Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:16:29 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote: > On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote: > >My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to > >compile systemd-226 today. > > Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is > almost 9

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote: > I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's > automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that You can switch it on or off, but it applies to the whole message. What I do if I want a

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Friday 11 September 2015 15:08:54 walt wrote: >My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to >compile systemd-226 today. Just out of curiosity: exactly how old? My dual-core amd64 system is almost 9 years old now, and systemd compiles in about 6 minutes: # genlop -t

Re: [gentoo-user] broken seamonkey :(

Mick writes: > On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 15:29:25 lee wrote: > [...] >> >> Is it possible to create a certificate that doesn't use either but a >> wildcard only? I don't understand why or how an fqdn/IP in a >> certificate could or should be relevant at all. > > It is

Re: [gentoo-user] broken seamonkey :(

Fernando Rodriguez writes: > On Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:29:25 PM lee wrote: > [...] >> >> When creating the certificate, I have used the fqdn the host does >> actually have and knows itself by (because I needed to fill in the >> fields, and it seemed most

Re: [gentoo-user] broken seamonkey :(

Mick writes: > On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 03:45:26 lee wrote: >> Mick writes: >> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote: > >> >> What's the solution for a server which can be reached by different fqdns >> >> and IPs? What if the fqdns and

[gentoo-user] SOLVED: broken seamonkey :(

lee writes: > Well, I've made a bug report about this: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202128 They suggested to try with seamonkey 2.35. I tried and found that 2.35 (and 2.38 beta) work fine. -- Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?

On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:57:04 Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Sunday 13 September 2015 13:16:29 Marc Joliet wrote: >> I couldn't get KMail -- which I am still getting used to -- to stop it's >> automatic line wrapping just for those lines, if it even supports that > >You can switch it on or off,

[gentoo-user] Gentoo net0 - auto resetting - very impressed

After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very impressive. Which configuration/program is responsible for it? Lately I've installed Fedora core on my old eeepc and I very impressed with the printer installation.

[gentoo-user] preserving zpool mountpoint on boot?

Greetings, If i export/import a zpool, the altroot property is not preserved so it always gets mounted at /. In /etc/init.d/zfs, the import line reads $ZPOOL import -c $ZPOOL_CACHE -aN 2>/dev/null || true so no -options there. I've also tried with zpool import -o altroot=/mnt -o

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo net0 - auto resetting - very impressed

On Sunday 13 Sep 2015 19:14:55 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto > configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very > impressive. > Which configuration/program is responsible for it? If you are running openrc, then I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo net0 - auto resetting - very impressed

On 09/13/2015 04:01 PM, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 13 Sep 2015 19:14:55 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> After recent upgrade, I've noticed the my network connection auto >> configure itself, depend which network I'm connected to. Very >> impressive. >> Which configuration/program is responsible for

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

wrote: > Dale wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following: > > > > > > The following installed packages are not in the database: > > > > sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev > > -- > > > > Equery gives me this:

[SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

waben...@gmail.com wrote: > wraeth wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote: >>> So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck >>> is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way

Re: [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 14/09/15 15:34, Dale wrote: > Well, I'd be chicken to have two packages dealing with /dev at the > same time, although portage says it is not a blocker. > > For future reference, I went and dug in this path: > > /var/db/pkg/sys-fs > > It

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote: > So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck > is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to > "find" it?? Can I remove it somehow?? I'm not certain, but I believe the

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

wraeth wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote: > > So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck > > is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to > > "find" it?? Can I remove

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

waben...@gmail.com wrote: > Dale wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following: >> >> >> The following installed packages are not in the database: >> >> sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev >> -- >> >> Equery gives me this: >> >> root@fireball

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

wraeth wrote: > On 14/09/15 13:46, Dale wrote: > > So, it's installed but I can't find it to remove it. What the heck > > is this about? Anyone else ever run into this? Is there a way to > > "find" it?? Can I remove it somehow?? > > I'm not certain, but I believe the -MERGING-* files are left

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

waben...@gmail.com wrote: > wrote: > >> Dale wrote: >> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following: >>> >>> >>> The following installed packages are not in the database: >>> >>> sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev >>> -- >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] preserving zpool mountpoint on boot?

Am 13.09.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Nuno Magalhães: > Greetings, > > If i export/import a zpool, the altroot property is not preserved so > it always gets mounted at /. > > In /etc/init.d/zfs, the import line reads > $ZPOOL import -c $ZPOOL_CACHE -aN 2>/dev/null || true > so no -options there. > > I've

[gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

Howdy, I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following: The following installed packages are not in the database: sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev -- Equery gives me this: root@fireball / # equery list *static-dev* * Searching for *static-dev* ... !!! No installed packages matching

Re: [gentoo-user] sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev installed but unable to find it

Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I ran eix-test-obsolete and in the output, I get the following: > > > The following installed packages are not in the database: > > sys-fs/-MERGING-static-dev > -- > > Equery gives me this: > > root@fireball / # equery list *static-dev* > *