[gentoo-user] ebuild for canon ufr ii lt driver . Anyone got it ?

2014-04-09 Thread Håkon Alstadheim
Canon just came out with a driver for my printer i-Sensys lbp 7100cn (yay!) . It was promised september 2013 (grumble). It is downloadable from here : http://www.canon.no/Support/Consumer_Products/products/printers/Laser/i-SENSYS_LBP7100Cn.aspx . I could not for the life of me create a scraper

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Snort handbook is out of date

2014-04-09 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 08 Apr 2014 18:25:34 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:25:31 +0100 Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: I just wanted to save some time and confusion for anyone wanting to dip a toe into the muddy snort waters. You can file a bug to have the page update or be

[gentoo-user] sci-mathematics/glpk-4.45 patch fails

2014-04-09 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello. When I try to merge sci-mathematics/glpk-4.45: [ebuild R] sci-mathematics/glpk-4.45 USE=-doc -examples -gmp - -mysql -odbc -static-libs 0 kB I get the following error: * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is: *

Re: [gentoo-user] sci-mathematics/glpk-4.45 patch fails

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
This is a bug. Please file one at bugs.gentoo.org. The patch which is missing got removed with the latest version bump of glpk but it is still referred to from the ebuild of version 4.45. -- Regards Daniel

Re: [gentoo-user] sci-mathematics/glpk-4.45 patch fails

2014-04-09 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/09/14 14:50, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: This is a bug. Please file one at bugs.gentoo.org http://bugs.gentoo.org. The patch which is missing got removed with the latest version bump of glpk but it is still referred to from the ebuild of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-networkd: simpler config for my network

2014-04-09 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 08.04.2014 07:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: I just looked up what systemd-networkd and virt-manager do. No tap-devices here when I run a local VM ... so I might review the openrc-script for reference. edited and tested the bridge.service:

[gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Crawford
Hello everyone, I am attempting to remove the default 'gentoo' repository definition from my list of repositories. Even though I am using a custom repos.conf in /etc/portage, I see that portage is including the default 'gentoo' entry from /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf. Is there any way I

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

2014-04-09 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:42:42 -0700 Alex Crawford alex.crawf...@coreos.com wrote: I am attempting to remove the default 'gentoo' repository definition from my list of repositories. Even though I am using a custom repos.conf in /etc/portage, I see that portage is including the default 'gentoo'

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

2014-04-09 Thread Alex Crawford
Thanks for the suggestions. I'd rather not modify /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf if I can help it and /usr/portage is completely empty in my installation. I've been toying around with adding a 'deleted' attribute to the repository section. I'll start a discussion in the portage dev channel.

[gentoo-user] Question about binary packages

2014-04-09 Thread Jean-Christophe Bach
Hi list, I was wondering how it works for binary packages when they are compiled: Are all binary packages compiled on Gentoo infrastructure after a source upload from the maintainer, or are there any binary packages compiled on maintainers computers and then uploaded on Gentoo infra? In fact,

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for canon ufr ii lt driver . Anyone got it ?

2014-04-09 Thread walt
On 04/08/2014 11:20 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote: Canon just came out with a driver for my printer i-Sensys lbp 7100cn (yay!) . It was promised september 2013 (grumble). It is downloadable from here : http://www.canon.no/Support/Consumer_Products/products/printers/Laser/i-SENSYS_LBP7100Cn.aspx

Re: [gentoo-user] Question about binary packages

2014-04-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/09/2014 06:51 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: Hi list, I was wondering how it works for binary packages when they are compiled: Are all binary packages compiled on Gentoo infrastructure after a source upload from the maintainer, or are there any binary packages compiled on

[gentoo-user] 'Heartbleed' bug

2014-04-09 Thread Joseph
Is gentoo effected by this new 'Heartbleed' bug? The Heartbleed Bug is a serious vulnerability in the popular OpenSSL cryptographic software library http://heartbleed.com/ -- Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Heartbleed' bug

2014-04-09 Thread Ralf
Hello Joseph, On 04/10/2014 02:06 AM, Joseph wrote: Is gentoo effected by this new 'Heartbleed' bug? yes it is, as all OpenSSL versions 0.9.8 were affected. And Gentoo supported those versions. So Gentoo also was affected but it supports the new heartbleed-bug-fixed version 1.0.1g. I *think*

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Heartbleed' bug

2014-04-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/09/2014 08:06 PM, Joseph wrote: Is gentoo effected by this new 'Heartbleed' bug? The Heartbleed Bug is a serious vulnerability in the popular OpenSSL cryptographic software library http://heartbleed.com/ Yes, upgrade your OpenSSL to the latest stable version, and if 1.0.1g

Re: [gentoo-user] Question about binary packages

2014-04-09 Thread Dragostin Yanev
Hi list, I was wondering how it works for binary packages when they are compiled: Are all binary packages compiled on Gentoo infrastructure after a source upload from the maintainer, or are there any binary packages compiled on maintainers computers and then uploaded on Gentoo infra?

Re: [gentoo-user] 'Heartbleed' bug

2014-04-09 Thread Pavel Volkov
On Thursday, 10 April 2014 04:32:34 MSK, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Yes, upgrade your OpenSSL to the latest stable version, and if 1.0.1g isn't stable on your arch (it should be unless it's a weird one), unset USE=tls-heartbeat like Ralf said. But that's not your big problem. If you operate any