (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 ~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?]
 required by (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed)

   (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
 
 =sys-fs/udev-197-r8[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,kmod?,selinux?,static-libs?]
 required by (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)

 x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox:0

   (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.24::gentoo, ebuild scheduled
 for merge) pulled in by
 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)

   (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 ~x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22 required by
 (app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)

I'm fairly new to Gentoo so might not be the best to help here but from
my experience when two versions of one package are involved and it says
no parents arn't satisfied by others on several occasions specifying
that package explicitly on the command line has worked for me, I suspect
it might work in the other case here also as it's a virtual package
having an issue.  It seems to get more fun when two real packages
decide they want different and mutually incompatible versions of a
package then sometimes masking a specified version temporarily seems to
work for some I had one recently that simply didn't want to resolve
until I decided enough was enough and opted not to bother with the one
package triggering a dependency that it liked and half the rest of the
system didn't.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple package instances within a single package slot

2013-03-05 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:21:12PM -0500, Valmor de Almeida wrote
 Hello,
 
 I would appreciate help with this multiple-packages-in-a-single slot
 problem. In the past I have unistalled packages and reinstalled on a
 case-by-case basis and dealt with the fall out manually. I wonder
 whether there is a more efficient way of doing it.

  I had a similar problem during a recent installation when I converted
from udev to eudev.  emerge --update --newuse --deep world spewed out
those error messages.  However, emerge world (no options) ran OK.
Then I was able to unmerge udev and emerge eudev, the command...
emerge --update --newuse --deep world ran OK after that.  Reminds me
of the joke about insanity... doing the same thing and expecting a
different result.  In this case, I assume that emerge world resolved
some issues, and got the system back into a sane state.

  To repeat...
Step 1) emerge world
Step 2) emerge --update --newuse --deep world

-- 
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
I don't run desktop environments; I run useful applications



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone running ck-sources-3.7.10? [SOLVED]

2013-03-05 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Mar 6, 2013 2:34 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 03/04/2013 03:14 PM, walt wrote:
  My mojo seems to be broken lately :(  I just updated a gentoo vbox guest
  from ck-sources-3.6.11-r1 to 3.7.10 and I'm seeing file-system
corruption
  and a segfaulting NetworkManager during bootup.

 Heh.  My RAM is broken, not my mojo :)  Bless memtest86...



Haha. I remembered not being able to install Windows XP on a computer at my
prior workplace; it keeps complaining of bad media or something similar.
We had several Windows XP Installer CDs, none of them work.

Finally someone had the brilliant idea of inserting a memtest CD... and
whaddaya know... that PC had a faulty RAM! We swap out the faulty modules,
and all went well...

Rgds,
--


Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple package instances within a single package slot

2013-03-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 06/03/2013 01:21, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I would appreciate help with this multiple-packages-in-a-single slot
 problem. In the past I have unistalled packages and reinstalled on a
 case-by-case basis and dealt with the fall out manually. I wonder
 whether there is a more efficient way of doing it.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --
 Valmor
 
 
 - USE=libkms cups apng minizip hwdb emerge -vp --newuse --tree
 --update --deep system

  ^^

Don't do that, rather run it on world; or you could do emerge -pv
@system Modern portage versions deal with these blockers automatically,
but they need the whole dependency graph to do it. There's no much point
in trying to deal with system and world independently anyway, system
isn't something magical, it's nothing more than a minimum collection of
packages that Gentoo can still run on, a mere list.

-ND to rebuild system doesn't get you anything extra and usually wants
to evaluate half of world as well (usually due to USE=X)

You update system if you want to guarantee yourself a consistent
toolchain after a gcc or glibc update, or just prior to emerge -e world



 
 [snip]
 
 [blocks B  ]  sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4
 (sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
 [blocks B  ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186 is blocking
 sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-23)
 [blocks B  ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 is
 blocking sys-fs/udev-197-r8)
 
 !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
 !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
 
 x11-base/xorg-server:0
 
   (x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.4::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 x11-base/xorg-server-1.12.99[-minimal] required by
 (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)
 (and 1 more with the same problem)
 
   (x11-base/xorg-server-1.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in 
 by
 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
 
 virtual/udev:0
 
   (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 virtual/udev-196 required by (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.88::gentoo, installed)
 
   (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
 =virtual/udev-197-r1 required by (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo,
 ebuild scheduled for merge)
 =virtual/udev-197-r1 required by
 (sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
 (and 11 more with the same problems)
 
 sys-fs/udev:0
 
   (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 ~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?]
 required by (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, installed)
 
   (sys-fs/udev-197-r8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
 
 =sys-fs/udev-197-r8[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,kmod?,selinux?,static-libs?]
 required by (virtual/udev-197-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
 
 x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox:0
 
   (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.24::gentoo, ebuild scheduled
 for merge) pulled in by
 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
 
   (x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 ~x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-4.1.22 required by
 (app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-4.1.22::gentoo, installed)
 


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com