On Saturday 27 July 2013 01:12:59 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Anyone seen that ...
>
> http://www.gentoogroup.com/for-customers/
>
> ;-)
You'll expect customers that build their projects themselves.
Hello,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:48:33 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> in /var/db/pkg you will find a copy of the ebuild for the current
> *installed* version - 4.1.0.2.
> Copy that to a local overlay and mask all versions smaller and greater
> than that in package.mask.
> Portage will then keep the c
On 07/25/2013 06:10 PM, walt wrote:
> I'm very happy that I did the gnome update on a virtual gentoo
> machine instead of my real machine :) The virtual gentoo is
> unusable at the moment because gnome is very sick indeed.
Two things changed today to help fix the problems: more gnome
package upd
On Fri, Jul 26 2013, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:39:13AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>
>> On 26/07/13 22:13, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 26 2013, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
As others pointed out, you now need to:
source /usr/share/bash-compl
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:46:21 -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > You probably forgot to re-emerge all packages that provide bash
> > completion files:
> >
> >emerge -av1 \$(qfile -q -S -C /usr/share/bash-completion)
>
> little syntax help:
>
> emerge -av1 $(qfile -q -S -C /usr/share/bash-comple
On 27/07/13 00:12, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Anyone seen that ...
>
> http://www.gentoogroup.com/for-customers/
>
> ;-)
>
> Stefan
>
I have actually had a picture of their actual office banner sent to me
few months ago by another Gentoo user!
--
Mateusz K.
0x2ADA9A97.asc
Description:
Anyone seen that ...
http://www.gentoogroup.com/for-customers/
;-)
Stefan
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:16:57AM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> when use the follow entry, is the same, downgrade.
> gentoomobile siefke # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
> >=app-office/libreoffice-4.1.0.2
> >=app-office/libreoffice-l10n-4.1.0.2
>
> Ideas?
Yes, what you have above means "mas
On 27/07/2013 00:43, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 27/07/2013 00:16, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:43:43 +0100 Mick
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You could mask any versions greater than >4.1.0.2 and lesser than
>>> <4.1.0.2 I guess, but instead you may want to give
>>> app-office/lib
On 27/07/2013 00:16, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:43:43 +0100 Mick
> wrote:
>
>> You could mask any versions greater than >4.1.0.2 and lesser than
>> <4.1.0.2 I guess, but instead you may want to give
>> app-office/libreoffice-bin a spin which will save significant ti
On 27/07/13 06:19, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hey Armin,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:01:04 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>> ok, first make an overlay and copy the ebuild of the version you want
>> to pin there.
>>
>> Than mask everything else.
>>
>> You can find the ebuild in /var/db if it wa
Am 27.07.2013 00:08, schrieb Mick:
> On Friday 26 Jul 2013 21:13:53 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> anyway, I will try to rebuild ccache maybe ...
>
> Or not use ccache at all? Some emerges break with ccache set up.
Sure. I disabled it first, re-emerged it later and for now it is off.
Just som
Hey Armin,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:01:04 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> ok, first make an overlay and copy the ebuild of the version you want
> to pin there.
>
> Than mask everything else.
>
> You can find the ebuild in /var/db if it was removed from the tree
> already.
>
> And yes, this
Hello,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:43:43 +0100 Mick
wrote:
> You could mask any versions greater than >4.1.0.2 and lesser than
> <4.1.0.2 I guess, but instead you may want to give
> app-office/libreoffice-bin a spin which will save significant time
> when you need to update/downgrade this package.
I
On Friday 26 Jul 2013 21:13:53 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 22:08, schrieb Yohan Pereira:
> > Try compiling a simple hello world program in C and see if the compiler
> > output gives you any more information.
>
> thanks for the suggestion ... I may have found the problem already ...
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:39:13AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> You probably forgot to re-emerge all packages that provide bash
> completion files:
>
>emerge -av1 \$(qfile -q -S -C /usr/share/bash-completion)
little syntax help:
emerge -av1 $(qfile -q -S -C /usr/share/bash-completio
On 26/07/13 22:13, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26 2013, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 24/07/13 15:06, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
As of bash-completion-2.1-r1 it appears the eselect module is gone and
the use of /etc/bash-completion.d is dead. Does this mean that all
completions are enabled
ok, first make an overlay and copy the ebuild of the version you want to
pin there.
