On 2018-03-14 10:28, Pengcheng Xu wrote:
> Actually there’s a more memorable link that describes the matter
> concisely:
>
> https://amdflaws.com
Thanks for that, but there is nothing on that page I can actually read
without lowering my uBlock "shield". I'm going to check out LWN. In
any
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Philip Webb
> wrote:
>
>> 180313 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> > https://v.gd/PZkiuR
>> > Does anyone know more details?
>>
>> See LWN. It is being described as a scam
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 180313 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > https://v.gd/PZkiuR
> > Does anyone know more details?
>
> See LWN. It is being described as a scam by people shorting AMD stock.
Dan Guido / Trail of Bits was paid to review the
On 14/03/18 05:07, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
This guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_GitHub#Build_log
says:
"Due to the sheer amount of PRs that is coming our way on GitHub, and
the limited number of developers looking after them, we cannot
thoroughly test all PRs. Therefor, we
This guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_GitHub#Build_log
says:
"Due to the sheer amount of PRs that is coming our way on GitHub, and
the limited number of developers looking after them, we cannot
thoroughly test all PRs. Therefor, we kindly ask you to provide a link
to a build log
Actually there’s a more memorable link that describes the matter concisely:
https://amdflaws.com
Pengcheng Xu
i...@jsteward.moe
> H30/03/14 10:15、taii...@gmx.comのメール:
>
> Here is a non-shortened link.
>
Here is a non-shortened link.
https://it.slashdot.org/story/18/03/13/1558221/researchers-find-critical-vulnerabilities-in-amds-ryzen-and-epyc-processors-but-they-gave-the-chipmaker-only-24-hours-before-making-the-findings-public
All the more reason to avoid the ME/PSP garbage and instead buy the
On 03/13/2018 08:54 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
https://v.gd/PZkiuR
Does anyone know more details?
A shortened link? really? not clicking that.
On 03/13/2018 06:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:47:18 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> I did emerge manually sys-libs/zlib and ruby
>> but I'm still left with conflict.
>>
>> The portage-2.3.6 is no longer in tree, is it the reason I'm getting
>> this error?
>
>
180313 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> https://v.gd/PZkiuR
> Does anyone know more details?
See LWN. It is being described as a scam by people shorting AMD stock.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb
ELECTRIC /] [] [] []
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:47:18 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I did emerge manually sys-libs/zlib and ruby
> but I'm still left with conflict.
>
> The portage-2.3.6 is no longer in tree, is it the reason I'm getting
> this error?
No. Packages are removed from the tree all the time, it
https://v.gd/PZkiuR
Does anyone know more details?
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
On 03/13/2018 04:19 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:52:34 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> I spoke too soon. Now, when I try: emerge -u @system
>> I'm getting an error as well.
>>
>> emerge -ua @system
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:52:34 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I spoke too soon. Now, when I try: emerge -u @system
> I'm getting an error as well.
>
> emerge -ua @system
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> WARNING: One or
Thelma
On 03/13/2018 12:11 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> sys-apps/portage:0
>>
>> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>> pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument)
>>
>>
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:38:40 -0600
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
[…]
just a side note:
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.3.24-r1 [2.3.6] USE="(ipc) native-extensions xattr -build
-doc -epydoc -gentoo-dev% (-rsync-verify) (-selinux) (-linguas_ru%)"
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_5*
On 03/13/2018 12:11 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> sys-apps/portage:0
>>
>> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>> pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument)
>>
>>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> sys-apps/portage:0
>
> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument)
>
> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.6:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>
>
I'm upgrading an older system (maybe 4-months old). and getting an error
running
emerge --oneshot portage
emerge --oneshot portage
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild rR] app-arch/bzip2-1.0.6-r8 [1.0.6-r8]
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/automake-1.15.1-r2 [1.15-r2] USE="{-test%}"
Well, depends on your printer and exact driver you prefer to use.
I've just set up my HL-L5100DN as "Generic PostScript Printer Foomatic/
Postscript" and it works like a charm. Is it any reason for you to use
proprietary drivers?
В письме от понедельник, 12 марта 2018 г. 19:54:18 +07
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 9:20:36 PM CET the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 03/06/2018 03:11 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:40:08 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >> Is there a way to reinitialize USB ports without restarting the
> >> computer?
> >>
> >> Two of my USB 3
21 matches
Mail list logo