[gentoo-user] python build fail; undefined reference to pthread_* and sem_*

This is happening with both python 2.7.12 and 3.4.5 on a 32-bit x86 system. Build logs are attached, along with "emerge --info" output. I can't find anything relevant in bugzilla. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > What's called Management in ISO9000. > ISO9000 still lets you shoot yourself in the foot. You just wrote down that you were going to shoot yourself in the foot well in advance.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 11:46:22 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:20:53 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > > It turns out that over the past week or so, there have been several > > > > _different_ firefox ebuilds released. One of them was broken: > > Version 52.4.0 (Oct 3)

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner always wants to rebuild certain packages

On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 23:12:14 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > On 10/10/2017 11:30 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 04:01:29 CEST schrieb Daniel Frey: > >> I updated a machine today, it's fully up to date and depclean'ed. > >> > >> For some reason, perl-cleaner

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner always wants to rebuild certain packages

On 10/10/2017 11:30 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 04:01:29 CEST schrieb Daniel Frey: I updated a machine today, it's fully up to date and depclean'ed. For some reason, perl-cleaner consistantly wants to rebuild some packages: * Locating

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner always wants to rebuild certain packages

Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 04:01:29 CEST schrieb Daniel Frey: > I updated a machine today, it's fully up to date and depclean'ed. > > For some reason, perl-cleaner consistantly wants to rebuild some packages: > > > > * Locating packages for an update > * Locating

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 12:27:25 CEST schrieb Marc Joliet: > (Note that it does *not* search the description by default, and doesn't > claim to, either!) Ha, I tried to find a way to search only the description, but came up empty (you *can* search the description by searching through all

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:20:53 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > It turns out that over the past week or so, there have been several > _different_ firefox ebuilds released. One of them was broken: > > Version 52.4.0 (Oct 3) was OK. > > Version 52.4.0 (Oct 7) was broken. > > Version

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 02:57:21 CEST schrieb Grant Edwards: > On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote: > > On Monday, October 9, 2017, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> On 2017-10-09, allan gottlieb wrote: > >>> This is a know bug see

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 11:19:02 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey: > On Monday, 9 October 2017 20:20:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote: > > I don't really see how you can repeatedly release new versions of > > something without changing the version number, but maybe that's just me... > > No, it isn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Monday, 9 October 2017 20:20:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote: > I don't really see how you can repeatedly release new versions of > something without changing the version number, but maybe that's just me... No, it isn't just you. What you describe is a classic example of a developer trying to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Tab stepping order in Pale Moon

On Monday, 9 October 2017 17:41:34 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-10-09 10:31, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Recent discussion of Pale Moon has inspired me to try it (actually > > www- client/palemoon-bin). It seems fine, except for one annoying > > feature. I usually have several tabs open at a