[gentoo-user] Re: dev-lang/php-5.6

Am Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:00:40 -0700 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 02/27/2017 02:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 27/02/2017 22:14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? > > > > If you copy the ebuild into your local overlay,

Re: [gentoo-user] Cross-compiling for an unstable architecture.

> On 23 Feb 2017, at 22:21, R0b0t1 wrote: > > However it's gotten to the point where not even building on-device > works. I'm experiencing breakage in a lot of core packages that may or > may not be related to portage. What is the best way to ask for help? > The users on the

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/php-5.6

On 02/27/2017 02:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 27/02/2017 22:14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? > > If you copy the ebuild into your local overlay, then never > I'll do it just in case but eventually I'll be force to upgrade.

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk-2.14.2 cant find sqlite3 symbols

On 02/27/2017 03:44 PM, kelly hirai wrote: > corbin, > > i've finally discovered the problem with this. > > it turns out that there were a set of stale .so files in > /usr/iocal/bin/ installed in the year 2015. i discovered this by running: > > ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > Apologies for my not being able to reply sooner! > > On 170227-18:18+0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> > And via a new private big business, the Github. Giving over all users to >> > big Github brother. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/php-5.6

On 02/27/2017 03:14 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? > > php-7.0 is not working with my application (modification are too > intensive) besides I'm not a programmer. > The php-5.6 series will receive security updates until the end

Re: [gentoo-user] prevent 'openoffice-bin' rebuild

On 02/27/2017 06:06 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I have in: > /etc/revdep-rebuild/99revdep-rebuild > ... > SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/usr/lib64/openoffice" > [snip] The above should be: SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/usr/lib/openoffice" -- Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

Apologies for my not being able to reply sooner! On 170227-18:18+0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 12:00:50 +0100 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > But, when we talk crypto being broken, > > Git is not in the immediate threat due to SHA1 collision being > practical. See Linux blog

[gentoo-user] prevent 'openoffice-bin' rebuild

I have in: /etc/revdep-rebuild/99revdep-rebuild ... SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/usr/lib64/openoffice" But my openoffice-bin constantly rebuilds. Is there a way to prevent it besides switching to non bin ver.? !!! existing preserved libs: >>> package: dev-libs/libbsd-0.8.3 * - /usr/lib32/libbsd.so.0 *

Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk-2.14.2 cant find sqlite3 symbols

corbin, i've finally discovered the problem with this. it turns out that there were a set of stale .so files in /usr/iocal/bin/ installed in the year 2015. i discovered this by running: ebuild /usr/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk/webkit-gtk-2.14.5.ebuild configure the resulting ninja files

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/php-5.6

On 27/02/2017 22:14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? If you copy the ebuild into your local overlay, then never > > php-7.0 is not working with my application (modification are too > intensive) besides I'm not a programmer. > --

[gentoo-user] dev-lang/php-5.6

When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? php-7.0 is not working with my application (modification are too intensive) besides I'm not a programmer. -- Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

On 02/27/2017 01:45 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:54:32 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I just tried gscan2pdf. >> It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it >> must be an issue with Brother driver. > > Sounds like it. > >> In addition,

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I always though git's use of SHA hashes was to identify commits and > detect random bit flips, not to provide any measure of security. > As somebody said in Twitter recently (and Linus to some degree in his post),

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On 26/02/2017 22:32, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Miroslav Rovis > wrote: >> On 170225-21:34-0600, R0b0t1 wrote: >>> On Saturday, February 25, 2017, Miroslav Rovis >>> >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

On Monday 27 Feb 2017 10:09:34 Harry Putnam wrote: > I guess I'll try this once more... Its still a big log but I cleaned > up the escapes ... it is a fresh try at building > xf86-video-virtualbox-5.1.14 > > Still failing in the same way and still not seeing clues in the > log... probably my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

On Monday 27 Feb 2017 10:09:34 Harry Putnam wrote: > I guess I'll try this once more... Its still a big log but I cleaned > up the escapes ... it is a fresh try at building > xf86-video-virtualbox-5.1.14 > > Still failing in the same way and still not seeing clues in the > log... probably my

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 12:00:50 +0100 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > But, when we talk crypto being broken, Git is not in the immediate threat due to SHA1 collision being practical. See Linux blog about this: https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/7tp2gYWQugL Note that git devs are working on

[gentoo-user] Re: Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

Stroller writes: >> On 25 Feb 2017, at 14:19, Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> I've attached a hefty log of some 4000 lines and hope someone will be >> patient enough to try to identify what is causing the problem. > > I took a look at this, but

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > So danger of SHA1 collision is much closer than > 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 SHA1 computations or 1 110-GPU year. Indeed in every way it is closer than that than when Google started their project, and tomorrow it

[gentoo-user] Re: Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

Dale writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> Just so you know... I did try that. [--color n] The resulting log >> looked exactly the same. I posted that fact in an earlier request for >> help a week or so ago in which I remarked how using the no-color >> emerge option didn't

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:12:10 +0100 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html > > ( you know I hate the Schmoog, and didn't take their cookies, and so > they didn't show me their page in my Palemoon --working great here!, an > Angel of

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH rekeying straight after authentication

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:10:05 + Mick wrote: > I am trying to understand why an ssh server keeps dropping the connection > when > using openssh on Linux straight after a successful authentication, but it > works fine with Filezilla in MSWindows. [...] > I am guessing all this respawning

Re: [gentoo-user] Cross-compiling for an unstable architecture.

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:21:04 -0600 R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > So apparently I am single-handedly attempting to stabilize arm64 (at > least, it feels that way). Per the "Gentoo on Alternative > Architectures" subforum > (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewforum-f-32.html) two users have gotten > almost

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a dependency bug?

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:45:28 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote: > I installed weasyprint-0.29, but it won't run: > > $ weasyprint > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/weasyprint", line 6, in > from pkg_resources import load_entry_point >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

On 170226-09:42-0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Stroller writes: ... > > > Example at the beginning: [32;01m * > > Example from the end: * > > > > Output to the terminal these would show the text in different colours, > > but the output was redirected to a

Re: [gentoo-user] SHA-1 has just been broken

On 170226-14:32-0600, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Miroslav Rovis > wrote: > > On 170225-21:34-0600, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> On Saturday, February 25, 2017, Miroslav Rovis > >> > >> wrote: > >> > > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Need coaching with emerge failure logs (Understanting the problem)

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:31:22 +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 21:58:05 +0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > > On 170225-09:19-0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > > > > Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) > > > > host Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:54:32 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I just tried gscan2pdf. > It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it > must be an issue with Brother driver. Sounds like it. > In addition, I've noticed big difference is scan size of an image. >