Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread wraeth
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:37:12PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/07/15 15:24, wraeth wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/07/15 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into

[gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

2015-07-09 Thread Walter Dnes
Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with the ebuild. It is important to update, because a zero-day exploit was discovered in the 400 gigabytes of data from the Hacking Team hack. And yes, it can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: smugI can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to Bash/smug Which one? And why is it superior to bash? Don't ask such questions ;-) This is in the same vein as the emacs vs vim argument. True, people persist

[gentoo-user] Recent change in ssh behavior caused by pam_ssh-2.1

2015-07-09 Thread walt
An upstream change in pam_ssh-2.1 requires you to add a new subdirectory: ~/.ssh/login_keys.d/ and in that directory you must create a symlink to ~/.ssh/id_rsa in order to be able to ssh in by using your ssh passphrase instead of your password. When you login (or ssh in) you will now see a prompt

Re: [gentoo-user] Recent change in ssh behavior caused by pam_ssh-2.1

2015-07-09 Thread Mick
On Thursday 09 Jul 2015 17:14:41 walt wrote: An upstream change in pam_ssh-2.1 requires you to add a new subdirectory: ~/.ssh/login_keys.d/ and in that directory you must create a symlink to ~/.ssh/id_rsa in order to be able to ssh in by using your ssh passphrase instead of your password.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:07:43 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: smugI can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to Bash/smug Which one? And why is it superior to bash? Don't ask such questions ;-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:45:09 +0300, Gevisz wrote: I say almost no old habits because I actually have one: I used to Ctrl-R to search through the command history in bash and so far I have not figured what will be its equivalent in zsh, Ctrl-R especially if to set its input mode to vim-like.

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Franz Fellner
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth would anyone release a program after 1990 that doesn't know the home/end keys?

[gentoo-user] KP_Decimal

2015-07-09 Thread Roger Cahn
Hi, Since a few days, when I type the point (.) on the numeric keypad, everytime, I obtain a window with: Impossible to launch the shortcut KP_Decimal. The execution of the son process . failed (permission not allowed) Can anybody give me a solution to have again the . on the numeric keypad ?

Re: [gentoo-user] KP_Decimal

2015-07-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:07:06 +0200, Roger Cahn wrote: Since a few days, when I type the point (.) on the numeric keypad, everytime, I obtain a window with: Impossible to launch the shortcut KP_Decimal. The execution of the son process . failed (permission not allowed) It sounds like a

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Stephan Müller
Am 06.07.2015 um 19:01 schrieb walt: My bash problem started a few weeks ago but I can't remember when. This problem is intermittent and hard to reproduce. I'm seeing it maybe less than ten times per day but often enough to be really annoying. This is the problem: occasionally bash gets

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while the original bash source maintains an own trimmed version of readline.. just a thought In that

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread walt
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while the original bash

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/07/15 15:01, Gevisz wrote: On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/07/15 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while the original bash source maintains an own trimmed version

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/07/15 15:01, Gevisz wrote: On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread wraeth
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/07/15 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while the original bash

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/07/15 15:24, wraeth wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/07/15 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I see gentoo's bash uses

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/07/15 19:07, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Don't ask such questions ;-) This is in the same vein as the emacs vs vim argument. True, people persist with Bash and vim, but in the latter case it appears to be because they actually like

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth would anyone release a program after 1990 that doesn't know the home/end keys? :-/ PS: The Del key doesn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread wraeth
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:36:50AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth would anyone release a program after 1990