On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> A week or two ago I was investigating some other weirdnesses and at one
> point I zeroed out the first partition: the unformatted one containing the
> UEFI data. It took longer than I expected, having only 2MB to fill.
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Marvin Gülker wrote:
> Am 02. September 2017 um 22:57 Uhr +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon
> :
>> OK, so disclaimer up front. I detest Ruby. I hate it with a passion.
>
> There is nothing one can do against that,
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote
>>> On 2017-08-31 08:47, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>>
1) To protect my gear against power surges/spikes/drops
2) To protect against
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote
>> On 2017-08-31 08:47, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>
>> > 1) To protect my gear against power surges/spikes/drops
>> > 2) To protect against the rare occurence when
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote
> On 2017-08-31 08:47, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > 1) To protect my gear against power surges/spikes/drops
> > 2) To protect against the rare occurence when power goes off for 1
> >or 2 seconds
>
> I do the same. Or at least I did
Am 02. September 2017 um 22:57 Uhr +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon
:
> OK, so disclaimer up front. I detest Ruby. I hate it with a passion.
There is nothing one can do against that, but...
> Each new minor version of ruby is a whole new language and the devs
> are OK with
On 2017-09-02 22:01, Mick wrote:
> ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
Ah, that's where the "via" comes from. I didn't realize when I wrote my
OP that iproute2 would be used by default, and not the old route program
from net-tools.
Thanks.
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> What is the exact syntax of the *_routes lines in the /etc/conf.d/net
> file, or where is it documented?
>
> The wiki gives a couple of examples, but they are all either just for
> dhcp (so no configurable routes) or
On 02/09/2017 15:33, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm in the process of doing a world update and due to a failed compile,
> I have cause to look up through the list of stuff to compile/update.
> Imagine my surprise when I saw there were three versions of Ruby wanting
> to update:
>
>
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 19:54:48 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the exact syntax of the *_routes lines in the /etc/conf.d/net
> file, or where is it documented?
>
> The wiki gives a couple of examples, but they are all either just for
> dhcp (so no configurable routes) or else they are
On 2017-09-02 21:05, Simon Thelen wrote:
> > Motivation: I want to add a route for a point-to-point interface.
> You probably only need to list the peer address on a single line and
> then that peer should become routable.
The problem was that _two_ routes were being added: the host-specific
On 2017-09-02 21:11, Branko Grubic wrote:
> > Motivation: I want to add a route for a point-to-point interface.
>
> Some examples you can find
> in /usr/share/doc/netifrc-0.5.1/net.example.bz2
That didn't really help much, sorry.
I figured out how to do it, but only by reading the shell code
On 17-09-02 at 11:54, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the exact syntax of the *_routes lines in the /etc/conf.d/net
> file, or where is it documented?
[..]
> "via" is not something I can use on the command line of the route
> command, at least according to its manpage. So it can't be just
>
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:54:48 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What is the exact syntax of the *_routes lines in the /etc/conf.d/net
> file, or where is it documented?
>
> The wiki gives a couple of examples, but they are all either just for
> dhcp (so no configurable routes)
What is the exact syntax of the *_routes lines in the /etc/conf.d/net
file, or where is it documented?
The wiki gives a couple of examples, but they are all either just for
dhcp (so no configurable routes) or else they are of the form
eth0_routes="default via eth0"
"via" is not something I can
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Grant wrote:
> My new laptop uses /dev/nvme0n1 instead of /dev/sda which conflicts
> with the script I use to manage about 12 similar laptops running
> Gentoo. Is there a udev method for renaming the disk that will work
> well with any USB
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 14:33:31 BST Andrew Lowe wrote:
> I'm in the process of doing a world update and due to a failed compile,
> I have cause to look up through the list of stuff to compile/update.
> Imagine my surprise when I saw there were three versions of Ruby wanting
> to update:
>
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 13:28:44 BST Jacques Montier wrote:
> I once encountered the problem with my Crucial SSD.
> I found a procedure to make the SSD detected which worked for me.
> http://forums.crucial.com/t5/Crucial-SSDs/Why-did-my-SSD-quot-disappear-qu
> ot-from-my-system/ta-p/65215
Hi all,
I'm in the process of doing a world update and due to a failed compile,
I have cause to look up through the list of stuff to compile/update.
Imagine my surprise when I saw there were three versions of Ruby wanting
to update:
[ebuild U ] dev-lang/ruby-2.4.1-r4 [2.4.1-r3]
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Grant wrote:
>
> My new laptop uses /dev/nvme0n1 instead of /dev/sda which conflicts
> with the script I use to manage about 12 similar laptops running
> Gentoo. Is there a udev method for renaming the disk that will work
> well with any USB
Hello,
I once encountered the problem with my Crucial SSD.
I found a procedure to make the SSD detected which worked for me.
http://forums.crucial.com/t5/Crucial-SSDs/Why-did-my-SSD-quot-disappear-quot-from-my-system/ta-p/65215
Hope this will help.
Cheers,
*--*
*Jacques*
2017-09-02 11:51
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 10:32:23 BST I wrote:
> ... Now smartmon appears to run ok - provided that I remove DEVICESCAN
> from /etc/smartd.conf and give it a specific device to monitor ...
Some months ago someone here mentioned a test suite for SSDs, but I can't
remember what it was called
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 02:24:57 BST Adam Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
> > For the last week or two my NVMe SSD isn't being detected on startup. I
> > get this error on manual invocation:
> >
> > # smartctl -a /dev/nvme0n1
On Friday, 1 September 2017 10:54:45 BST Arthur Țițeică wrote:
> În 1 septembrie 2017 12:46:39 EEST, Peter Humphrey
a scris:
> >Hello list,
> >
> >For the last week or two my NVMe SSD isn't being detected on startup. I
> >get
> >this error on manual invocation:
> >
> >#
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:10:13 -0700 Grant wrote:
> My new laptop uses /dev/nvme0n1 instead of /dev/sda which conflicts
> with the script I use to manage about 12 similar laptops running
> Gentoo. Is there a udev method for renaming the disk that will work
> well with any USB disks that happen to
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:38:42 -0400 Walter Dnes wrote:
> I'm running a Core2-duo desktop from 2008 with 3 gigs of ram. I want
> to run it into the ground, not throw it away while it's still
> functional. With Gentoo optimization, pluse using ICEWM, it's generally
> snappy. But there are a few
26 matches
Mail list logo