Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eno1 became back eth0

2019-11-14 Thread Mick
On Thursday, 14 November 2019 23:17:16 GMT Daniel Frey wrote: > I've also had interfaces randomly rename themselves (more than once.) > The second time it happened I forced the old behaviour and haven't had > any problems since... that was like six years ago now? (Or maybe more...) > > Dan +1,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eno1 became back eth0

2019-11-14 Thread Daniel Frey
On 2019-11-14 08:21, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2019-11-13, Alarig Le Lay wrote: PS: Old interface names were way more guessable than the new ones (eth0 used to work 99% of time). I really don’t understand why someone woke a morning a though “we should randomise this, it’s too much stable”.

Re: [gentoo-user] cannot compile sendmail in new gentoo installation

2019-11-14 Thread John Covici
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:47:53 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote: > > On 11/13/19 9:51 PM, John Covici wrote: > > Hi. I am trying to create a new installation as a chroot from > > my previous one since I don't have another box at hand and > > don't want to take this one down for several days to recompile

Re: [gentoo-user] cannot compile sendmail in new gentoo installation

2019-11-14 Thread Grant Taylor
On 11/13/19 9:51 PM, John Covici wrote: Hi. I am trying to create a new installation as a chroot from my previous one since I don't have another box at hand and don't want to take this one down for several days to recompile everything. Now I am stuck trying to emerge sendmail. I cannot

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eno1 became back eth0

2019-11-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:21 AM Grant Edwards wrote: > > The way it was explained to me was that the old way fell down in some > situations with multiple interfaces. Interfaces were named in the > order they were disovered by the kernel during startup. For some > sorts of NICs (e.g. PCI) the

[gentoo-user] Re: eno1 became back eth0

2019-11-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2019-11-13, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > PS: Old interface names were way more guessable than the new ones (eth0 > used to work 99% of time). I really don’t understand why someone woke a > morning a though “we should randomise this, it’s too much stable”. The way it was explained to me was that

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel headers

2019-11-14 Thread Anthony Delannoy
Thanks! That's what I was looking for :) Le November 13, 2019 4:42:54 PM UTC, Aidan Harris a écrit : >You could utilise package.provided to make portage assume the headers >are installed. e.g: > >/etc/portage/profile/package.provided/sys-kernel/linux-headers: > >sys-kernel/linux-headers-5.3 >