Re: [gentoo-user] Error with infinality font while emerging sane-backends

On 2018-03-28 04:34, Floyd Anderson wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:17:59 +0800 > Danny YUE wrote: >>Hi folks, >> >>I am trying to emerge xsane, which requires sane-backends. >>However, the sane-backends package fails forever with error message like >>below:

Re: [gentoo-user] Error with infinality font while emerging sane-backends

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:17:59 +0800 Danny YUE wrote: Hi folks, I am trying to emerge xsane, which requires sane-backends. However, the sane-backends package fails forever with error message like below: --- BEGIN --- Fontconfig error: Cannot load config file

[gentoo-user] Error with infinality font while emerging sane-backends

Hi folks, I am trying to emerge xsane, which requires sane-backends. However, the sane-backends package fails forever with error message like below: --- BEGIN --- Fontconfig error: Cannot load config file "infinality/conf.d" Error: /invalidfont in /findfont --- END --- I have only

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

Hello, On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >On 2018-03-27 22:00, David Haller wrote: > >> So, using your example, portage looks up the mirror for mirror://gnu >> by looking in /etc/portage/mirrors (if it exists) and >> /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartymirrors for a line with the word "gnu"

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

On 03/27/2018 02:50 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Example from app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r5 : > > SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/emacs/${P}.tar.xz > https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/emacs/${P}-patches-4.tar.xz; > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/635646

[gentoo-user] Re: What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

On 2018-03-27 22:00, David Haller wrote: > So, using your example, portage looks up the mirror for mirror://gnu > by looking in /etc/portage/mirrors (if it exists) and > /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartymirrors for a line with the word "gnu" > at the beginning, and then tries the mirrors specified

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

Hello, On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >Example from app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r5 : > >SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/emacs/${P}.tar.xz >https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/emacs/${P}-patches-4.tar.xz; It means take one of the list specified in /etc/portage/mirrors/ or

[gentoo-user] What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

Example from app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r5 : SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/emacs/${P}.tar.xz https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/emacs/${P}-patches-4.tar.xz; -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately

[gentoo-user] Re: The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

Have you looked at config.log in the work directory after the failed build? Those are very verbose, including the source code of tests run. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On 03/26/2018 07:19 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just > installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as > expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures: > both glibc and sandbox

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:19:07 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: […] It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the environment with this box's, but nothing stands out. […] Has

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just > installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as > expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/27/2018 03:19 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 03/26/2018 01:30:19 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I've switched one of my older box to desktop profile-17 updated gcc to >> 6.4.0-r1 and it compile just fine. >> But when I do  emerge -e @world >> recompile gcc-6.4.0-r1 get stuck on" >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 10:33:45 BST Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 01:24:09 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > >> I ran into this some time ago and one of the updates removed the /lib -> > >> /lib64

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 01:24:09 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > >> I ran into this some time ago and one of the updates removed the /lib -> >> /lib64 symlink. >> >> I simply ran `ln -s /lib64 /lib` and it was fine after

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)

On 03/26/2018 01:30:19 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I've switched one of my older box to desktop profile-17 updated gcc to 6.4.0-r1 and it compile just fine. But when I do emerge -e @world recompile gcc-6.4.0-r1 get stuck on" * One or more packages are either masked or have missing

Re: [gentoo-user] The return of the dreaded "Cannot run C compiled programs"

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 01:24:09 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > I ran into this some time ago and one of the updates removed the /lib -> > /lib64 symlink. > > I simply ran `ln -s /lib64 /lib` and it was fine after that. Nice idea, Dan, but that isn't it in this case: # /bin/ls -ld /lib lrwxrwxrwx