On 07/06/13 02:21, Dale wrote:
William Kenworthy wrote:
On 06/07/13 04:12, Dale wrote:
I had a interesting adventure the other day. A friend of mine's son is
getting ready to go to college. Budget is tight so we went to find a
used laptop for him. I went into the local puter shop and the
On 06/07/2013 00:21, Dale wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out what he thought he would accomplish tho.
I can't get my head wrapped around that yet.
That's easy to answer.
The fellow probably doesn't know much.
If you want a brilliant example, just go read a wide bunch of threads on
the
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:55:36 -0600, Joseph wrote:
What was confusing to me is the fact that I logged into the system via
ssh to my account and su to use who was in group games but for some
reason or another the games would not execute.
su gives you the rights of the user but it not the same as
On Friday 05 Jul 2013 22:46:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
... but the person sitting at the keyboard is usually capable of screwing
it up more than any virus. :)
Hah! Tell me about it. :-(
--
Peter
On Saturday 06 Jul 2013 07:57:38 the wrote:
On 07/06/13 02:21, Dale wrote:
William Kenworthy wrote:
On 06/07/13 04:12, Dale wrote:
While we was
chatting, he said that Linux is just as prone to getting a virus as
windoze and so is a Mac. I think my laughing let him know I wasn't
On Jul 6, 2013 11:13 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Friday 05 Jul 2013 22:46:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
... but the person sitting at the keyboard is usually capable of
screwing
it up more than any virus. :)
Hah! Tell me about it. :-(
--
Peter
What I did recently:
I was present for a discussion about which is the most secure OS. I don't
remember the forum but the consensus was that the most secure OS is the one
you know. Anyone can wreck a system but not everyone has the ability to
maintain a system.
I'm not arguing that you can run Windows as tight as
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:50:40AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Technically, he's not wrong - any OS is just as susceptible to viruses
as any other, you just have to get over the first hurdle which is
getting code to run. The overall design of Windows has historically made
this somewhat easy,
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:12:27AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday 05 Jul 2013 22:46:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
... but the person sitting at the keyboard is usually capable of screwing
it up more than any virus. :)
Hah! Tell me about it. :-(
Ack
--
Happy Penguin Computers
On 03/14/2012 08:11 AM, Robert David wrote:
V Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:24:47 -0500
Michael Sullivan msulli1...@gmail.com napsáno:
I feel really stupid asking this, but I want to use an HDMI component
to output one of my PCs to the TV set. I've followed all of the wiki
entry at
On 07/06/2013 01:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/14/2012 08:11 AM, Robert David wrote:
V Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:24:47 -0500
Michael Sullivan msulli1...@gmail.com napsáno:
I feel really stupid asking this, but I want to use an HDMI component
to output one of my PCs to the TV set. I've followed
on 07/06/2013 12:03 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
su username -
I think that sould be:
su - username
Hi there,
I just burned all my pictures from my last vacation on a blueray-disk using
k3b, and for no apparent reason it stoped at 99.8% and complained an error
(I/O error). I checked the logs (see attached file), but could not find a hint.
I compared each and every file on the disk with its
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:20:12 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
su username -
I think that sould be:
su - username
You're right. su is incredibly picky about the location of - on the
command line, which is why I prefer to use -l.
--
Neil Bothwick
Someone who thinks logically is a nice contrast
Alexander Puchmayr alexander.puchm...@linznet.at wrote:
Hi there,
I just burned all my pictures from my last vacation on a blueray-disk using
k3b, and for no apparent reason it stoped at 99.8% and complained an error
(I/O error). I checked the logs (see attached file), but could not find a
15 matches
Mail list logo