Than mask everything else.
You can find the ebuild in /var/db if it was removed from the tree already.
And yes, this ebuild removing sucks - because nobody needs every single LO
update...
2013/7/26 Silvio Sief
Am 26.07.2013 22:08, schrieb Yohan Pereira:
> Try compiling a simple hello world program in C and see if the compiler output
> gives you any more information.
thanks for the suggestion ... I may have found the problem already ...
something around "ccache" ... if I remove it from $FEATURES the bui
Am 21.07.2013 16:42, schrieb Peter Wilmott:
> On 21/07/13 15:31, luis jure wrote:
>> OK, now i have my system successfully installed and running on my new
>> SSD.
>> now i have to decide what to do with the rest of the disk (it's a 256MB
>> samsung).
>>
>> the first big question is: what about swap
On 26/07/13 at 10:01pm, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 21:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>
> > Should I quickpkg a gcc from my thinkpad and transfer?
>
> hmm, not really. Found that I had created a binary package on my machine
> anyway and re-installed that. Doesn't help.
>
>
Am 26.07.2013 21:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Should I quickpkg a gcc from my thinkpad and transfer?
hmm, not really. Found that I had created a binary package on my machine
anyway and re-installed that. Doesn't help.
S
Am 22.07.2013 23:35, schrieb FredL:
>>
>> Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
>>
>>
>> no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
>> packages installed . I have checked at the init script and find a line
>> in the depend section saying :
>>
>> after lo lo0
Something broke my setup today ... right now I can't emerge anything as
I always get
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
in a way or another ...
both my choices of
# gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.6.4 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3
bring the same issues.
Should
On Friday 26 Jul 2013 19:33:52 Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have installed Libreoffice 4.1.0.2 and now is update to Version 4.1.0.4
> available.
>
> Is there a way to stop these updates? i has try with portage.mask, but then
> come a downgrade to Version 4.0.4.2. Its enough when update to
On Fri, Jul 26 2013, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 24/07/13 15:06, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
>> As of bash-completion-2.1-r1 it appears the eselect module is gone and
>> the use of /etc/bash-completion.d is dead. Does this mean that all
>> completions are enabled globally by default now? It used to
Hello,
i have installed Libreoffice 4.1.0.2 and now is update to Version 4.1.0.4
available.
Is there a way to stop these updates? i has try with portage.mask, but then
come a downgrade to Version 4.0.4.2. Its enough when update to bigger Updates
for example 4.2. Each update is not required for
On 24/07/13 15:06, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
As of bash-completion-2.1-r1 it appears the eselect module is gone and
the use of /etc/bash-completion.d is dead. Does this mean that all
completions are enabled globally by default now? It used to be that you
could turn each individual one on/off either
On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't stress about it too much, your choice is do you want to use
>>> Gnome3 or not? And then just use whatever Gnome3 gives as *that* part
>>> you
* walt [130725 21:12]:
> I'm very happy that I did the gnome update on a virtual gentoo
> machine instead of my real machine :) The virtual gentoo is
> unusable at the moment because gnome is very sick indeed.
>
> I avoided the big update on my real machine when I saw that
> gnome-shell (I think
Am 26.07.2013 03:10, schrieb walt:
> I'm very happy that I did the gnome update on a virtual gentoo
> machine instead of my real machine :) The virtual gentoo is
> unusable at the moment because gnome is very sick indeed.
>
> I avoided the big update on my real machine when I saw that
> gnome-she
Thanks for the heads-up.
Am 2013-07-26 11:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.07.2013 17:42, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
I use the following unit in one of my servers:
#
-
Hi All,
What do you think about it?
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/adapteva/parallella-a-supercomputer-for-everyone/posts/547314
Would it be possible to put Gentoo on it? Worth it purchase one to
play at home? I do not do any extreme stuff, I develop java and I
always wanted to try out the
Am 25.07.2013 17:42, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
>
> I use the following unit in one of my servers:
>
> #
> ---
> [Unit]
My current version,
On 25 July 2013 22:31, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, András Csányi wrote:
>> Hi All,
[snip]
> Unity is in the tree? Where?
In the unity-gentoo overlay. At the moment the overlay packages are
clashing the already unmasked gnome-3.8. It requires a little job to
ma
36 matches
Mail list logo
